$ 250-375 per hour
On November 5, 2020, I was BOARD CERTIFIED IN CIVIL TRIAL LAW by the NATIONAL BOARD OF TRIAL ADVOCACY. The experience and additional requirements to become Board Certified is very intensive and result in only a small percentage of lawyers like myself meeting the onerous requirements. My website details my expererience and justifies my status. Please feel free to review me at: As for your case, please call me when you're serious about going to trial. Most lawyers posture for a final trial (before the court or jury) but rarely see or want to go to the Court room in front of a Judge or Jury for a trial on the merits. Rest assured, if necessary, I will go to trial for you and will not just take your money and try to talk you out of a trial. I do believe that settling cases is often beneficial for everyone, but be very confident knowing that I am very willing for a reasonable fee to help you take your case to the finish-line - judge or jury!
PS: My primary practice is not arbitration. I have not been able to get this site to change it. My primary practice is civil litigation.
$ 250-375 per hour
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Texas
Acquired: 2003
Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2016
9288 Wichita Trail, Frisco, TX, 75033
6521 Preston Road, Suite 100, Plano, TX, 75024
17480 N. Dallas Parkway, Suite 200, Dallas, TX, 75287
46 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 5 of 15 reviews | Responsiveness
Posted by robert | January 09, 2026 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes
construction lawsuit
mr.norcross helped me on a lien/lawsuit we had against a customer that we did work for (fire claim)...customer owed us over 40k. our previous attorney was moving extremely slow on the matter. mr cross, came and did his thing.. we got lawsuit settled. thank you sir for your help.
Posted by Ashley | August 26, 2024 | Real Estate
Super Helpful!
Chad quickly returned my call, answered my questions and provided the clarity I needed to make a decision on a property that involved a property line dispute/encroachment. I am so grateful to have found him!
Posted by Darlene Rogatsky | June 05, 2023 | Hired Attorney | Contracts & Agreements
Trusted
After 1-1/2 months of shopping for an attorney that would take my case, Mr. Norcross actually answered the phone personally, listened, called me back in the evening same day, after reading my contractual documents, and consented to take on the case. Majority of contact on my case has been with him d...
Posted by Tonya | May 09, 2023 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes
Outstanding
I was served and had to appear in court that same week. I was hard-pressed to find a litigator so quickly and on the day before, finally found Chad Norcross...and for that, I will be forever grateful. Mr. Norcross could've used my need for his gain but instead, he took the time to go over every asp...
Posted by anonymous | April 30, 2023
Do not hire this attorney
I approached this attorney about a possible legal matter and provided him with some documents before having retained him as my attorney. He promised to get back to me as soon as he reviewed them so we could discuss a possible strategy and I could possibly retain him as my attorney. To this date, afte...
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2016.
Public Reprimand issued in TX, 2016
updated on 02/07/2017Public reprimand means an attorney did something wrong but may still practice law. The State gives the lawyer a public reprimand in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior. Details of the infraction are made part of the public record.
“This matter related to an ambiguous text message that was sent to the lawyer that did not provide the lawyer with sufficient information about an upcoming court setting. In the case the Court also could not show with credible evidence that it had sent the trial notice to the lawyer either. The lawyer being unaware of the trial did not appear. However, the lawyer settled the matter in order to save the time and expense of a lengthy legal proceeding. The client suffered no damages at all.”
Member
Member
2001
JD - Juris Doctor
1994
English
Spanish