$ 250-375 per hour
On November 5, 2020, I was BOARD CERTIFIED IN CIVIL TRIAL LAW by the NATIONAL BOARD OF TRIAL ADVOCACY. The experience and additional requirements to become Board Certified is very intensive and result in only a small percentage of lawyers like myself meeting the onerous requirements. My website details my expererience and justifies my status. Please feel free to review me at: As for your case, please call me when you're serious about going to trial. Most lawyers posture for a final trial (before the court or jury) but rarely see or want to go to the Court room in front of a Judge or Jury for a trial on the merits. Rest assured, if necessary, I will go to trial for you and will not just take your money and try to talk you out of a trial. I do believe that settling cases is often beneficial for everyone, but be very confident knowing that I am very willing for a reasonable fee to help you take your case to the finish-line - judge or jury!
PS: My primary practice is not arbitration. I have not been able to get this site to change it. My primary practice is civil litigation.
$ 250-375 per hour
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Texas
Acquired: 2003
Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2016
9288 Wichita Trail, Frisco, TX, 75033
6521 Preston Road, Suite 100, Plano, TX, 75024
17480 N. Dallas Parkway, Suite 200, Dallas, TX, 75287
45 Client Reviews
Showing 6 - 10 of 10 reviews | Cost of Services
Posted by Brandon | April 10, 2020 | Hired Attorney
Resolved our lease dispute!
Chad was great from day 1! He reviewed our case and gave a fair assessment and our strengths and weaknesses and what he realistically get us in a settlement. He also was clear about what his fees would be. He kept us updated throughout the entire process and was able get us a quick settlement in medi...
Posted by Richard | July 25, 2017 | Hired Attorney
Superb lawyer !
I was sued by a multi-millionaire that was trying to run me out of money so he could get a default judgement. I spent a huge amount of money on a lawyer that, in two years, did not do anything. He just ran up the bill. That lawyer ended up SUING ME. I hired Chad, and in one month he shut down the r...
Posted by Janice | October 24, 2013
Proud To Say He Is My Lawyer
In our first meeting I told Chad, that due to our health problems we had no money and very little Online computer skills. I advised him of this because, the first Lawyer I talked to said he could not help us and we didn't need a lawyer and go on line to do it ourself. Chad, advised us that we need...
Posted by anonymous | November 08, 2011
Very Knowledgeable, Creative, and Trustworthy
I hired Chad to handle and eviction. He was extremely knowledgeable about the law. He was also creative and innovative with his approach and strategy. I found him on google and was impressed with his video of happy clients on his website. See www.norcrosslaw.com I also found his firm very fair w...
Posted by anonymous | October 05, 2011
Chad Norcross talks a good talk but does not deliver.
I have paid this lawyer and he was to write a letter to my mortgage company. His bills shows some firm I have not heard from and the mortgage compnay is calling me everyday and I hired a him to handle this and he has done nothing. Will not even send me a copy of a letter he supposedly sent because o...
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2016.
Public Reprimand issued in TX, 2016
updated on 02/07/2017Public reprimand means an attorney did something wrong but may still practice law. The State gives the lawyer a public reprimand in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior. Details of the infraction are made part of the public record.
“This matter related to an ambiguous text message that was sent to the lawyer that did not provide the lawyer with sufficient information about an upcoming court setting. In the case the Court also could not show with credible evidence that it had sent the trial notice to the lawyer either. The lawyer being unaware of the trial did not appear. However, the lawyer settled the matter in order to save the time and expense of a lengthy legal proceeding. The client suffered no damages at all.”
Member
Member
2001
JD - Juris Doctor
1994
English
Spanish