Newport Beach, CA
Wrongful termination Lawyer at Newport Beach, CA
Practice Areas: Wrongful Termination, Employment & Labor
OUTCOME: The Notice of Overpayment was modified. The claimant was not liable for a penalty under 1375.1.
The claimant appealed a Notice of Overpayment that held that the claimant was laible for repayment of benefits and a 30 percent monetary penalty under Unemployment Insurance Code section 1375.1.
OUTCOME: Notice of Overpayment Reversed and canceled.
The claimant appealed a Notice of Overpayment from the EDD which held that the claimant was liable for repayment of benefits under Unemployment Insurance Code section 1375.
OUTCOME: Notice of overpayment is modified. Claimant is not liable for a penalty under code section 1375.1
The claimant appealed from a notice of overpayment that held the claimant was liable for the repayment of benefits under Unemployment Insurance Code section 1375 and liable for a 30 percent monetary pe ... nalty assessment under Unemployment Insurance Code section 1375.1.
OUTCOME: Notice of Determination and ruling was Reversed.
The claimant appealed from a determination disqualifying the claimant for Unemployment Benefits under Unemployment Insurance Code section 1256. The issue was whether the claimant was discharged for mi ... sconduct connected with the most recent work.
OUTCOME: The determination was affirmed and the claimant was not disqualified under section 1256.
The employer appealed from a determination that held the claimant was not disqualified for benefits under Unemployment Insurance Code section 1256. The issues were: (1) whether the claimant was discha ... rged for misconduct connected with the most recent work; and (2) whether the employer's reserve account is subject to charges.
OUTCOME: Reversed.
The claimant appealed a determination which held the claimant disqualified for benefits under code section 1257(a).
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
