Free Consultation
$0 first 20 minutes
I graduated from the University of Houston Law Center in 1989, receiving a good share of those college credits from participation in legal aid clinics. I felt, and still do, that it would provide good training for a solo practice. Going solo might not have been the best financial decision I ever made, but it has turned out to be a fulfilling one. By focusing my practice on criminal and family law, I believe helping people with the most personal and important of all legal matters is the best use of my education
3
Practice Areas
Free Consultation
$0 first 20 minutes
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Texas
Acquired: 1989
No misconduct found
2100 West Loop S Ste 900, Houston, TX, 77027-3522
Showing 1 - 5 of 6 client reviews from Avvo
Posted by Christina | October 11, 2018 | Hired Attorney
Roark is a fabulous lawyer!! He works quick to get things done, works hard on your case, he has always called me back in a timely manner, he has always answered my questions.. Roark has been my lawyer for 14+ years.. He always made me feel confident about my case from day one.. When I 1st talked to h...
Posted by anonymous | November 13, 2014
This attorney is a slow-witted litigant that refuses to acknowledge current case law. He will do absolutely nothing to improve your disposition once he is retained, and you can have the same result if you remain Pro Se. He contends that there are no limits to the power exercised by family court...
I certainly disagree with this former client’s rendition of the matter, even aside from the rude remarks. I was never retained to draft a motion for enforcement. The client prepared her own motion, filed it (pro se), then brought it to me telling me it had been served on the opposing party and a court date was set. I was retained to appear on that date and argue *her* motion. So when I appeared, I learned that the motion she gave me was one that she filed AFTER the one she had served on the other party. As a result, the court did not hear it. Another complication in that case was that the court had ruled on a modification action 4 or 5 months previously and the client (pro se again) had been ordered to prepare the order. She had not done so. I suggested she include a clause for attorney’s fees if she was going to file the same motion for enforcement again to have served. She agreed, but was still not willing to retain me to redraft the motion. The court eventually struck most of the language in the motion for enforcement as not specific enough to enforce. The case was not dismissed, but would be if a more proper motion was not submitted. I spent almost an hour explaining why this document did not fly despite her having obtained the form from “reliable sources”. The court set another date for the final modification order to be submitted. She retained me to prepare that document. We also agreed on a retainer fee for me to re-write the motion for enforcement to be done after the final order had been prepared and entered. I submitted a separate digital invoice for each and the retainer for preparing the final order was paid. The client rejected several drafts of the proposed final order, insisting on language not contained in the court’s ruling. I apparently was not helping her husband’s grievance filed against her opposing counsel (I was asked to assist with that, also, but declined) by sticking to the court’s ruling . Then she told me her “other attorney” had told her that my first draft was what was needed and so to file that one (I guess that attorney knew what 2+2 was). At this point, I cancelled my invoice for the retainer to re-write the motion for enforcement. I still prepared and filed the proposed order as I was hired to do. The client retained other counsel to appear for its entry and my draft was what was eventually entered. Thus, I was never retained to redraft her motion for enforcement. Her other statements aren’t any more accurate, but they aren’t about anything that could be documented, including the dire predictions. I leave the rest of her statement to the reader to judge. I tried my best to satisfy the needs of this client, but most of the problems with this client’s case was due to her *pro se* representation before my involvement. The rest due to ignoring the advice of counsel in favor of her own legal “expertise”.
Posted by ROBERT | October 3, 2013
I have unfortunately had the pleasure of working with James on 2 different cases and both times he worked his hardest to get the best results possible. i have been extremely satisfied with the services provided and will 100% use his services in the future if needed and will spread the word about his...
Posted by Jessica | June 18, 2013
I was very pleased with the communication of Mr. James Roark. He knew what I needed to have done and made it happen. I was very impressed on how well he stays in communication. If I ever need a lawyer for family law or child support issues again I will be contacting him for his services. I also recom...
Posted by Greg | May 15, 2013
One the most trustworthy attorney I have ever known Would not even consider using someone else as my attorney.
"I have known Lawyer Roark for many years..James has always been ahead of the curve when it comes to technology used in the legal profession..I have seen the results of his legal work and it is excellent..James totally devotes his energy to the representation of people who need legal services..His reputation in the legal community is of the highest degree..I highly recommend Lawyer Roark..."
"I endorse this lawyer. He is well versed and knowledgeable in Texas Criminal Law and Procedure. I would recommend this attorney"
"I endorse Mr. Roark based on his knowledge of the law and experience handling family law and criminal cases."
"I endorse this lawyer. He is very knowledgeable in the areas of criminal defense, family and juvenile law and cares about his clients, profession and the community."
"I endorse this lawyer. He is very knowledgeable across many fields, including Family Law. He regularly answers many questions intelligently, and his clients like him."
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Family lawyer
Contracts and agreements lawyer
Family lawyer
2012
Pro Bono Award, Lone Star Legal Aid
1989 - Present
proprietor, James D. Roark, Attorney
1990 - Present
Courtyard Condominium Homeowners Assn.Former President,
mediated settlement. H received acreage and homes and 30% of retirement. W awarded 70% of retirement and all stocks, remains in 2nd house as long as her mother is alive.
Dismissed
Dismissed
H awarded 50% of community equity in house and granted standard visitation with the child.
Dismissed (all 3)
H awarded 100% property, sole managing conservator of children
1989
Legal Answers
Legal Guides
If I'm on probation and I had 2 dirty ua's and missed 1 clerk payment. What are my possible out comes?
19 Sep 2019
How long does it take for a court-appointed attorney to visit his client in jail after he is appointed
09 Sep 2019
If you inherit money from a deceased parent, does your wife have a right to that money if you plan on getting a divorce?
09 Sep 2019