Helen Bergman Moure

Helen Bergman Moure

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 8.4

Licensed for 33 years

Litigation Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Litigation

2212 Queen Anne Avenue North, #293, Seattle, WA

About Helen

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Litigation 100%

Litigation and electronic discovery advice and consultation

34 years

100%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 60 minutes

Hourly Rates

$ 350-350 per hour


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 29 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1996

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Florida for 33 years

State: Florida

Acquired: 1992

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Lex Aperta pllc

2212 Queen Anne Avenue North, #293, Seattle, WA, 98109-2312

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Helen Bergman Moure's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Helen Bergman Moure's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Helen
Timothy B Mccormack headshot
Timothy Mccormack

Litigation lawyer | Oct 31

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Helen has a strong local and national reputation as a great lawyer and as an expert in electronic discovery!"

Daniel P. Harris headshot
Daniel Harris

Intellectual property lawyer | Feb 28

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer's work. Helen Moure is a true e-discovery whiz. She is highly respected and for very good reason."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  8.4 (Excellent)

Honors

2013

Faculty Member of the Month, Bryan University

2006

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

Work Experience

2010 - Present

Principal, Lex Aperta pllc

2007 - 2010

Partner, K&L Gates

1996 - 2006

Partner, Preston Gates & Ellis

1994 - 1996

Associate, Holland & Knight

1992 - 1994

judicial law clerk, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Associations

2011 - Present

Bryan University

Member, Advisory Board and Instructor

2010 - Present

Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists

Member, Advisory Board

2004 - Present

The Sedona Conference

Member, Working Group 1

1996 - Present

Washington State Bar Association

Member

1996 - Present

King County Bar Association

Member

1992 - Present

Florida State Bar

Member

2011 - 2015

The Northwest School Parent Association

co-chair and representative to board of trustees

2006 - 2009

Epiphany Parish, Madrona

Vestry Member

1995 - 1998

Denise Louie Education Center, board of trustees

Member

1994 - 2010

American Bar Association

Member

Education

1992

Boston University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1989

Bryn Mawr College

A.B.

Speaking Engagements

2015

WDTL Annual Torts CLE

E-Discovery Rules and Cases Update

2015

Today's General Counsel Institute - eDiscovery Meeting the Continuing Challenge of Litigation Holds and Preservation

2015

It's Electrifying! An Overview of Important Issues and Hot Topics in E-Discovery

Case Law Developments in E-Discovery

2015

ACEDS Annual conference

New Rules and Case Law Developments

2014

E-Discovery for the Corporate Market "The Exchange" in 2014

E-Discovery

2013

MAMAs lunchtime CLE program

E-Discovery & Ethics

2013

7th Annual Labor & Employment Law Conference

E-Discovery Boot Camp

2012

ACEDS Annual Conference Program

participant in multiple panel discussions

2012

6th Annual Labor & Employment Law Conference

E-Discovery Basics for Employment Cases

2011

E-Discovery: Federal Law, Washington Law, and Practical Considerations

Metadata and e-discovery

2010

Managing E-Discovery For All Types of Cases

e-discovery panel discussion

2009

What Every Practitioner Needs to Know About e-Discovery

E-Discovery

2009

ABA General Meeting

E-Discovery Around the World

2007

Public Records and Open Meetings

Electronic Discovery Issues and Public Records

2007

Meeting of the Law Review Committee

Electronic Discovery Best Practices

2007

Electronic Records Management and E-Discovery Forum

American E-Discovery Practice for Canadian Lawyers

2006

Practical Advice for Developing an Effective Dsicovery Response Plan

2006 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

2006

Patent Litigation Strategies Update

E-Discovery in Patent Litigation: New Rules, New Tools

2006

Modern Discovery CLE Program

Panel Chair, Just, Speedy and Inexpensive Determination of Cases

2006

Litigation & Document Retention Strategies Under the New Federal Rules

2006 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

2006

E-Discovery and the Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules - Panel Discusion

Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules

2006

Document Retention & E-Discovery

Ethical Issues Regarding Electronic Discovery Litigation

2006

Annual Conference on the Law of Lawyering

Metadata: Ethical Issues

2005

Legal and Strategic Guide to E-Discovery: Best Practices for Corporate Counsel

Employee Management: Training and Enforcement Strategies to Increase Compliance

2005

Electronic Evidence and Discovery

E-Evidence Discovery: why you need an electronic document retention policy

2005

CTC9

Panel Discussion: E-Discovery

2005

2nd National Advanced Forum on Document Retention & E-Discovery

Strategic Considerations for Document Storage and Retrieval

2004

Electronic Discovery Guidance for Corporate Counsel

Panel Discussion: Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules

2003

The Essentials of Document Collection, Production, and Discovery

Essentials of Document Collection, Production, and Discovery

2003

Electronic Discovery

E-Discovery Software and Techniques

Publications

1992

American Journal of Law and Medicine Case Comment: Moore v. Regents of the University of California

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution