Eric L. Pines

PRO

Eric L. Pines

4.8
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 30 years

Employment and labor Lawyer at Houston, TX
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Social Security

10101 Fondren Road, Suite 575, Houston, TX

Virtual Consultation Available

Free Consultation

About Eric

Biography

An experienced and results-oriented Federal Employee and Social Security Disability Attorney. Call today for a consultation!

Over 20 years of Federal Employee Representation.

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Employment and Labor 75%

With 30 years of experience, I have dedicated my career to representing federal employees in employment and labor law matters. My practice focuses on protecting the rights of federal workers and unions, emphasizing disabled employees.

32 years | 1,000 cases

75%
Social Security & Disability 25%

With 30 years of experience, I guide clients through the Social Security Disability process, from applications to appeals, ensuring effective advocacy every step of the way.

25%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 10 minutes

Retainer

Sometimes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Awards

Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2021 2020 2016
...
+ 2
AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating
Super Lawyer

Licenses

Licensed in Texas for 15 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 2010

Eligible to Practice in Texas

No misconduct found

Licensed in Maryland for 20 years

State: Maryland

Acquired: 2005

Inactive - Retired

No misconduct found

Licensed in California for 30 years

State: California

Acquired: 1996

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Pines Federal Employment Attorneys

10101 Fondren Road, Suite 575, Houston, TX, 77096

pinesfederal.lawbrokr.com/lp/avvo

Pines Federal Employment Attorneys

1212 Reisterstown Road, Suite 201, Pikesville, MD, 21208

pinesfederal.lawbrokr.com/lp/avvo

Pines Federal Employment Attorneys

3190 NE Expressway, Suite 410-F, Atlanta, GA, 30341

pinesfederal.lawbrokr.com/lp/avvo

Online Presence

Other places you can find Eric online.

Eric L. Pines's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.8 /5.0

54 Client Reviews


Client Insights

Avvo uses AI to summarize reviews left for lawyers, providing a helpful overview of overall sentiment. Each summary is based on up to 500 of the most recent reviews and is refreshed upon submission of each new review. The number of reviews used may be displayed.

AI-summarized from Avvo client reviews

Many reviews praise the lawyer and their team for their expertise in federal employment law, professionalism, and empathetic client approach. Reviewers frequently highlight successful outcomes, including favorable settlements and job retention, attributing these to the lawyer's knowledge, responsiveness, and dedication.

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews | 1 star

Posted by Mark English | June 05, 2026 | Hired Attorney

Avoid

Paid Intake Consultation: On March 8, 2024, I paid a $500 fee for an intake consultation. I attempted to explain my history but was cut off repeatedly with unproductive comments. Despite paying for a full hour, counsel appeared eager to rush off the phone from the very first minute, and the session w...as abruptly cut short at 48 min. Disregard of Explicit Instructions: On March 28, 2024, I provided over 1 GB of sensitive documentation, explicitly instructing the assigned attorney, Amanda Moreno, that specific materials were strictly for "attorney eyes only" to build case strategy. Disregarding my clear instructions, she disclosed these documents to the opposing federal agency during discovery, severely compromising my legal position. Substandard Legal Work: Legal document submissions from Pines were sloppy, riddled with basic misspellings, and contained egregious factual and gender errors (falsely identifying me as female when I am male). The firm routinely promised to share documents in advance for my feedback, failed to do so, and completely missed critical evidence throughout the process. Court-Ordered Sanction: Due to the firm missing critical deadlines, the Administrative Judge issued an official legal sanction against my case on January 16, 2025. Unbelievably, the firm then billed me for the hours they spent drafting responses to defend their own administrative errors. Furthermore, they promised to address missing discovery items from the agency but failed to pursue them. Instead, they wrote a defensive letter to the judge excusing their behavior, and never sought out discovery items that were not supplied by the agency. Pervasive Unprofessionalism: Over the course of the representation, the firm established a persistent pattern of completely ghosting pre-scheduled, critical legal discussions. I was stood up with zero notice or via last-minute excuses on at least nine distinct times: April 11, April 15, April 21, and November 9 of 2024; and January 25, January 26, February 14, February 24, and February 28 of 2025. Each time, I took off work and rearranged major family obligations. I was given every excuse imaginable: localized technical issues, weather events, and multiple personal illnesses. On one occasion, I caught the attorney in a contradiction when she claimed she was sick, only for a paralegal to inadvertently admit she was away attending a wedding. Gaps in Knowledge & High Turnover: Even months into the case, the assigned attorney routinely didn’t read or forgot core facts. I was forced to explain critical elements multiple times, yet they still failed to find their way into the legal materials. Furthermore, there is an unusually high internal turnover rate; my file was passed between two separate attorneys and two separate paralegals who left the firm, destroying all case continuity and forcing me to repeatedly get new staff up to speed. Misrepresentation to the Court: We spent exactly 63 minutes on a single phone log-verified call reviewing discovery, yet the attorney formally represented to the federal judge that we had spent three hours actively coordinating and preparing the file. Hostile Client Management: If you express legitimate disappointment regarding these failures to managing partner Eric Pines, you are immediately redirected to Operations Manager Steven Tu, who acts as an aggressive, dismissive, and entirely apathetic barrier to accountability. Bad Faith Retention & Resolution: When I initially attempted to sever ties due to their severe lack of care, the firm held an emergency conference, begged me to stay on the merits of my case, and promised to assign additional legal resources. I agreed, yet the pattern of negligence continued until my case was ultimately dismissed without a hearing. When I formally requested a refund of my fees (exceeding $10,000) on May 15, 2026, the firm initially offered a 50% refund. When I requested to be made completely whole, they retaliated by completely resc

Posted by anonymous | June 04, 2026 | Hired Attorney

Avoid

Avoid * Paid Intake Consultation: On March 8, 2024, I paid a $500 fee for an intake consultation. I attempted to explain my history but was cut off repeatedly with unproductive comments. Despite paying for a full hour, counsel appeared eager to rush off the phone from the very first minute, and the ...session was abruptly cut short at 48 minutes. * Breach of Confidentiality: On March 28, 2024, I provided over 1 GB of sensitive documentation, explicitly instructing the assigned attorney, Amanda Moreno, that specific materials were strictly for "attorney eyes only" to build case strategy. In direct violation of my instructions, she disclosed these documents to the opposing federal agency during discovery, severely compromising my legal position. * Substandard Legal Work: Legal document submissions from Pines were sloppy, riddled with basic misspellings, and contained egregious factual and gender errors (falsely identifying me as female when I am male). The firm routinely promised to share documents in advance for my feedback, failed to do so, and completely missed critical evidence throughout the process. * Court-Ordered Sanction: Due to the firm missing critical deadlines, the Administrative Judge issued an official legal sanction against my case on January 16, 2025. Unbelievably, the firm then billed me for the hours they spent drafting responses to defend their own administrative errors. Furthermore, they promised to address missing discovery items from the agency but failed to pursue them. Instead, they wrote a defensive letter to the judge excusing their behavior, and never sought out discovery items that were not supplied by the agency. * Pervasive Unprofessionalism: Over the course of the representation, the firm established a persistent pattern of completely ghosting pre-scheduled, critical legal discussions. I was stood up with zero notice or via last-minute excuses on at least nine distinct times: April 11, April 15, April 21, and November 9 of 2024; and January 25, January 26, February 14, February 24, and February 28 of 2025. Each time, I took off work and rearranged major family obligations. I was given every excuse imaginable: localized technical issues, rolling weather events, and multiple personal and colleague illnesses. On one occasion, I caught the attorney in a blatant lie when she claimed she was sick, only for a paralegal to inadvertently admit she was away attending a wedding. * Gaps in Knowledge: Even months into the case, the assigned attorney routinely didn't read or forgot core facts. I was forced to explain critical elements multiple times, yet they still failed to find their way into the legal materials. * Unconventionally High Turnover: At Pines, there is an unusually high internal turnover rate; my file was passed between two separate attorneys and two separate paralegals who left the firm, destroying all case continuity. I felt compelled, and was responsible for getting all of these new folks up to speed on the case. * Misrepresentation to the Court: We spent exactly 63 minutes on a single phone log-verified call reviewing discovery, yet the attorney formally represented to the federal judge that we had spent three hours actively coordinating and preparing the file. * Hostile Client Management: If you express legitimate disappointment regarding these failures to managing partner Eric Pines, you are immediately redirected to Operations Manager Steven Tu, who acts as an aggressive, dismissive, and entirely apathetic barrier to accountability. * Bad Faith Retention & Resolution: When I initially attempted to sever ties due to their severe lack of care, the firm held an emergency conference, begged me to stay on the merits of my case, and promised to assign additional legal resources to secure my hearing. I agreed, yet the pattern of negligence continued until my case was ultimately dismissed without a hearing. When I form

