Zachary Kowalski

I would recommend Zack to a point. Very educated within the law. That being said, his written orders (judges will put the task of writing the orders to the lawyers) could be more specific. With vaguely written orders it only leads to more frustration when you are dealing with an uncompromising second... party. After spending thousands on a lawyer, you would hope for precise orders that limits nonsense from the other party. I think that point speaks to my other concern. Again, Zack knows the law. He even corrected the judge in a respectful way. However, his understanding of the people element needs refining --- I'm sure he will improve on this as I honestly feel he wants to do well for his client. But there were elements of my case that were never brought up that would put my ex-partner in a poor light. Instead, Zack presented a case that made the other party and myself look on equal terms. So after suffering assault on top of assault from the other party, I then had to suffer through a weak presentation of the facts. Zack can be hot or cold. In one of the false filings from the other party, he crushed it. Then during the custody hearing it was as if his mind was elsewhere or he had a dip in blood sugar or something. Something was off. He was a father to newborn at the time, so maybe it was a late night. I don't know, but it had ramifications affecting my life deeply.