-
Sign in with:
- Sign in
- Register
- Are you a Lawyer?
Scott Allen Kramer
6.6
| Experience |
|
| Industry Recognition |
|
| Professional Conduct |
|
Former client? Write a review
Lawyers: Endorse this lawyer
Overview
Practice Areas |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
Fees and Payment Types |
Fees
Fixed (Sometimes)
Payment types
Cash, Check
|
||
Contact Information |
|
||
About MePhotos (0)Videos (0) |
I am a sole-practitioner and my office is located in Miami Township, Ohio. My practice is limited to consumer bankruptcy and I represent individual debtors in... more |
References
Client Reviews |
 “Business Owner”Posted by: a Chapter 13 client, about 1 month ago.
Client Review:
Scott Kramer was referred to me due the detail and complexity of my case. After interviewing several attorneys the choice to work with Mr. Kramer was...
more
Flag
“Great Service”Posted by: Gina and Jerry, about 1 month ago.
Client Review:
Scott and his Paralegal Sunshine were both very helpful throughout the whole bankruptcy process. Very knowledgeable and prompt. I would recommend...
more
Flag
|
|---|---|
Peer Endorsements |
 As a divorce lawyer, I often encounter bankruptcy issues. I trust and rely on Attorney Kramer for advice dealing with these issues. He is very... more Endorsement from lawyer: Brian Sommers , Dayton (OH), About 1 month ago |
Résumé
Portfolio
Contribution |
Contributor Level 1
|
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases |
Outcome: Objection to confirmation sustained in part, denied in part.
Outcome: Debtors prevailed. The absence of the automatic Stay did not relieve creditors of binding effect of debtors' Chapter 13 plan.
|