also known as Mike Murburg
Mike has been a lawyer for over thirty years. For the past 20 years he has limited his practice primarily to Social Security Disability matters and select Railroad Retirement Board disability claims. He has personally tried over 5,000 Social Security disability cases and has obtained over $27,000, in past due benefits for his clients. Though his main office is in Tampa, Mike practices both locally, regionally and nationally. In order to help claimants who may or may not want or need an attorney, Mike has created his website "" as an information and referral source and has written the entire content of the site including a detailed section on Frequently Asked Questions and has created downloadable forms that people who visit the site may use free of charge. Mike has also produced over 100 You Tube video informationals on Social Security Disability and numerous others on related railroad retirement disability topics that may be googled as "Michael Murburg" or may be found on the links at the site. (Please note that the Mike Murburg whom you google was also a contestant on the show The Biggest Loser Season 16.) Mike has also lectured other lawyers professionally on Social Security Disability and on fitness and weight loss topics.
Educationally, Mike graduated from Princeton, with an A.B. in history in 1977. He graduated with honors from the Florida State University College of law, J.D. in 1986. Mike was admitted to practice in Florida in 1986, the Federal Courts for the Middle District of Florida and the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, to the Court of Appeals for Veterans’ Claim, the Washington State Bar and the United States Supreme Court. Mike is a member in good standing in each of the Bar s stated above and is a sustaining member of the National Organization for Social Security Claimants’ Representatives. Past experience of relevance would include work as a prosecuting attorney from 1986-1990 and as a personal injury trial lawyer 1990 - 2000. He has tried in excess of 100 jury trials.
Mike is a straight shooter and won't sugar coat his opinion. An avid fisherman, he would rather fish than cut bait. He wont pull any punches and will give it to you straight. His main office (where he dresses in very casual attire) is located in Tampa, however; he also has offices located in New Port Richey, Hudson/Spring Hill, Dade City and Inverness where he can meet his more rural clients by appointment. Mike can be found most often tringy disability cases at the Tampa, St. Petersburg, Orlando, Clearwater and Ocala Social Security Offices of Disability Adjudication and Review.
Since Mike also represents Social Security Disability and RRB claimants nationwide he has recently tried cases as far south as Ponce on the island of Puerto Rico and as far north as Bangor, Maine and Spokane Washington as well as in Chicago, Boston, Pittsburgh, New York, Philadelphia Indianapolis, Kansas City, Las Vegas, Lexington and Paducha, KY, Charlotte, NC, and Myrtle Beach, SC, just to mention a few reasons why mike is proud to be a Tampa Bay Law Firm with a national practice.
2
Practice Areas
41 years | 4,500 cases
41 years | 2,000 cases
1%-25%
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Florida
Acquired: 1986
No misconduct found
State: Washington
Acquired: 1990
No misconduct found
15501 N Florida Ave, Tampa, FL, 33613-1245
23 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | 1 star
Posted by Steve | August 04, 2017 | Social Security Disability
Very disappointing
Gruff, flippant, condescending and unprofessional. I’ve dealt with lawyers for various other issues and have never had an experience such as this. The office is a disaster which should have been our first clue but I won’t judge a book by its cover. My wife has a serious medical condition and we were ...
Even a good man can have a bad day. I am giving Steve the benefit of the doubt and presume that his wife had not conveyed to him prior to arrival that which my secretary had annunciated on numerous occasions about my policy of not counseling people who are working full time. I told my secretary that I would see Mrs.S if she needed me to tell her that in person. The appointment was set. Mrs. S obviously did not convey what my secretary had told her to her husband. I can see now how and why S's expectations might have been exaggerated and not met thereby. I met and counseled S and his wife within the bounds of my available time and the law. My time is devoted to those who can't work and don't work because they are disabled. I limit my practice to in person consultation only for people who can't work and are not working due to their disability. Those, who are often without working spouses, are also most in need of immediate aid as they have no income or means of support in order to live and sometimes die while waiting for an adjudication. At a minimum, to be found disabled, one must have been out of work and unable to work due to a medically severe condition for at least a year. (Please refer to my FAQS and You Tube videos at disabilityattorney.net). I am fortunate to have many contact my office about their claims. The filing of a SSI/SSDI claim can be an area rife with potential fraud, so I simply do not counsel people who are working full time as to filing a claim. To do so may help subordinate a fraud and constitute a felony against the United States Government. Because of the potential illegality of filing a disability claim while working full time, it is my policy to do in-person in-office consultations for only those who are not working and cannot work due to a severe mental or physical disability or handicap. Again, working full time and claiming SSI/SSDI can amount to a crime that carries a 5 year prison term and I choose not to be involved in the potentialities that such a situation might bring. After more than 30 years practicing law, I know enough to stay away from prohibitive waters. I am sorry that S disagrees with my policy. I disagree as to S's assessment of my demeanor. It was cordial, relaxed and professional. After our conference, I thanked Steve and his wife in my lobby in front of others for coming in and I did again refer Steve to my website. I offered our help with setting up an application with the SSA or have his wife to apply on line & when the time came. I could and would counsel them further. As to my being "drunk", for the record, since my year on the TV show The Biggest Loser and losing over 150 lbs and getting myself healthy after my son's death in the US. Army at Ft. Bragg in 2008, I don't smoke, drink, use drugs or alcohol. As to any "rudeness, disrespect or condescension" toward Steve's wife, one can only imagine. Nothing of fact has he given upon which one might base a reasonable conclusion other than his own feelings and my declining to answer certain questions and directing the two to my website. Also, other than a "hello" to her, I had no dialogue with S's wife whatsoever. As to my "gruffness", I am a 60 + a no frills, straight forward straight shooting kind of guy. If politely getting to the point referring people to my website is "gruff", so be it. As to "boasting about a case", I routinely explain when asked about my fees (25% of past due benefits that I get my client or $6,000.00, whichever is the lesser) and use a case where I won back benefits of $107,000.00 & received a $6,000.00 fee and not a 25% fee that would've been over $26,750.00. Steve obviously misunderstood this as a "boast". It was not so intended. As to my office being a "disaster", summer storms outside & a new attorney moving in, can be a bit messy. Wherever one looks one can always find fault. In sum, I'm sorry Steve had un-met expectations of me and wish him and his wife peace & only the best.
Posted by anonymous | December 21, 2015 | Personal Injury
Bad experience with this guy
Had an interview with this guy scheduled. I went there 15 minutes early i saw a guy in some shorts and a very sweaty undershirt walking around in the back. Lady called me and said the lawyer was ready for me and i went back and it was him i was like wtf?? Then to make this situation worse the guy did...
