David Brian Kempston

David Brian Kempston

also known as David B. Kempston

5.0
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 33 years

Workers compensation Lawyer at Minneapolis, MN
Practice Areas: Workers Compensation

3340 Northdale Blvd NW #140, Minneapolis, MN

About David

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

Cost

Contingency

20%-25%


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Minnesota for 33 years

State: Minnesota

Acquired: 1992

Authorized to Practice

No misconduct found

Location

Mottaz & Sisk Injury Law

3340 Northdale Blvd NW #140, Minneapolis, MN, 55448

Mottaz & Sisk Injury Law

3340 Northdale Boulevard. N.W., Suite 140, Coon Rapids, MN, 55448

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

David Brian Kempston's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

312 Client Reviews

Showing 26 - 30 of 73 reviews | Practice Area Knowledge

Posted by anonymous | April 14, 2021 | Hired Attorney | Workers Compensation

Client

David Kempston is knowledgeable and experienced in the Workers Compensation field. David walked me through all the steps in the process before we started. If I had any concerns or questions he did not hesitate to return my call or email. Because if this Mr Kempston made the experiance alot less st...ressful.

Posted by Michael | February 23, 2021 | Hired Attorney | Workers Compensation

Work Comp Lawyer

I had hired this lawyer due to a work injury I had at work. David was on top of things from day one. He had always kept me in the loop on all things from the get go. David would return your email usually within an hour if not sooner which to me is awesome. Overall a top notch lawyer. I would highly r...ecommend him. His firm is the best in my books.

Posted by Ben | December 31, 2020 | Hired Attorney | Workers Compensation

As promised, David was a great guide through the worker's comp side of the world.

David helped me win my worker's comp case in a very professional way while remaining approachable and reliable. Communication was always easy, and his explanations of the legal realm were concise, easy to digest, and, most importantly, accurate and fair.

Posted by Anita | December 01, 2020 | Hired Attorney | Insurance

A lifesaver when you need him!

We needed help on a last-minute call from a denial on an insurance claim and he was able to help us through some of the toughest situations. He always reinsured us that it was all gonna work out and it did. I would recommend him to anyone.

Posted by James | November 16, 2020 | Hired Attorney | Workers Compensation

Would definitely recommend for a Workers Comp claim

Mr. Kempston has been very informative with all the information on my workers comp claim. He was very easy to work with over the phone considering I don’t live in Minnesota. Very prompt in responding to any questions I have and would definitely recommend him to anyone!!

See All Client Reviews

David Brian Kempston's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse David
Jay T Hartman headshot
Jay Hartman

Workers compensation lawyer | Oct 08

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"David is one of the most formidable opponents I face in my workers' compensation defense practice. He is a consummate professional, skilled trial lawyer and passionate advocate for his clients. Quite simply, David is at the top of his field and a credit to his profession."

View All Endorsements
Jeremiah William Sisk headshot
Jeremiah Sisk

Workers compensation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2017

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2017

Anoka County Lawyer of the Year, Anoka County Bar Association

2016

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2015

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2014

Mpls Work Comp Law- Claimants "Lawyer of the Year", Best Lawyers in America

2014

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2013

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2012

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2011

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2010

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2009

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2008

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2007

Top 100 MN Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2006

Top 100 MN Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2005

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2004

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2003

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2002

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2001

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2000

Rising Star, SuperLawyers

2000

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

1999

Rising Star, SuperLawyers

1989

Arthur Lynip Award for Outstanding English Literature Student, Westmont College

1988

Arthur Lynip Award for Outstanding English Literature Student, Westmont College

N/A

Client Champion Award, Martindale-Hubbell

N/A

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1996 - Present

Attorney, The Law Office of Thomas D Mottaz

1900 - Present

Associate, Mottaz & Sisk Injury Law

1992 - 1996

Attorney, Gilmore, Aafedt, Forde, Anderson, & Gray, PA

Associations

1996 - Present

Anoka County Bar Association

1992 - Present

Minnesota State Bar Association

Sample of Legal Cases

Metzger v Turk, Inc.

affirmed

Metzger v Turk, Inc.

affirmed

See More Legal Cases

Education

1992

University of Minnesota Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

N/A

Westmont College

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2017

New Lawyers Leadership Conference

That's Why They Call it Practicing Law

2017

National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Customer Service Tips from a Plaintiff Lawyer

2017

Minnesota Association for Justice

Presenting at Hearing: Preparation and Performance

2017

Anoka County Bar Association

That's Why They Call it Practicing Law

2017

2017 Minnesota Workers' Compensation Symposium

Tales from the Dark Side

2017

2017 Minnesota State Bar Association Convention

That's Why They Call it Practicing Law

2016

2016 Minnesota Worker's Compensation Symposium

Tales from the Dark Side- Decisions, Decisions

2015

The 30th Annual Workers' Compensation Institute

Co-Chair

2014

The 2014 Minnesota Workers' Compensatoin Deskbook Seminar

Proving whether the Injury "Arose Out Of" Employment after Dykhoff

2014

Mayo Clinic Health System Occupational Medicine Monthly Provider Roundtable

Understanding the Basics of Minnesota Workers' Compensation

2014

A Workers' Compensation Seminar

Sharpen Your Skills- A Workers' Compensation seminar: Working With Your Opponent

2013

Work Comp Work Shop

Analysis of 2013 Changes to MN Work Comp Law

2012

The Minnesota Workers' Compensation Deskbook Seminar

Medical Benefits

2012

The 27th Annual Workers' Compensation Institue

Time and Project Management

2012

Globe University Panel Presentation

Legal Ethics

2011

The 26th Annual Workers' Compensation Institute

Intervention: Practice Tips and Strategies

2010

The 25th Annual Workers' Compensation Institute

Co-Chair

2010

2010 Workers' Compensation Seminar

Client Relations

Publications

2020

book "Lessons Learned on the Run"

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution