-
Sign in with:
- Sign in
- Register
- Are you a Lawyer?
8.6
| Experience |
|
| Industry Recognition |
|
| Professional Conduct |
|
Former client? Write a review
Lawyers: Endorse this lawyer
Overview
Practice Areas |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
Fees and Payment Types |
Fees
Free Consultation (60 minutes)
Payment types
Cash, Check, Credit Card
|
||
Contact Information |
|
References
Client Reviews |
 “Cindy Salvo is great!”Posted by: a Debt Collection client, 4 months ago.
Client Review:
I have used Ms. Salvo several times in the past to handle FDCPA/TCPA defenses for me and she always does a wonderful job. Cindy is dedicated to...
more
Flag
“An attentive and responsive attorney”Posted by: Brugu, over 1 year ago.
Client Review:
I have worked with Cindy on several FDCPA matters and her representation has been wonderful. She is attentative and responsive to her clients needs.
Flag
|
|---|---|
Peer Endorsements |
 I endorse this lawyer. Very helpful to other attorneys who share our message board. Endorsement from lawyer: Anthony Van Zwaren , Clifton (NJ), 11 months ago Attorney Salvo and I worked together on a matter. I found her to be an extremely capable attorney and counselor. She promptly spotted numerous legal... more Endorsement from lawyer: Susan Liammari , Osprey (FL), Over 1 year ago |
Résumé
License |
14 years since Cindy Debra Salvo was first licensed to practice law.
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work Experience |
|
||||||||||||
Education |
|
||||||||||||
Awards |
|
||||||||||||
Associations |
|
Portfolio
Contribution |
Contributor Level 4
|
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases |
Outcome: Plaintiffs' case was dismissed. Title to the land remained with my client.
Outcome: Court held that my client had not infringed on Plaintiff's trademark, and it was allowed to keep the store's name. Plaintiff's case was dismissed.
Outcome: The Third Circuit agreed with the district court that Marshak and the others were properly held in conttempt for trademark infringement.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Publications |
|
Related Lawyer Searches
- Essex County Commercial lawyers
- Essex County Litigation lawyers
- Fairfield Commercial lawyers
- Fairfield Litigation lawyers
- New Jersey Commercial lawyers
- New Jersey Litigation lawyers
- New York Commercial lawyers
- New York Litigation lawyers
- Tarrytown Commercial lawyers
- Tarrytown Litigation lawyers
- Westchester County Commercial lawyers
- Westchester County Litigation lawyers