Posted by Z. Mohammed | April 28, 2021 | Hired Attorney

Avoid my Mistake

I hired Mr. Eric Pines for the period Nov 2017-mid August 2018. when Eric took my case, he told me that he has experience and knows what to do. His law firm is a " Federal Employment ", however throughout my experience with him, he has no idea at all about Federal Law. The firm seemed professional, h...ad a flashy website boasting years of experience. He filed initial filing with MSPB and charged me 10.000 just for filling a single filling, then he dropped my case and assigned a lawyer under training in his law firm (e.g., Joshua Kahn), who joined the www.pinesfederal.com just 6 months before my case was assigned to him, with no experience in MSPB cases or/ and hearing. Nine months into my MSPB appeal, his firm had charged me three times the normal attorney fees for such a case. (which I found out after one of my friend hired an intensive experienced Federal lawyer in CA with over 30 years of real experience in MSPB and EEO, my friend won his case with MSPB easily with paying 10.000 in total cost). It is fact that a good attorney who care about his client would not leave his client case in the hand of new lawyer who just graduated 3 years and joined the law firm 6 month only without previous hearing experience. Eric Pines didn't commit to the signed agreement with me, including my rights to get the best service, and high quality representation. Now, Eric Pines caused excessive damage to my case. Let alone the fact that I need to hire another attorney to fix Eric's mess, and start everything from again and pay for the same what he was supposed to do. I am advice everyone need lawyer or federal lawyer to look somewhere else, and avoid my mistake. I highly NOT recommend Eric Pins and his law firm for any has a federal case.

Eric Pines

Replied last November 09, 2023

I disagree with virtually all of the statements made in this review, however, Bar Ethical rules do not allow me to argue the specifics of her false statements. That being said I continue the wish the best for her and her future and pray for her. As an aside I would like to note that the attorney she references as being under training and not knowledgeable about the MSPB has moved on from our firm when the MSPB hired him as a Judge (the court that she said he had no experience in). It appears that the Chief Judge at the MSPB disagrees with this client as far as the attorneys/Judge's competence and knowledge of MSPB law.

See All Client Reviews

Eric L. Pines's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Eric
Timothy John Corrigan headshot
Timothy Corrigan

Employment and labor lawyer | Jul 28

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"Mr. Eric Pines has my strongest possible endorsement. In a Federal labor matter, he and I were opposing counsel. I found him to be a challenging adversary, but more importantly, he is one of the most ethical attorneys I know. Honest and forthright, Mr. Pines upholds the highest standards of our profession. I now proudly call him a friend."

Gary P. Katz headshot
Gary Katz

Employment and labor lawyer | Feb 11

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Darrin Wayne Gibbons headshot
Darrin Gibbons

Employment and labor lawyer | Oct 12

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I met Eric as opposing counsel on a matter involving a federal employment law dispute. He represented his client well, and I was impressed by his knowledge, preparation and attention to detail."

Shervin Isaac Gabayan headshot
Shervin Gabayan

Employment and labor lawyer | Mar 19

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Eric Pines is an extremely knowledgeable professional on federal employment law matters that has been able to provide valued assistance to my clients on these issues. He is a pleasure to work with."

Stephen William Goldenzweig headshot
Stephen Goldenzweig

Employment and labor lawyer | Dec 12

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Eric is a bright, energetic, and gifted attorney. He is a creative problem-solver with a broad range of skills and a cheerful and professional disposition. He is extremely dependable and cares deeply about his friends, his colleagues, and, most importantly, his clients. Eric's take-charge personality coupled with his diligence, maturity, intelligence, and ingenuity make him an asset to the legal profession."

Judd Garrett Millman headshot
Judd Millman

Employment and labor lawyer | Nov 21

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Eric is highly respected in his specialized areas of law, recognized in the legal community, and a "go to" attorney for all issues dealing with employment law. A hard-driving, motivated attorney who is known throughout Texas, Maryland and beyond for achieving maximum results for his clients."

Bruce Mark Luchansky headshot
Bruce Luchansky

Employment and labor lawyer | Nov 15

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Eric Pines is an exceptional employment law attorney. Eric and I have teamed up to work together on a number of different matters, including claims such as disability discrimination and violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. At all times, I have found Eric to be diligent, cooperative, thorough, and effective. He has a client-oriented approach to his practice that is wonderful. I highly endorse my colleague as a top-notch employment law practitioner. Bruce M. Luchansky, Esq. Luchansky Law 606 Bosley Avenue, Suite 3B Towson, MD 21204 410.522.1020 www.luchanskylaw.com Maryland Workplace Law"

Christopher Francis Attig headshot
Christopher Attig

Employment and labor lawyer | Jan 06

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I am familiar with Eric's work, and his representation of Federal Employees and U.S. Veterans in variety of claims against the government. I recommend Eric without reservation."

Morris E Fischer headshot
Morris Fischer

Administrative law lawyer | Dec 20

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Eric Pines is very honest, hard working and dedicated to his clients. He has never been someone practicing law for the money. He really cares about his clients and obtaining excellent results. He also has strong command of Administrative law involving federal employees."

