Norman Michael Murburg Jr

Norman Michael Murburg Jr

also known as Mike Murburg

4.7
Rating: 7.9

Licensed for 39 years

Social Security & Disability Lawyer at Tampa, FL
Practice Areas: Social Security, Appeals

15501 N Florida Ave, Tampa, FL

About Norman

Biography

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Social Security & Disability 92%

I have handled Social Security Disability Claims and hearings at the administrative law level for almost 30 years on an ongoing and steady basis.

41 years | 4,500 cases

92%
Appeals 8%

We regularly handle Social Security Disability (SSDI) and Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) Disability appeals at the Administrative law and Hearing levels as well as in Federal District Court. We are additionally certified to represent our clients in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals and before The United States Supreme Court.

41 years | 2,000 cases

8%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Contingency

1%-25%


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Florida for 39 years

State: Florida

Acquired: 1986

Member in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Washington for 36 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1990

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Norman Michael Murburg Jr

15501 N Florida Ave, Tampa, FL, 33613-1245

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Norman Michael Murburg Jr's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.7 /5.0

23 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (23) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | 1 star

Posted by Steve | August 04, 2017 | Social Security Disability

Very disappointing

Gruff, flippant, condescending and unprofessional. I’ve dealt with lawyers for various other issues and have never had an experience such as this. The office is a disaster which should have been our first clue but I won’t judge a book by its cover. My wife has a serious medical condition and we were ...just hoping to get some guidance as to filing for disability. This guy just couldn’t be bothered and copped an attitude when we asked even the simplest question. Well Mr. Murburg you’re the expert on disability claims which is why we’re seeking your guidance. He treats you as if you’re a lazy student that didn’t read the textbook. Mostly refers you to the website and acts as if you're an idiot. He appeared disinterested from the start and I’m not sure if he was drunk or about to pass out during the entire consultation. The only time he perked up is when he boasted about some case he won last year. Then right back to the get out of my office attitude. I admit I read the reviews about this guy before we went but I wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt. Maybe he cared about helping people at some point but it’s obvious that is not the case anymore. It took all my restraint to not knock this guy on his ass for being rude and condescending to my wife.

Norman Murburg

Replied last August 04, 2017

Even a good man can have a bad day. I am giving Steve the benefit of the doubt and presume that his wife had not conveyed to him prior to arrival that which my secretary had annunciated on numerous occasions about my policy of not counseling people who are working full time. I told my secretary that I would see Mrs.S if she needed me to tell her that in person. The appointment was set. Mrs. S obviously did not convey what my secretary had told her to her husband. I can see now how and why S's expectations might have been exaggerated and not met thereby. I met and counseled S and his wife within the bounds of my available time and the law. My time is devoted to those who can't work and don't work because they are disabled. I limit my practice to in person consultation only for people who can't work and are not working due to their disability. Those, who are often without working spouses, are also most in need of immediate aid as they have no income or means of support in order to live and sometimes die while waiting for an adjudication. At a minimum, to be found disabled, one must have been out of work and unable to work due to a medically severe condition for at least a year. (Please refer to my FAQS and You Tube videos at disabilityattorney.net). I am fortunate to have many contact my office about their claims. The filing of a SSI/SSDI claim can be an area rife with potential fraud, so I simply do not counsel people who are working full time as to filing a claim. To do so may help subordinate a fraud and constitute a felony against the United States Government. Because of the potential illegality of filing a disability claim while working full time, it is my policy to do in-person in-office consultations for only those who are not working and cannot work due to a severe mental or physical disability or handicap. Again, working full time and claiming SSI/SSDI can amount to a crime that carries a 5 year prison term and I choose not to be involved in the potentialities that such a situation might bring. After more than 30 years practicing law, I know enough to stay away from prohibitive waters. I am sorry that S disagrees with my policy. I disagree as to S's assessment of my demeanor. It was cordial, relaxed and professional. After our conference, I thanked Steve and his wife in my lobby in front of others for coming in and I did again refer Steve to my website. I offered our help with setting up an application with the SSA or have his wife to apply on line & when the time came. I could and would counsel them further. As to my being "drunk", for the record, since my year on the TV show The Biggest Loser and losing over 150 lbs and getting myself healthy after my son's death in the US. Army at Ft. Bragg in 2008, I don't smoke, drink, use drugs or alcohol. As to any "rudeness, disrespect or condescension" toward Steve's wife, one can only imagine. Nothing of fact has he given upon which one might base a reasonable conclusion other than his own feelings and my declining to answer certain questions and directing the two to my website. Also, other than a "hello" to her, I had no dialogue with S's wife whatsoever. As to my "gruffness", I am a 60 + a no frills, straight forward straight shooting kind of guy. If politely getting to the point referring people to my website is "gruff", so be it. As to "boasting about a case", I routinely explain when asked about my fees (25% of past due benefits that I get my client or $6,000.00, whichever is the lesser) and use a case where I won back benefits of $107,000.00 & received a $6,000.00 fee and not a 25% fee that would've been over $26,750.00. Steve obviously misunderstood this as a "boast". It was not so intended. As to my office being a "disaster", summer storms outside & a new attorney moving in, can be a bit messy. Wherever one looks one can always find fault. In sum, I'm sorry Steve had un-met expectations of me and wish him and his wife peace & only the best.

