Richard Philip Sax

Richard Philip Sax

3.7
Rating: 2.7

Licensed for 47 years

Divorce and separation Lawyer at Santa Rosa, CA
Practice Areas: Divorce & Separation, Personal Injury, Family ... +7 more

448 Sebastopol Ave, Santa Rosa, CA

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2024
See Details

About Richard

Biography

Practice Areas

10

Practice Areas

Family 15%

48 years

15%
Litigation 15%

48 years

15%
Real Estate 10%

48 years

10%
Business 9%

48 years

9%
Juvenile Law 3%

48 years

3%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 47 years

State: California

Acquired: 1978

Active

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2024

Location

Law Offices of Richard Philip Sax

448 Sebastopol Ave, Santa Rosa, CA, 95401

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Richard Philip Sax's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.7 /5.0

9 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews | Practice Area Knowledge

Posted by Scott | November 12, 2020 | Hired Attorney | Domestic Violence

Unskilled and Uncaring, Helped a Stalker Abuse a Disabled Man. Could Not Get Him Conversant in Case. Much Worse Off!

Richard may have been a good attorney once - I now think he doesn’t care about his clients. Everything here is my opinion, personal feelings or facts of the case. A person is using restraining orders to stalk me. Desperate to recover my life, I reluctantly sought a protective order. I told Richard... I only want to proceed if he was certain we’d win; he was pretty sure we could. After 2 years extreme PTSD, I gathered up last savings, paid his retainer. A huge step for me just to be in the courtroom with my abuser. We agreed to hiring a process server. His office called, insisted I find a friend to serve process or we’d miss filing date. High anxiety for me, never did get her served. I informed Richard, he said I’d wanted to be “near her.” First red flag for sure. Should have fired him then and there. He refused to become familiar with the prior case, could not convince him to be prepared. He not being conversant cost us dearly. In the courtroom, he was a complete greenhorn. My stalker took my claims and filed her own restraining order. Richard was unreachable - even his office doesn’t know how to reach him. When he finally responded, he said nothing new here - of course, it was my exact language! My stalker charged at me on the beach screaming and cussing. I couldn’t prove it, then lo, she brought in video which did. The video showed she lay in wait and images further contradicted her own Declaration. She lied 2x. Richard couldn’t win with that. My own witness described being harassed by my stalker 2x, followed out of the market by my ex with fists raised, spittle flying. She feared for her own safety and underwent six weeks of panic attacks. A County Supervisor’s wife, no less! Richard couldn’t win with that. My ex’s argument for running a stop sign to hit me was there were places I could have pulled over. I said I did pull over, her fool attorney just repeated himself. She did not deny the violent attack with a motor vehicle. Richard told me he’d won restraining orders just because someone gave someone the “bird”. I personally find it aggressive and yet my stalker proudly admitted it. Richard did not win. Richard presented his bill as if he’d won the case, a full 25% over his rate. The whole courtroom seem embarrassed as this doddering man was fully out of step with the proceedings. Ex and I were in the same restaurant together, no restraining orders issued. I never approached her, I never saw her. Oddly, my ex describes her own fixated behavior taking photos of me backwards over her shoulder, which photos contradict her own claims. Judge said ex gasped when she saw me, therefore deserves a 5 year restraining order against me, even though her testimony and declarations contradicted! I’m further entrapped by this person I only dated 1.5 years and want nothing more than to be left alone, worse off than before I’d met Richard. He failed to object, despite being asked, to the other attorney’s highly inflated fees, costing me an additional $5,000. I was suffering from PTSD so badly I couldn’t earn income. One word, object, would have done it. Richard’s invoice came in 3x over his quote, though no change in scope, venue, or the anticipated contention of opposing party, less work than promised, was unconversant. Entitled to copies of exhibits, Richard failed to request real-time, then refused to get them for me. Basic stuff. I feared I may have to move from my home. Richard quipped, “I think we did a pretty good job.” Really? She continues to stalk me. There’s nothing I can do, I’m disabled, terrorized, afraid to go out. COVID may have a single upside - I’ve been left alone more, and can finally get my head around what happened and write this review. It is my view that Richard Sax does not care about his clients, cases, profession. He struck me as lazy, uninformed, unresourceful, unskilled. He got me into far worse territory than I was. I highly recommend avoiding -

Posted by Melissa | April 23, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Foreclosure

Excellent!