James Wilson Richard II headshot
James Richard

Employment and labor lawyer | Dec 08

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer."

Elliott M. Cin headshot
Elliott Cin

Personal injury lawyer | Dec 02

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer."

Richard Klein headshot
Richard Klein

Employment and labor lawyer | Jul 21

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I am attorney who works in the same field as Mr. Pines. I have worked with him on cases and find his work to be top caliber. He has a very broad knowledge of Federal Sector and EEO law. He has unique talents with negotiation and the ability to reach a settlement that can often be a win-win for both sides. He has a very nice rapport with his clients and is well likes and respected by them. I have been at hearings with him and I find his litigation skills to be top notch. I wholeheartedly recommend him with no reservations to potential clients."

Lawrence J. Sherman headshot
Lawrence Sherman

Employment and labor lawyer | Jul 14

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Eric is a highly competent and dedicated lawyer. He is highly skilled as a researcher and legal writer and is a skilled advocate. Eric is highly ethical and reliable. I not only endorse this lawyer, but also work with Eric as well as refer work to him regularly"

View All Endorsements
Harvey Bradford Harris headshot
Harvey Harris

Employment and labor lawyer

Gary P. Katz headshot
Gary Katz

Intellectual property lawyer

Gavriel E. Toso headshot
Gavriel Toso

Workers compensation lawyer

Aaron David Wersing headshot
Aaron Wersing

Discrimination lawyer

Darrin Wayne Gibbons headshot
Darrin Gibbons

Employment and labor lawyer

Stephen William Goldenzweig headshot
Stephen Goldenzweig

Litigation lawyer

Judd Garrett Millman headshot
Judd Millman

Employment and labor lawyer

Bruce Mark Luchansky headshot
Bruce Luchansky

Employment and labor lawyer

Christopher Francis Attig headshot
Christopher Attig

Employment and labor lawyer

Morris E Fischer headshot
Morris Fischer

Employment and labor lawyer

James Wilson Richard II headshot
James Richard

Employment and labor lawyer

Elliott M. Cin headshot
Elliott Cin

Social Security & Disability lawyer

David A. Shulman headshot
David Shulman

Wills and living wills lawyer

Timothy John Corrigan headshot
Timothy Corrigan

Employment and labor lawyer

Ben David Manevitz headshot
Ben Manevitz

Intellectual property lawyer

Richard Klein headshot
Richard Klein

Employment and labor lawyer

Cari Michele Pines headshot
Cari Pines

Family lawyer

Lawrence J. Sherman headshot
Lawrence Sherman

Employment and labor lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2026

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2024

Texas Super Lawyer, Texas Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2021

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2018

Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2017

Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2016

Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2015

Top Lawyers, Houstonia Magazine

Work Experience

2002 - Present

Principal, Law Office of Eric L. Pines, PLLC

2001 - 2010

Associate General Counsel, AFGE Local 1923

1996 - 1997

Attorney, United States District Court, Central District Of California

Associations

2011 - Present

National Employment Law Institute

Member

2010 - Present

State Bar of Texas, Labor and Employment Law Section

Member

2005 - Present

Maryland State Bar Association

Member

2005 - Present

United States District Court for the District ofMaryland

Member

1996 - Present

State Bar of California

Member

1996 - Present

United States District Court for the Central District of California

1995 - Present

American Bar Association

Member

2003 - 2010

Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

AFGE 4060 vs. FEMA

Settlement Recovered 16 million dollars for FEMA Employees.

AFGE 1633 vs. V.A.

Win

Phuoung vs. V.A. (Houston)

Win -- 10,000 Back Pay -- Full Attorneys Fees

AFGE 1923 (Indian Head) vs. Dept of Navy

Settled for $520,000 with Attorney Fees

See More Legal Cases

Education

1995

Loyola Law School, Loyola Marymount University

J.D.

1992

University of California, Los Angeles

B.A.

N/A

University of California - Santa Barbara

Speaking Engagements

2024

Disability Inclusion and Accommodation in the Workplace Disability Inclusion and Accommodation in the Workplace - Host

2018

Litigation Training

Equal Employment Opportunity and Marriage Systems Protection Board

2017

Final rule requires affirmative action for disabilities in federal workforce Final rule requires affirmative action for disabilities in federal workforce

2016

AFGE Veterans Affairs Training 2016

Federal Labor Arbitration Boot Camp

2013

2012

Federal EEO Training

Retaliation and Harassment in the Federal System

2010

Federal Retirement Seminar

Estate Planning for Federal Employees

2010

AFGE Federal EEO Training

Disability Discrimination in the Federal Government

2008

AFGE Steward Training

EEO Disability Discrimination Training

Publications

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution