James D. Roark

James D. Roark

4.3
Rating: 7.9

Licensed for 36 years

Family Lawyer at Houston, TX
Practice Areas: Family, Criminal Defense, Juvenile

2100 West Loop S Ste 900, Houston, TX

About James

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Family 50%

Divorce and child custody matters are highly emotional and require the objectivity of a seasoned attorney to see you through it. While dividing and coming out whole is impossible, I zealously strive to protect the property and parental rights of my clients. Most importantly, I work continuously to maintain compassion and humanity throughout the process.

37 years

50%
Criminal Defense 40%

The need for a competent criminal lawyer begins at the time a citizen is only *suspected* of a crime. You need someone to fight for reasonable bail and help you obtain it. You should be informed before deciding to take your case to trial and work hard for the most favorable outcome possible. Even minor criminal charges have unimaginable consequences. I make sure you understand your case and your options.

37 years

40%
Juvenile Law 10%

These days, kids aren't sent to the principal's office, they are handcuffed and taken to a police station. Simply writing on a bathroom wall can have them facing felony charges (seriously). Getting a lawyer involved early can prevent abuses inherent in today's juvenile justice system and help parents understand the process along the way.

37 years

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 20 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Texas for 36 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 1989

Eligible to Practice in Texas

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of James D. Roark

2100 West Loop S Ste 900, Houston, TX, 77027-3522

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

James D. Roark's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.3 /5.0

6 Client Reviews

5 star (5)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (1)

Posted by Christina | October 11, 2018 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Great lawyer

Roark is a fabulous lawyer!! He works quick to get things done, works hard on your case, he has always called me back in a timely manner, he has always answered my questions.. Roark has been my lawyer for 14+ years.. He always made me feel confident about my case from day one.. When I 1st talked to h...im 14 years ago. He spent 2 hours or so with me on the phone telling me what I needed to do.. He took the time out of his Sunday to help me... Mr. Roark knows his stuff! I've used him myself for a child custody case. My husband has used him and also my dad.. I would absolutely recommend him to anyone!! Mr.Roark is a dam good lawyer!

Posted by anonymous | November 13, 2014

DO NOT HIRE THIS ATTORNEY

This attorney is a slow-witted litigant that refuses to acknowledge current case law. He will do absolutely nothing to improve your disposition once he is retained, and you can have the same result if you remain Pro Se. He contends that there are no limits to the power exercised by family court... trial judges and will do nothing to correct an injustice-a dangerous attitude for an attorney with a client who values their own interests. He will not fight for you! He is less knowledgeable than most learned lay-persons he represents. He is unresponsive, habitually late, poor at communicating with his client, and engages in repeated logical fallacies of assuming those who are not attorneys would not have any knowledge to impart. He refused to acknowledge the local rules of another county--he loves to talk about how they do it in Harris county (something every adjacent county court judge hates and regularly slams attorneys in court for assuming that the same rules apply). In his draft, "that (he) was paid to do," he screwed that up too! This is despite being told he was breaking the local rules (because it wasn't another attorney who told him). He would argue that 2 + 2 equals 3 until another attorney says it's 13 (This number was deliberately chosen as it is even further from the truth). He will immediately trust that as canon and ignore you as you scream, "It's 4!" Here is my prediction for his latest debacle: The proposed order he drafted will be rejected, the alternative copy filed by opposing counsel will be accepted -- despite the inclusion of provisions that were never filed, tried, and ordered, because he refused to acknowledge the local rules. As a result, the petitioner will get away with not allowing visitation with the child this past Summer. On an enforcement action he was paid to rewrite a Pro Se draft to ensure it would not be stricken. He took the Pro Se copy, added a sentence about attorney's fees, and filed it as is. It was stricken. So I am out money and no closer to holding my ex accountable for refusing to let me see my child this past Summer. He values the word of opposing counsel over his own client and operates in an elitist manner assuming no one without a law degree could know better. He will not do research. He has refused to review the petitioner's proposed order, essentially going blind into a court room with no preparation to counter the other party's assertions. Any client of his will work harder than he does, and most efforts by his client will be centered on keeping him in line. He is a mid-level paralegal at best. If you want to know exactly what it is like to be represented by him, don't show up to hearings, let the other side get everything they want by default, take about $1700, and then burn it. That is exactly the same result as retaining James Roark.

James Roark

Replied last January 27, 2015

I certainly disagree with this former client’s rendition of the matter, even aside from the rude remarks. I was never retained to draft a motion for enforcement. The client prepared her own motion, filed it (pro se), then brought it to me telling me it had been served on the opposing party and a court date was set. I was retained to appear on that date and argue *her* motion. So when I appeared, I learned that the motion she gave me was one that she filed AFTER the one she had served on the other party. As a result, the court did not hear it. Another complication in that case was that the court had ruled on a modification action 4 or 5 months previously and the client (pro se again) had been ordered to prepare the order. She had not done so. I suggested she include a clause for attorney’s fees if she was going to file the same motion for enforcement again to have served. She agreed, but was still not willing to retain me to redraft the motion. The court eventually struck most of the language in the motion for enforcement as not specific enough to enforce. The case was not dismissed, but would be if a more proper motion was not submitted. I spent almost an hour explaining why this document did not fly despite her having obtained the form from “reliable sources”. The court set another date for the final modification order to be submitted. She retained me to prepare that document. We also agreed on a retainer fee for me to re-write the motion for enforcement to be done after the final order had been prepared and entered. I submitted a separate digital invoice for each and the retainer for preparing the final order was paid. The client rejected several drafts of the proposed final order, insisting on language not contained in the court’s ruling. I apparently was not helping her husband’s grievance filed against her opposing counsel (I was asked to assist with that, also, but declined) by sticking to the court’s ruling . Then she told me her “other attorney” had told her that my first draft was what was needed and so to file that one (I guess that attorney knew what 2+2 was). At this point, I cancelled my invoice for the retainer to re-write the motion for enforcement. I still prepared and filed the proposed order as I was hired to do. The client retained other counsel to appear for its entry and my draft was what was eventually entered. Thus, I was never retained to redraft her motion for enforcement. Her other statements aren’t any more accurate, but they aren’t about anything that could be documented, including the dire predictions. I leave the rest of her statement to the reader to judge. I tried my best to satisfy the needs of this client, but most of the problems with this client’s case was due to her *pro se* representation before my involvement. The rest due to ignoring the advice of counsel in favor of her own legal “expertise”.

Posted by ROBERT | October 3, 2013

Thanks for the terrific job and support

I have unfortunately had the pleasure of working with James on 2 different cases and both times he worked his hardest to get the best results possible. i have been extremely satisfied with the services provided and will 100% use his services in the future if needed and will spread the word about his... terrific service and understanding of the law.

Posted by Jessica | June 18, 2013

Very pleased!

I was very pleased with the communication of Mr. James Roark. He knew what I needed to have done and made it happen. I was very impressed on how well he stays in communication. If I ever need a lawyer for family law or child support issues again I will be contacting him for his services. I also recom...mend him to any of my friends.

Posted by Greg | May 15, 2013

Greg Ortega, President of G&D Custom Works, Inc.

One the most trustworthy attorney I have ever known Would not even consider using someone else as my attorney.

See All Client Reviews

James D. Roark's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse James
Hovanes Margarian headshot
Hovanes Margarian

Unknown lawyer | Mar 20

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Robert O. W. Pelton headshot
Robert Pelton

Family lawyer | Oct 15

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I have known Lawyer Roark for many years..James has always been ahead of the curve when it comes to technology used in the legal profession..I have seen the results of his legal work and it is excellent..James totally devotes his energy to the representation of people who need legal services..His reputation in the legal community is of the highest degree..I highly recommend Lawyer Roark..."

Gary Churak headshot
Gary Churak

Criminal defense lawyer | May 28

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. He is well versed and knowledgeable in Texas Criminal Law and Procedure. I would recommend this attorney"

JaPaula C Kemp headshot
JaPaula Kemp

Family lawyer | Sep 25

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Mr. Roark based on his knowledge of the law and experience handling family law and criminal cases."

Christian K. Lassen II headshot
Christian Lassen

Unknown lawyer | Sep 04

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Top-notch attorney. Highly respected in the legal community."

Laura Kalish headshot
Laura Kalish

Criminal defense lawyer | Jun 28

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. He is very knowledgeable in the areas of criminal defense, family and juvenile law and cares about his clients, profession and the community."

Brian Douglas Walters headshot
Brian Walters

Family lawyer | Jun 24

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. He is very knowledgeable across many fields, including Family Law. He regularly answers many questions intelligently, and his clients like him."

View All Endorsements
Gary Churak headshot
Gary Churak

Criminal defense lawyer

JaPaula C Kemp headshot
JaPaula Kemp

Criminal defense lawyer

Mark Allen Land headshot
Mark Land

Family lawyer

Laura Kalish headshot
Laura Kalish

Contracts and agreements lawyer

Brian Douglas Walters headshot
Brian Walters

Family lawyer

Experience

Rating:  7.9 (Very Good)

Honors

2012

Pro Bono Award, Lone Star Legal Aid

Work Experience

1989 - Present

proprietor, James D. Roark, Attorney

Associations

1990 - Present

Courtyard Condominium Homeowners Assn.

Former President,

Sample of Legal Cases

Divorce - marital property issues

mediated settlement. H received acreage and homes and 30% of retirement. W awarded 70% of retirement and all stocks, remains in 2nd house as long as her mother is alive.

Possession / Use of Criminal Instrument

Dismissed

Possession Controlled Substance 400 g more

Dismissed

Divorce - marital property / child custody issues

H awarded 50% of community equity in house and granted standard visitation with the child.

Assault (3 cases, 3 defendants)

Dismissed (all 3)

Divorce - marital property / child custody issues

H awarded 100% property, sole managing conservator of children

See More Legal Cases

Education

1989

University of Houston

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution