Newport Beach, CA
Wrongful termination Lawyer at Newport Beach, CA
Practice Areas: Wrongful Termination, Employment & Labor
OUTCOME: Employer's motion to vacate and request reopen denied. Claimant eligible for benefits.
The issues were whether the employers application to vacate should be granted; whether the case should be reopened; and whether the claimant should be denied benefits under section 1256.
OUTCOME: Notice of overpayment is modified. Claimant is not liable for a penalty under code section 1375.1
The claimant appealed from a notice of over payment that held the claimant was liable for the repayment of benefits under under Unemployment Insurance Code section 1375 and a penalty assessment under s ... ection 1375.1.
OUTCOME: Reversed.
The claimant appealed from a determination disqualifying the claimant for unemployment benefits under unemployment insurance code section 1256. The issue was whether the claimant was discharged for mi ... sconduct connected with the most recent work.
OUTCOME: Affirmed.
The issue was whether the claimant was discharged for misconduct connected with her most recent work.
OUTCOME: Reversed.
The claimant appealed from a determination disqualifying the claimant for unemployment benefits under Unemployment Insurance Code section 1256. The issue was whether the claimant was terminated for mi ... sconduct connected with his most recent work.
OUTCOME: Reversed.
The claimant appealed from a notice of overpayment that held the claimant liable for the repayment of benefits under Unemployment Insurance Code section 1375.
OUTCOME: Reversed.
The claimant appealed from a determination disqualifying the claimant for unemployment benefits under Code section 1256. The issue was whether the claimant was terminated for misconduct connected with ... the work.
OUTCOME: Affirmed.
The employer board appealed the decision from the Administrative Law Judge will found that the claimant was eligible for benefits under code section 1256.
OUTCOME: Reversed.
The claimant appealed from a Notice of Determination disqualifying him from unemployment insurance eligibility under code section 1256. The primary issue was whether the claimant voluntarily resigned ... from his most recent work.
OUTCOME: Dismissed for employer nonappearance.
The claimant was approved for benefits by the EDD. The employer then requested a hearing to contest the claimant's award, but the employer failed to appear at the hearing.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
