Francelina Maria Perdomo-Klukosky

Francelina Maria Perdomo-Klukosky

also known as Francelina M. Perdomo

3.4
Rating: 7.5

Licensed for 21 years

Corporate and incorporation Lawyer at New York, NY
Practice Areas: Corporate & Incorporation, Entertainment, Intellectual Property ... +14 more

17 State Street, Suite 4000, New York, NY

About Francelina

Biography

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 21 years

State: New York

Acquired: 2005

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

Chinta, Perdomo, Berks & Frantangelo, LLP

17 State Street, Suite 4000, New York, NY, 10007

Gallet Dreyer & Berkey, LLP

845 Third Avenue, 5th Floor, New York, NY, 10022-6601

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Francelina Maria Perdomo-Klukosky's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.4 /5.0

9 Client Reviews

Showing 6 - 9 of 9 reviews

Posted by Kenji | March 04, 2019 | Hired Attorney

Beware of retaining Fran as your lawyer

I retained Fran as my attorney because I was a victim of fraud and had lost $60k in a ponzi scheme. Fran had pursued a TRO to obtain some sort of restraining order on the culprit's accounts, which sounds great, but not so much when her own private investigator reported that the culprit had no assets.... She is like an in-app purchase where every $5000 she would ask for more to move on to the next step of the legal process. I have emails begging, demanding, cajoling her to explain the legal process, to be clear about what our objectives are and what she was trying to achieve for me, only to find out from a second opinion that it's near impossible to get any money back from a dead beat. I spent over $20k on her and never once did she mention anything about getting any sort of judgment which is what I pushed for thanks to again, a second opinion. She became very defensive and unprofessional, especially when she realized I had another lawyer providing more practical and less expensive solutions. I am still to this day unsure whether she was deliberately being unclear or purposefully confusing about the legal process. What made things worse is she became condescending with the way she treated me. Fran claims she is a partner, but neither her communication skills, her legal advice, nor her treatment of a client justifies her "partner rate" of $300/hr. She can counter all she wants with technicalities on this review like she did arguing with me, her client. But I will warn you, you will spend money and not know what it is your trying to achieve and how much more you will need to spend to get there because she was so poor at communicating her strategy and condescending when you didnt get it. You will be throwing money in a black hole. I'm in finance and not law Fran so it would have been nice for you to at least act like a partner and make it seem like I'm getting my money's worth but you made me feel like I was conned all over again. Please feel free to refute this as you did trhoughout my case, but I'm happy to share my emails with anyone who is thinking about retaining her as I have plenty to back up my claims about her treatment and my consistent requests for clarification on what we were trying to achieve. You will be stunned by her responses.

Posted by Manish Jain | November 19, 2018 | Hired Attorney

Her firm simply duped me into shelling out USD 3500

I was engaged with Francelina M. Perdomo's firm as a client for over a month - she herself was my attorney. The firm solicited a retainer of USD 3500 from me in the case of appalling non-performance from a New York based publisher Apress, promising me legal action as well as damages. A month later, t...hey stated no damages were admissible. I asked the firm for a mere termination of publication. Madam Perdomo responded that was not possible/feasible and proffered her opinion that she considered me mentally deranged ! During the one month of engagement, neither she nor the associate assigned to work on my case asked me even a single question related to the case. The associate (Antoneta Tarpanova) never even emailed me or called me. I did, of my own volition, proffer high-quality documentation (~ 15 pages). At the end of the engagement, the firm sent me a bill of USD 4700 for reading those 15 pages (and doing nothing else whatever !)

Francelina Perdomo-Klukosky

Replied last November 19, 2018

I dispute this one-star rating and the legitimacy of this review. The only accurate fact is that Mr. Jain became a client of our firm. After carefully evaluating the facts of his case and reviewing substantial documentation, we concluded his case had little merit. We recommended to Mr. Jain that his best option was for us to write a letter to the other side in an attempt to help Mr. Jain sort his concerns amicably. I spoke with Mr. Jain several times over the phone and we discussed the strategy. Notwithstanding my explanations via email and phone, upon Mr. Jain’s review of our draft letter, he immediately refused it and demanded my firm to threaten the opposing party with civil and criminal charges. We refused to honor Mr. Jain’s request on legal and ethical grounds. As a result, Mr. Jain became belligerent, terminated our engagement and his emails degenerated into absurd accusations of collusion with the opposing party to the point where Mr. Jain wrote an email stating he had filed a complaint against us with the FBI alleging absurd instances of fraud, national security concerns, and other nonsense. Any accusations that we did not ask questions, fully communicated with Mr. Jain or did not do our work are completely false. It is now clear that Mr. Jain hired our firm solely for purposes of legitimizing his claims. Furthermore, the billing accusations in this review are not accurate - there was no follow up invoice as alleged. Kindly disregard this review.

Posted by Orietta Blanco | October 13, 2016 | Hired Attorney

Excellent lawyer, very pragmatic, knowledgeable and client orientated

Our firm has worked closely with Francelina for many years. She is responsive and creative when providing legal advice. What we like most about her is her proactive, efficient and cost-effective approach. She is very honest about chances of success and at the same time creative in finding alternative... solutions to each matter she handles. She is very knowledgeable and passionate in her areas of practice, which is an excellent combination for delivering the best legal services one could ask for.

Posted by Desiree Russo | September 29, 2016 | Hired Attorney

Reliable

Francelina is great at her job! As soon as I had my first conversation with her I felt at ease and confident that she was on my side and she knew what she was doing. She's always available to talk and answered every question I had with extreme patience since I don't really understand all the lawyer m...umbo-jumbo. She's fully bilingual so when I needed help with a case for my mom she was able to talk to her directly and explain what was going on. Super happy with the work and service she provided.

See All Client Reviews

Francelina Maria Perdomo-Klukosky's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Francelina
Antoaneta Velitchkova Tarpanova headshot
Antoaneta Tarpanova

Intellectual property lawyer | Jan 17

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer. I have worked with Fran on a wide variety of legal issues. Her depth and breadth of experience, her seasoned professional judgment and her vivid personality make her an exceptional attorney."

Andrew H Berks headshot
Andrew Berks

Business lawyer | Oct 19

Relationship: Co-worker

"I have worked with Fran in a number of contexts, and she is an excellent lawyer. She brings tremendous insight and skill to her clients, and is highly responsive to her clients' needs. Highly recommended."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.5 (Very Good)

Honors

N/A

Client Champion Award, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1900 - Present

Managing Partner, Perdomo Law

1900 - Present

Partner, Gallet Dreyer & Berkey, LLP

2016 - 2016

Attorney, Cittone & Chinta, LLP

Associations

2015 - Present

International Trademark Association

Member

2014 - Present

American Bar Association- Intellectual Property Section

Member

2014 - Present

Asociacion Interamericana de la Propiedad Industrial

Member

2010 - Present

New York Women in Film and Television

Member

2005 - Present

New York County Lawyers' Association

Member

Women in Music

Member

Education

2000

Cornell Law School

LL.M - Master of Laws

2000

Universite de Paris I, Pantheon Sorbonne

1999

Universidad Iberoamericana

JD - Juris Doctor

Languages

English

Spanish

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution