We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Sharon Fast Gustafson is a solo practitioner in Arlington, Virginia. She received her J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center, cum laude, in 1991. After law school she worked for four years in the labor and employment law group at Jones, Day in Washington, D.C., where she also handled adoption matters pro bono.
Ms. Gustafson now practices in Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia, dividing her time between employment matters and adoption matters. She is a member of the National Employment Lawyers Association (NELA) and of the American Academy of Adoption Attorneys (AAAA).
4
Practice Areas
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: District of Columbia
Acquired: 1992
No misconduct found
State: Maryland
Acquired: 1992
No misconduct found
State: Virginia
Acquired: 1991
No misconduct found
Sharon Fast Gustafson Attorney At Law PLC, 6047 N. 25th Street, Arlington, VA, 22207
Not Yet Reviewed
"I am consistently impressed by the level of expertise and dedication shown on Avvo. The detailed and thoughtful advice provided demonstrates a deep understanding of the law and a genuine commitment to helping others. The time and effort spent answering questions and offering guidance are truly commendable. I wholeheartedly endorse this attorney for their exceptional contributions to the Avvo community."
Employment and labor lawyer
2016
Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association, Attorney of the Year
1996 - Present
Owner, Sharon Fast Gustafson Attorney At Law
1990 - 1995
Associate, Jones Day Reavis & Pogue
2016 - Present
Federal Bar AssociationMember
1996 - Present
Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers AssociationMember
1995 - Present
National Employment Lawyers AssociationMember
1991 - Present
Federalist SocietyMember
1997 - 2014
American Academy of Adoption AttorneysFellow
U.S. Supreme Court held that Ms. Young had set out prima facie case of discrmination and she could prove discrimination by showing that UPS’s policies impose a burden on pregnant employees and that its reasons give rise to an inference of discrimination.
1991
J.D.
2016
Proving a Pregnancy Discrimination Case after Young v. UPS
2016
The McDonnell Douglas Test as Applied to Pregnancy Discrimination
2015
Employment Law Year in Review
2015
Special Delivery: Pregnancy Discrimination and Young v. UPS
2015
Pregnancy Discrimination and Accommodations after the Supreme Court's Ruling in Young v. UPS
2011
Adoption Law: Start to Finish
2005
Overview of ERISA and common Employee ERISA claims
2004
Good Employment Practice
2000
Progressive Discipline and Termination
1999
ERISA: Notice requirements, breach of fiduciary duties, and interference with protected rights"
English