After fighting foreclosure on my own for years by raising legal challenges it was time to turn it over to a professional. Knowing that most homeowners lose I needed the best attorney possible because I couldn't lose my home of thirty years. After much research on Google scholar it was narrowed down t...o three or four attorneys or law firms in Northern California based on repeated success for homeowners against the banks. One stood out not only for having a published opinion but also because I'd hired him years earlier to successfully represent me in a partnership dispute and that was Richard Sax. He has all the qualities that you want in an attorney. He's a sharp and experienced litigator who's driven to win and respected by the courts and the opposition. He's also honest and wants the best result for his clients. His communication skills are excellent, he listens and works with the client and always promptly responds to emails which I understand is kind of unusual. There aren't that many attorneys willing to go up against big business and the banks on the behalf of the little guy but this is something at which Sax excels. Foreclosure litigation is complex involving multiple areas of the law and he is experienced in them all. Making his representation even more effective his practice includes highly regarded real estate attorney, William Matz. His paralegals and staff are always cordial and helpful and this means a lot in something as nerve wracking as fighting a financial institution trying to take your home. His successful representation has prevented my home from being foreclosed on and I give him the highest possible recommendation.

Posted by Cynthia | October 03, 2017 | Hired Attorney | Limited Liability Company (LLC)

Convert Business To LLC

Richard Sax and his staff helped me change my business to a LLC. I attempted to do this myself but the process was too complicated, overwhelming, and time consuming to figure out. They made it easy and did everything so fast. I wish I would have contacted Richard earlier because the peace of mind I n...ow have for protecting personal assets is such a great feeling. Getting this done was a huge weight lifted for me and my family. If you need any kind of help with legal matters then you need to contact the Law Offices of Richard Sax. I can guarantee you will be glad you did!

See All Client Reviews

Richard Philip Sax's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Richard
Garrett Sutton headshot
Garrett Sutton

Litigation lawyer | Mar 11

Relationship: Worked for lawyer

"I worked with Richard when I practiced law in Santa Rosa. I found him to be very skilled as a litigator. I highly recommend him for civil litigation matters in Sonoma and Marin counties."

Michael S. Waddington headshot
Michael Waddington

Criminal defense lawyer | Jun 05

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Richard. He is a highly skilled attorney that is well respected in the legal community."

Robert Yigael Bell headshot
Robert Bell

Criminal defense lawyer | May 23

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Mr. Sax is a thorough and diligent advocate for his clients and works hard on his client's defense through court procedures and settlement negotiations"

Lamar Peckham headshot
Lamar Peckham

Personal injury lawyer | Mar 23

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer's work. Richard works hard for his clients to get maximum recovery for their injuries."

View All Endorsements
Garrett Sutton headshot
Garrett Sutton

Business lawyer

Experience

Rating:  2.7 (Strong Caution)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2024.

Discipline with Actual Suspension issued in CA, 2024

updated on 09/27/2024

This sanction means the attorney lost his or her license to practice law for a period of time. The attorney typically returns to practicing law when the suspension expires.

Work Experience

2002 - Present

Settlement Panel, Sonoma County Superior Courts

1978 - Present

Attorney, Law Office of Richard Sax

Associations

Sonoma County Bar Association

Better Business Bureau

Parker Stanbury

Business Network International

1997 - 2001

San Pablo Pacific, Inc.

Officer, Director & General Counsel

1996 - 2001

Pacific Musical Society

Officer & Director

1985 - 1995

Hogue Equipment Company

General Counsel

Sample of Legal Cases

Motor Vehicle Accident

Settlement

Personal Injury / Contract

Settlement

Personal Injury

Settlement

Personal Injury

Settlement

See More Legal Cases

Education

1977

Seattle University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1975

Gonzaga University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

N/A

Legal Writing Seminars

Speaker / Sonoma County Law Library

Publications

2014

227 Cal.App.4th 299 (foreclosure defense) James Rufini v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

2013

221 Cal.App.4th 242 (guardianship with ICWA issues) Guardianship of D.W

1984

159 Cal. App. 3d 586 (conspiracy) Manor Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2024
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution