Christopher Noel Link

In my experience, this was one of the most deeply disturbing displays of professional conduct I have ever witnessed in family court. What I observed went far beyond aggressive advocacy. The repeated objectification of women, inappropriate sexual comments, and overall lack of courtroom decorum were... shocking - particularly in a family law setting where professionalism, emotional intelligence, and respect should be non-negotiable. Equally concerning was what appeared to be a persistent disregard for courtroom procedure and basic professional expectations. Scheduled return times, courtroom instructions, and procedural rules seemed to be treated casually, creating unnecessary disruption and undermining the seriousness of the proceedings. Most troubling, however, was what I perceived as a broader pattern of litigation conduct designed to intimidate, exhaust, and financially burden rather than seek fair resolution. Filings that, from my perspective, appeared unsupported, misleading, or factually inconsistent created unnecessary expense, stress, and delay. What was especially alarming was the apparent use of retained professionals and “experts” who, in my opinion, did not reflect the neutrality, ethical discipline, or impartiality one expects from individuals presented as objective professionals. Experts are supposed to assist the court through independent, ethical analysis - not function as strategic extensions of litigation gamesmanship. The overall pattern raised serious concerns for me about professional integrity and ethical boundaries. Perhaps most disturbing was the sense that the litigation appeared to function less as a pursuit of justice and more as a self-serving professional ecosystem - where prolonged conflict, excessive billing, and strategic escalation seemed to financially reward those involved while devastating the families caught in the process. Whether intentional or not, the appearance was one of a deeply troubling misalignment between client interests and the incentives driving the litigation. The impression left was not one of principled advocacy, but of a practice style driven by intimidation, spectacle, and profit at the expense of professionalism, truth, and fairness. Family court already places extraordinary emotional and financial strain on families. Attorneys and retained professionals should help bring clarity, integrity, and lawful advocacy - not deepen harm through conduct that diminishes confidence in the justice system. I left profoundly troubled by what I witnessed and with the belief that clients and courts alike deserve far better.

Chris Link and his staff are very professional and prompt. I recently settled my divorce and Chris was professional, witty, and confident. I had a previous lawyer for a year that did nothing and I paid her tons of money. Chris took over my case and got it all resolved and I am very happy with the out...come. I highly recommend Chris if you are looking for a divorce attorney, you will be glad you hired him!

This man is the definition of what's wrong with lawyers. Simple divorce case dragged out by Mr. Link to be able to add fees and continue milking money from his own and other parties. If you want to waste months and waste a lot of money instead of finalizing your divorce.. this is the lawyer for you. ...

I was a stay at home mom with an infant when my ex-husband filed for divorce. My first attorney which I hired with borrowed money dropped my case after canceling my hearing for attorney's fees and financial relief( without my consent). At this time I was in the midst of a highly contentious divorce!... I called Chris's office & spoke with Mel,and she understood everything, but I was short $500 for the retainer (still on borrowed money) Then things got worse after I hired my 2nd attorney. Which I had doubts about but, had a hearing scheduled and was pressured for time/money. She did nothing, just talked the talk she didn't even so much get me the financial hearing I pleaded with her to get and after at least 7 months of desperation and being in a highly contentious divorce,) things spun even more out of control with her as my attorney. My ex-husband now on lawyer 3! I called Chris's office again, desperate, scared and distrustful of attorneys! I made the appointment for the consultation and went in there with my family by my side, we were all at our wits end to say the least.by now I sold my jewelry, personal belongings and owed everyone in my family money, my credit was ruined, car was voluntarily surrendered etc... I went through my convoluted divorce, and I knew talking to him he would be able to get me out of the mess I was in. I left his office with with a weight off my shoulders, I had also given all my documents, thousands of papers! First thing he did on my case was set up the hearing I had waited a year for, they went through everything with a fine tooth comb, and we had a successful hearing! Finally I had some justice my child and myself! He got everything squared away. So much so in fact My ex-husband fired his 3rd attorney immediately after that hearing and was on lawyer #4. I can't say enough good things about Chris and his highly competent team. I could only wish I found him first, if anyone says he's expensive not hiring him could cost you more, and not just financially. I will always recommend him, because I learned the hard way, the difference between a phenomenal lawyer and the the ones who just want blood money.