Free Consultation
$0 first 30 minutes
also known as Jim Wing
In 1989, I left a partnership in a medium-size firm to establish this firm, where one attorney is responsible for a matter from start to finish. Clients receive personal attention from me and my assistant. Having worked at a medium-size firm, I believe this provides superior service. This law firm utilizes up-to-date technologies in the service of our clients.
Lawyers who prepare with the expectation that the case will settle put their clients at a disadvantage. Complete preparation assures the best presentation of the evidence at trial and increases the likelihood that the opposition will agree to a favorable settlement to avoid trial.
It has become the standard of our practice to work hard and always be prepared.
18
Practice Areas
44 years
44 years
44 years
44 years
Free Consultation
$0 first 30 minutes
5 %
Sometimes
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Connecticut
Acquired: 1982
Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2025
619 Hopmeadow St, #2, Simsbury, CT, 06070
28 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 5 of 8 reviews | Communication Style
Posted by Heather | April 01, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Child Custody
Do not recommend
I went from having emergency custody of my children to have supervised visitation because Attorney Wing was falling asleep in his chair continuously going in and out of the room Family Relations placed me in. When hiring a new lawyer they simply said "well why didn't you go and wait in the court room...
Posted by anonymous | February 19, 2021 | Hired Attorney | Divorce & Separation
Heartless And Absent
Horrible. Hired this man's "firm" to represent me in a simple divorce. His retainer was more than most and I had to borrow money from my grandmother who has cancer, but we paid gladly to have his experience on my side. Boy was I wrong. He doesn't return emails. His paralegal is rude and condesce...
Posted by Joe | November 16, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Child Custody
Custody Modification
In Nov 2011, my ex-wife and I were divorced of which we had a baby together. The last 5 years involved petty behaviors, police involvement, an attempt to give up custody on two occasions and ultimately two false allegation claims of abuse. I will focus on the most recent incident of abuse allegations...
Posted by anonymous | July 10, 2015 | Divorce & Separation
JAMES WING IS A NIGHTMARE
In 7 weeks James Wing went through 10,000 of my divorce retainer and accomplished absolutely nothing. His communication skills are pitiful, does not return phone calls to his office("staffed" by one part time uninformed assistant), his cell phone does not accept messages. He charges fifteen cents for...
It is an unfortunate consequence of a large and long standing practice that sometimes we are chosen by and accept a client with whom we are not compatible. Happily, it is rare that one of our clients becomes as dissatisfied as the client who wrote this and therefore it was easy to deduce who it was. A divorce case can only be concluded three ways. The case can be withdrawn, the parties can reach an agreement and report their settlement to the court and the parties can try their case and have the court decide the outcome. In this case, we were hired to replace the attorney originally hired to handle the divorce with the expectation that the case was going to be tried and decided by the judge. I stepped in and participated in a Special Masters’ Pretrial days after being engaged, so as not to delay the matter from promptly reaching trial. I do not accept that my level of preparation was substandard. I recommended during the intake interview that a deposition be conducted to obtain testimony and commit the adverse party to a single story so there would be no surprises at trial and to demonstrate that litigation is an unfriendly and uncomfortable process. However, the client reversed the authorization for the deposition. This, in my opinion, stifled the best strategy available to promote settlement as an alternative to trial. During the 3 months we represented this individual, we frequently received more than 5 contacts per day by telephone or email, sometimes substantially more. We clearly communicated that all contacts are billable events and, as such, consume retainers. We urged the client, in our engagement agreement and subsequent communications to be careful about the expense of too frequent contacts for issues of minor or no importance. These warnings were not heeded. Still, emails received must be read and messages left must be listened to. We have a clause in our client/attorney engagement agreement that provides that we may charge at 1.5 times our hourly rate for services provided outside business hours and on weekends. This individual’s communications seemed to intensify at those times, especially on weekends. We advised that if the intrusion on our private time for non-emergency communication continued, we would charge at the increased rate, but the contacts did not stop. Regarding returning communications, there are several points. First, we try to respond no later than within 24 hours. Contacts are triaged and important contacts are returned first. On any given day, there might be a trial being presented for another client whose matter had been in preparation for months. These are intensely important to us and sometimes we are slower responding. Other reasons for less than immediate responses are weekends away with family and when I am ill. I know most clients accept that. This former client also says that I am available for lengthy discussions, but not about the client’s case. I never reveal information about other or former clients, but I do use examples from other cases, both ones I have researched and ones I have been involved in, that illustrate ideas I am explaining. I think the examples are useful to the client in reaching an understanding of the law and possible outcomes. These discussions are, therefore, always in the context of the client’s matter. In the particular case complained of, settlement could not be reached because the opposing party did not change position during my representation, despite an improved offer from our side. There was nothing more to be done other than to prepare for trial and wait for the assigned date. As trial approached, the client was expressing anger and personally attacking my assistant and me and finally engaged another attorney who filed an appearance in lieu of mine. Throughout the difficult representation we strove to be patient and respectful.
Posted by Brenda | August 24, 2014 | Criminal Defense
the wing of justice
I hired attorney James Wing Jr. for my son's case , ( a criminal case) and my family and I are so happy with the out come of the case. He was facing some major felony charges. Jim always kept us informed and was ready with plan "B or C " just in case. Honesty and trustworthy and knowledgeable are de...
"I endorse Atty Wing. I've worked with Jim on several occasions. He's an excellent lawyer, who clearly puts the client first. Though I endorse Jim in "Education", if the Avvo drop-down menu allowed, I'd equally endorse him in areas involving Family Law, and Juvenile Matters. I found that the best measure of Jim's ability is when a client that I referred to him calls me to thank me for directing them to Atty. Wing."
"I endorse this lawyer. I worked with Jim as local counsel for two of his Connecticut clients who were injured when their vehicle was struck by a tractor trailer in Virginia. Jim proved to be a very quick study in the area of Virginia law and procedure. The case was scheduled for binding arbitration and Jim very ably handled the matter. He produced an excellent outcome for his clients while demonstrating an admirable personal concern for them. I have practiced law for more than 25 years and recognize good lawyering when I see it. Jim is a very good lawyer and I highly recommend him."
"Jim was co-counsel on a delicate case involving a teen age student at a private school in Massachusetts. He was a pleasure to work with, very thoughtful, considerate, creative, and practical. He is the best type of lawyer to work passionately on a client's behalf with a high level of expertise."
"I have known Jim in the greater Hartford legal community for several years. Many times I have sought his judgment and advice with family, juvenile and school education related issues. He has distinguished himself with protecting the rights of parents and children in the ever-changing fields of school discipline and equal opportunity to public education for all children, regardless of their needs. I highly recommend his expertise, particularly in these complex areas of the law."
"I endorse this lawyer's work. Jim is extremely bright, experienced and dedicated to his clients' goals. I have referred many people to Jim and will continue to do so in the future."
Criminal defense lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
DUI and DWI lawyer
Insurance lawyer
Personal injury lawyer
Personal injury lawyer
Litigation lawyer
Employment and labor lawyer
This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2025.
Court Ordered Reprimand issued in CT, 2025
updated on 02/11/2026A court reprimand is an order from the Superior Court after it has found that an attorney has engaged in ethical misconduct. If an attorney receives more than 3 reprimands in 5 years, a presentment must be filed against the attorney so the Superior Court can decide if more serious discipline should be ordered.
2019
Super Lawyer 2019-2020, New England Super Lawyer Magazine
2018
Super Lawyer 2018-2019, New England Super Lawyer Magazine
2017
Super Lawyer 2017-2018, New England Super Lawyer Magazine
2016
Super Lawyer 2016-2017, New England Super Lawyer Magazine
2015
Super Lawyer 2015-2016, New England Super Lawyer Magazine
2014
Super Lawyer 2014-2015, New England Super Lawyers Magazine
2013
Super Lawyer 2013-2014, New England Super Lawyers Magazine
2012
Super Lawyer 2012-2013, New England Super Lawyers Magazine
2011
Super Lawyer 2011-2012, New England Super Lawyers Magazine
2010
Top Lawyers, Hartford Magazine
2007
named James W. Cooper Fellow, Connecticut Bar Foundation
1998 - 2000
Adjunct Professor, University of Hartford/Hartford College for Women
1982 - Present
Connecticut Bar AssociationMember
1982 - Present
American Bar AssociationMember
1982 - Present
Hartford County Bar AssociationMember
Family Special Master
2006 - 2008
Hartford County Bar FoundationPresident
1999 - 2003
Hartford County Bar AssociationDirector
1999 - 2010
Harford County Bar FoundationDirector
Case dismissed.
Suspended sentence and probation
Education Law - Due Process Hearing
1982
JD - Juris Doctor
1979
BA - Bachelor of Arts
2005
"Bullies and Their Victims"
2004
School Discipline and the Special Needs Child
2003
School Discipline and the Special Needs Child
N/A
The New Connecticut Child Support Guidelines
2010
Legal Answers
Legal Guides
Old child support order, how to collect a past balance?
20 Sep 2021
What happens if my total weekly expenses and liabilities are slightly higher than my income?
10 Sep 2021
Is there anything I can do to get my son out of a suspension from middle school based on hearsay and child retaliation?
13 Sep 2021