Austin Clifford Tzeng

Mr. Tzeng was very knowledgeable not only about handling my case but was also very familiar with the people working in the court. He had worked with all the judges and knew what to expect from them. Representing me in a harassment prevention case, he knew exactly what to say and what information he ...needed from me to get the best possible outcome. He was honest about setting expectations and overall had a very pleasant down to earth manner. I felt like he could relate to my situation which eased my mind and took off a lot of stress. I would definitely recommend Mr. Tzeng who specializes in criminal defense.

i got Austin as a lawyer for a particular case I caught... he decided to take on my 3 other cases and I now only have the original case still going on all the other stuff got dismissed. he really knows his stuff and he put a great amount of effort into the case. it seems like he really cares and love...s his job.

my fiance and i are currently using austin as my fiances lawyer and i have absolutely no complaints about this man. he is an amazing lawyer and an understanding individual. he is not afraid to go against the judicial system when he feels the system is wrong and he will go above and beyond. there has ...been plenty of times i have called his office and if he wasnt in i would still get a speedy call back from him. when we were unable to make it to court due to a snowstorm, he didnt force us to go, he went in to the courts and asked for another date, when i was sick at one of the court dates and gave him a slight attitude he didnt hold it against me, he knows his stuff and has showed us plenty of paperwork regarding my fiances case. this man is intelligent and trustworthy and i would give him 10 stars if i was allowed to.

Austin Tzeng represented me in a criminal defense matter in the Cambridge District Court. During his representation, I underwent an evaluation by the Court's Clinical Psychologist, who found that I was not competent to stand trial, and who recommended further evaluation to determine competency. Thi...s evaluation and report was suppressed by the judge, who ordered the case to trial. Austin Tzeng was aware of the interview, evaluation, report, and published recommendation that a trial should NOT be held, pending resolution of the question of doubt concerning my so-called competence. Attorney Tzeng either made no effort to obtain the published and completed report during the period of his connection with the case; nor did he provide continuity and sufficient background concerning this issue to successor counsel. As a result of the wrongfulness of the trial and its constitutional defects, Trial Judge made a finding of ineffective assistance of counsel and has remanded the case back to the Court for re-trial.