7.9
Very Good
Client Ratings
Not yet reviewed
Overview
Practice Areas
|
-
67% Criminal Defense
-
33% Litigation
|
Contact Information
|
|
References
Client Reviews
|
How would you rate this lawyer?
If you're a current or former client, share your thoughts (anonymously, if you prefer). Would you recommend this lawyer to other clients?
Review this lawyer
|
Endorsements
|
Joshua Schaer is a walking encyclopedia of knowledge about DUI and criminal defense. He has a tireless focus on the rights of clients in our firm....
more
Endorsement from lawyer:
James Egan
, Seattle (WA), 3 months ago
Josh is tireless, tenacious, and tough in the courtroom. He's also very personable, listens to and cares deeply about his clients. Whether a case...
more
Endorsement from lawyer:
Jon Zimmerman
, Seattle (WA), 3 months ago
View all 6 endorsements
|
Résumé
Licenses
|
-
8 years
since Joshua Saul Schaer was first licensed to practice law in WA.
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
Work Experience
|
| Position |
Duration |
| Attorney at Law Offices of James Egan |
2007–present
|
| Council Member at City of Issaquah |
2008–present
|
| Attorney at Stein, Lotzkar and Starr PS |
2004–2007
|
| Public Defender at Northwest Defenders Association |
2001–2004
|
| Intern at Nintendo of America |
1999–1999
|
See all 5 job entries
Hide additional positions
|
Education
|
| School |
Major |
Degree |
Graduated |
| University of Washington School of Law |
Law |
J.D., concentrations in Health Care and IP |
2001 |
| University of Washington -Seattle |
Political Science |
B.A., with Honors |
1998 |
|
Associations
|
| Position |
Association Name |
Duration |
| Judge Pro Tem |
King County District Court |
2007–present
|
|
Portfolio
Avvo Answers
|
Avvo Contribution:
Got speeding ticket when joining the highway from...
You should request a contested hearing within 15 days of the ticket date to protect your rights;... more
|
Cases
|
- Title:
- Seattle v. Holifield
- Practice Area:
- DUI / DWI
- Outcome:
- Pending cert. to WA Supreme Ct.
- Description:
-
The Court of Appeals held that suppression is not a remedy under CrRLJ 8.3(b) and that the government can take a writ to cure errors of law. Defense...
See all cases
|
|
