Clinton R. Brimhall has been an associate attorney at the firm of Christensen Law since March 2015. He has handled various legal matters related to divorce, child custody, child support, domestic violence, personal injury, contracts, property, and debt collection. Mr. Brimhall also has worked on appeals in both the civil and criminal arenas. Appellate briefs he has written have been submitted to the Utah Supreme Court, the Utah Court of Appeals, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The appeals Mr. Brimhall has handled include cases Christensen Law took to trial and cases that other firms originally took to trial before the client hired Christensen Law to appeal the trial court decision.
Mr. Brimhall enjoys interacting with his clients and continuously strives to respond promptly to their telephone calls or emails. When clients are considering potential courses of action, Mr. Brimhall is prepared to provide advice about both the legalities and practicalities of various options. Mr. Brimhall is capable of both helping clients take their causes to court and helping clients reach a settlement outside of court.
Mr. Brimhall has been a member of the Utah State Bar since October 2014 and is a member of the bar’s Family Law and Appellate Practice sections. In April 2014, Mr. Brimhall earned his J.D., magna cum laude, from the BYU Law School, in Provo, Utah, where he served as an executive editor on the BYU Law Review and was a member and local officer of Phi Delta Phi—Sutherland Inn. Prior to law school, Mr. Brimhall majored in English language, minored in editing, and in 2011, graduated from BYU with a B.A. and University Honors.
Mr. Brimhall is admitted to practice in all Utah state courts. This includes the Utah Supreme Court, the Utah Court of Appeals, state district courts, juvenile courts, small claims courts, and justice courts. Mr. Brimhall is also admitted to practice in the United States District Court for the District of Utah and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
|Award name||Grantor||Date granted|
|C.D. Taylor Historical Research Award, 3rd Place Winner||BYU Charles Redd Center||2015|
|JD Magna Cum Laude||Brigham Young University||2014|
|BA w/ University Honors||Brigham Young University||2011|
|Academic Scholarship||BYU Law School||2011|
|Associate Attorney||Christensen Law||2015 - Present|
|Volunteer Attorney||Family Justice Center||2014 - 2014|
|Public Service Fellow/Pro Bono Attorney||Utah Legal Services||2014 - 2015|
|Law Clerk||Hansen Wright Eddy & Haws, P.C.||2013 - 2014|
|Law Clerk||BYU General Counsel||2013 - 2013|
|Summer Extern||McKay, Burton & Thurman||2012 - 2012|
|Summer Extern||Utah Supreme Court||2012 - 2012|
|Association name||Position name||Duration|
|Utah State Bar, Appellate Practice Section||Member||2016 - Present|
|J. Reuben Clark Law Society||Member||2014 - Present|
|Utah State Bar, Family Law Section||Member||2014 - Present|
|Utah State Bar||Member||2014 - Present|
|Phi Delta Phi||Member||2011 - Present|
|BYU Law Review||Executive Editor & Associate Editor||2012 - 2014|
|BYU Honors Thesis||"Even" as an Appositive Marker in Oratory of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints||2011|
|Utah Historical Quarterly||The Goshen and Mona Water Dispute, 1873-1881: A Case Study of the Struggle Between Ecclesiastical and Secular Authority in Utah||2010|
|Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School||JD||2014|
|Brigham Young University||BA||2011|
|BYU Law Class Paper Presentation--Cyberlaw||Privacy and Anonymity Concerns Stemming from WHOIS||2013|
|Rehn v. Christensen et al.||Affirmed in favor of client appellee and against client cross-appellant|
|S. v. S||All issues settled at mediation|
|S. v. S.||Protective order granted for client|
Posted by Stephanie
Sat Dec 10 2016
Posted by anonymous
Mon Sep 26 2016
Cash, Check, Credit Card
Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.
Years licensed, work experience, education
Peer endorsements, associations, awards
Publications, speaking engagements