After 29 years and 5000 SSDI/SSI cases, $50,000,000.00 in benefits and evaluating over 20,000 claims, lecturing & teaching lawyers nationally how to prosecute SSDI Claims, it's best to be frank. I am not everybody's cup of tea. This young man had some urgency so my staff scheduled him in on my day off. I had just returned from work on my ranch and rather than rudely make him wait as I showered & changed, I met him in our conference room. Though Florida Bar Rules, the Federal Courts and the U.S. Supreme Court, before whom I am licensed forbid me from say much, for those under 55 youth makes cases difficult to prove. Entitlement to SSDI/SSI is not simply proof of a disabling condition supported by medical evidence. It requires more. Besides the application of Vocational Grids to a claim, at ages 40, 45, 50, 55, there is a presumption among judges that there are many unskilled jobs exist in the economy one can do seated w/an option to sit & stand and require little training to do, even with disabilities: jobs like surveillance system monitor, ticket seller, a gate guard, parts assembler, produce sorter, just to mention a few. This man was a "Younger Individual" and w/o objective limitations, proof of the case was "difficult", if not impossible w/o Questionnaires completed by his physician. The SSA sends files to their own MDs to evaluate & give opinions that a claimant can work & the claim is denied and stays denied w/o other evidence to the contrary by way of completed RFC Questionnaires that counter the SSA's decision. So we have clients under 55 have these completed before we take a case. With the SSA's Disability Trust fund in danger of bankruptcy in 2016 Congress has pressured judges to reduce rates of favorable decisions. It has had an effect. Judges who pay 50% of the claims that come before them have become a scarce commodity. Because federal law limits the amount of attorney's fees that can be awarded and the high cost of prosecuting SSDI/SSI cases, attorneys' time and resources have to wisely be spent. Cases must be properly initiated to obtain a favorable outcome for a client. Too often I see clients w/ cases taken by lawyers hoping to get lucky only to "dump" both the client and the case before hearing. We do our best to avoid this before opening a file by having clients and their physicians complete these forms. After 29 years, my clients don't need me to be lucky. They need me to be the best attorney for building and trying their case: better than any other attorney that they can hire. Yes, I do have a very laid back dress code sometimes, especially on one of my few my days off. I no longer wear a suit and tie to work unless I am going to be in court and prefer to allow my staff to dress comfortably as well since comfort makes work easier. Yes, clients will see me in ways that they might otherwise expect a "stuffed shirt" attorney to be. I am sorry that this fellow found his early accommodation & my appearance so offensive and found it disrespectful that I did not shake his hand. I meant nothing by it. I am also sorry about the way he feels. I have no control over his feelings. I will say that I do have control over the cases I take and who I am and how to best win my client's cases. If nothing, I am a straight shooter: better a bitter truth than a sweet lie. Life is too short to do otherwise. The reality is that some folks want a guy in a suit who shakes hands. I may not always dress up to TV lawyer standards but we take only the cases we believe we can prove and win. I am not in the business of building false trust or giving fiat hopes to my clients. Additionally, as a health matter, during flu season we don't go out of our way to shake hands with others out of respect for our many clients who have autoimmune diseases and can die from the flu. I am grateful that this person took the time to meet with me and on behalf of my partner and staff, we wish him & his representative only the best of luck.
Social Security & Disability lawyer | Jul 08
Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community
"I endorse this lawyer. I' had the privilege of attending law school with Mr. Murburg. From my experience -- over the past 37 years--he is Incredibly well versed in the social security arena, Very experienced litigator and highly principled. If I had a social security matter I would not call anyone else."
"I endorse this lawyer. Mike and I have known each other for nearly 30 years; first as opposing counsel, later as co-counsel, and always as friends. Mike is remarkably knowledgeable regarding SSDI and RRB cases, and has a sterling reputation in the legal community. I would not hesitate to refer a friend to him."
"I endorse this lawyer. I am not in the habit of endorsing my "competitors", however, Mr. Murburg is worthy of serious consideration if you are seeking competent and ethical representation from an attorney who practices social security law."
"In the early days of my career Mr. Murburg and I were opposing counsel on a number of cases. I earned a great deal of respect for him and knew him to be highly competent and of the utmost ethical and professional character. Since then we have come to work together and I am out of counsel with his firm. I can recommend Mr. Murburg without reservation."
Personal injury lawyer
Social Security & Disability lawyer
1985
Sandra Barr Scholarship, FSU College of Law
1973
Scholarship, Princeton Class of 1903
1990 - 1992
Lead Trial Counsel, Yanchuck, Thompson, Young and Breman, PA
1986 - 1990
Assistant Attorney, Sixth Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County
1986 - 2017
Founder, Senior Partner, Lead Trial Attorney, Mike Murburg, P.A.
1986 - Present
Florida BarPracticing Attorney
Santa won his disability claim and we won his case.
1986
JD - Juris Doctor
1977
B.A.
2015
Handling a Social Security Disability Case
2016
English
Spanish
Legal Guides