Posted by anonymous | December 21, 2015 | Personal Injury

Bad experience with this guy

Had an interview with this guy scheduled. I went there 15 minutes early i saw a guy in some shorts and a very sweaty undershirt walking around in the back. Lady called me and said the lawyer was ready for me and i went back and it was him i was like wtf?? Then to make this situation worse the guy did...nt even shake my hand, just sat down and started talking about why taking my case would be difficult, gave me some paperwork for my DR to fill out and sent me on my way! And as i was leaving i still didnt get a hand shake. I took my business elsewhere. Never felt so disrespected. I found another lawyer the same day. Thanks

Norman Murburg

Replied last December 21, 2015

After 29 years and 5000 SSDI/SSI cases, $50,000,000.00 in benefits and evaluating over 20,000 claims, lecturing & teaching lawyers nationally how to prosecute SSDI Claims, it's best to be frank. I am not everybody's cup of tea. This young man had some urgency so my staff scheduled him in on my day off. I had just returned from work on my ranch and rather than rudely make him wait as I showered & changed, I met him in our conference room. Though Florida Bar Rules, the Federal Courts and the U.S. Supreme Court, before whom I am licensed forbid me from say much, for those under 55 youth makes cases difficult to prove. Entitlement to SSDI/SSI is not simply proof of a disabling condition supported by medical evidence. It requires more. Besides the application of Vocational Grids to a claim, at ages 40, 45, 50, 55, there is a presumption among judges that there are many unskilled jobs exist in the economy one can do seated w/an option to sit & stand and require little training to do, even with disabilities: jobs like surveillance system monitor, ticket seller, a gate guard, parts assembler, produce sorter, just to mention a few. This man was a "Younger Individual" and w/o objective limitations, proof of the case was "difficult", if not impossible w/o Questionnaires completed by his physician. The SSA sends files to their own MDs to evaluate & give opinions that a claimant can work & the claim is denied and stays denied w/o other evidence to the contrary by way of completed RFC Questionnaires that counter the SSA's decision. So we have clients under 55 have these completed before we take a case. With the SSA's Disability Trust fund in danger of bankruptcy in 2016 Congress has pressured judges to reduce rates of favorable decisions. It has had an effect. Judges who pay 50% of the claims that come before them have become a scarce commodity. Because federal law limits the amount of attorney's fees that can be awarded and the high cost of prosecuting SSDI/SSI cases, attorneys' time and resources have to wisely be spent. Cases must be properly initiated to obtain a favorable outcome for a client. Too often I see clients w/ cases taken by lawyers hoping to get lucky only to "dump" both the client and the case before hearing. We do our best to avoid this before opening a file by having clients and their physicians complete these forms. After 29 years, my clients don't need me to be lucky. They need me to be the best attorney for building and trying their case: better than any other attorney that they can hire. Yes, I do have a very laid back dress code sometimes, especially on one of my few my days off. I no longer wear a suit and tie to work unless I am going to be in court and prefer to allow my staff to dress comfortably as well since comfort makes work easier. Yes, clients will see me in ways that they might otherwise expect a "stuffed shirt" attorney to be. I am sorry that this fellow found his early accommodation & my appearance so offensive and found it disrespectful that I did not shake his hand. I meant nothing by it. I am also sorry about the way he feels. I have no control over his feelings. I will say that I do have control over the cases I take and who I am and how to best win my client's cases. If nothing, I am a straight shooter: better a bitter truth than a sweet lie. Life is too short to do otherwise. The reality is that some folks want a guy in a suit who shakes hands. I may not always dress up to TV lawyer standards but we take only the cases we believe we can prove and win. I am not in the business of building false trust or giving fiat hopes to my clients. Additionally, as a health matter, during flu season we don't go out of our way to shake hands with others out of respect for our many clients who have autoimmune diseases and can die from the flu. I am grateful that this person took the time to meet with me and on behalf of my partner and staff, we wish him & his representative only the best of luck.

See All Client Reviews

Norman Michael Murburg Jr's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Norman
Carolyn Elizabeth Wagner headshot
Carolyn Wagner

Social Security & Disability lawyer | Jul 08

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. I' had the privilege of attending law school with Mr. Murburg. From my experience -- over the past 37 years--he is Incredibly well versed in the social security arena, Very experienced litigator and highly principled. If I had a social security matter I would not call anyone else."

David E Siar headshot
David Siar

Social Security & Disability lawyer | Nov 18

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Mike and I have known each other for nearly 30 years; first as opposing counsel, later as co-counsel, and always as friends. Mike is remarkably knowledgeable regarding SSDI and RRB cases, and has a sterling reputation in the legal community. I would not hesitate to refer a friend to him."

Kerry H. Brown headshot
Kerry Brown

Unknown lawyer | Oct 06

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Mike is smart and tenacious."

Byron Gust Broun headshot
Byron Broun

Social Security & Disability lawyer | Oct 06

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. I am not in the habit of endorsing my "competitors", however, Mr. Murburg is worthy of serious consideration if you are seeking competent and ethical representation from an attorney who practices social security law."

Edward A Doskey headshot
Edward Doskey

Social Security & Disability lawyer | Oct 03

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"In the early days of my career Mr. Murburg and I were opposing counsel on a number of cases. I earned a great deal of respect for him and knew him to be highly competent and of the utmost ethical and professional character. Since then we have come to work together and I am out of counsel with his firm. I can recommend Mr. Murburg without reservation."

View All Endorsements
Edward A Doskey headshot
Edward Doskey

Personal injury lawyer

Byron Gust Broun headshot
Byron Broun

Social Security & Disability lawyer

Experience

Rating:  7.9 (Very Good)

Honors

1985

Sandra Barr Scholarship, FSU College of Law

1973

Scholarship, Princeton Class of 1903

Work Experience

1990 - 1992

Lead Trial Counsel, Yanchuck, Thompson, Young and Breman, PA

1986 - 1990

Assistant Attorney, Sixth Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County

1986 - 2017

Founder, Senior Partner, Lead Trial Attorney, Mike Murburg, P.A.

Associations

1986 - Present

Florida Bar

Practicing Attorney

Sample of Legal Cases

David Davis v. The Commissioner of Social Security

Santa won his disability claim and we won his case.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1986

Florida State University College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1977

Princeton University

B.A.

Speaking Engagements

2015

Tampa, March 6, 2015

Handling a Social Security Disability Case

Publications

Languages

English

Spanish

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution