No Photo

Michael David Bruckman

also known as Michael Bruckman, Mike Bruckman

3.2
Rating: 8.6

Licensed for 31 years

Bankruptcy and debt Lawyer Practice Areas: Bankruptcy & Debt, Foreclosure, Debt Settlement, Trusts

About Michael

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 30 years

State: New York

Acquired: 1996

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Licensed in Florida for 30 years

State: Florida

Acquired: 1996

Inactive

No misconduct found

Licensed in New Jersey for 31 years

State: New Jersey

Acquired: 1995

Resigned Without Prejudice

No misconduct found

Location

No contact information is available for this lawyer

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Michael David Bruckman's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.2 /5.0

9 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (9) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 5 of 9 reviews

Posted by anonymous | October 03, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

Would highly recommend...

My former husband and I filed chapter 13 Bancruptcy and Mr. Bruckman represented us. We never had a negative experience with him . We paid the trustee every month and never had any major issues. Unfortunately my husband and I divorced before we our bankruptcy was discharged and this left me in a ver...y bad financial state. The marital home was in my exhusband's name and I was struggling to keep it. Mr. Bruckman took me on as a client and has been nothing but wonderful in helping me through this traumatic ordeal! I am extremely grateful to him for his perseverance in helping me to hang on to what I am working so hard to keep! I have found that being open and honest with him , no matter how much pride you have to swallow is the only way he can fully represent you in the way you deserve .

Posted by Steve | October 03, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Bankruptcy & Debt

Great Service / Does what he says!

Mr. Bruckman provided me with excellent service. I visited 3 lawyers in Gainesville and I finally chose Mr. Bruckman and he stated that I will be fine and that the bankruptcy will be completed and I will not loose anything. I filed $1,300,000 in debt in July 2012 and by Nov 2012 it was completed and ...not on penny in costs and no one item of person items were lost. I expected to lose everything on this issue and Mr. Bruckman assured me based on my individual issues that I will be fine and the final outcome was exactly what he stated it would be. No other lawyer gave me this confidence or assurance and Mr. Bruckman surely delivered on what he said he would. I am very glad I met with Mr. Bruckman and recommend him to everyone in the area. I truly hope I never have to file again but if I do I will absolutely use Mr. Bruckman's service and would recommend you do to.

Posted by anonymous | August 09, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Chapter 7 Bankruptcy

Disappointed,discusted

I went to Mr.Bruckman for information. He told me chapter 7 was the way to go for me. I retained him and at that point I was informed to stop paying my debtors. Before this time I was never late nor did I ever miss a payment. After 3-6 months of getting information gathered for chapter 7 I was told I... do not qualify. My credit is now ruined. Thank you Mr. Bruckman.

Michael Bruckman

Replied last August 09, 2016

I believe I may know who this client is. I'll be happy to summarize what happened. My initial consultation with the client involved a good review of her financial situation. At that time (late March) she indicated her gross income for the past six months had been under the median level of income for the state of Florida. Her information to me at that time was that she grossed "about $1500 every two weeks" from County employment, and that the other income coming into the household had "just started" and that the amounts were "much less" than the main job. At that time, I made the recommendation for chapter 7. I always tell my clients before I advise them that my advice is based on the facts in front of me. The client came back in April to pay an initial retainer, and I gave her the paperwork to fill out at that time, with a list of documentation to bring to us. She brought back the remaining balance with the required backup documentation in May. I reviewed that documentation at a third meeting, also in May , where I did notice the amounts of the deposits from the second job were slightly larger than I was led to believe, and was over a slightly longer time period. The "means test" (the test that determines eligibility to file) indicated the case was now an "above-median case" rather than below, as the initial interview showed. I then proceeded to enter all of the information it takes to analyze an "above the median" debtor. Just because my clients exceed the median level of income for the state does not mean chapter 7 is unavailable to them, it just means that more work is needed to get them the relief they deserve. Unfortunately, I did not create the test, Congress did in 2005, without very much participation of anyone in the bankruptcy system (debtor or creditor, actually), and the test is not "intuitive" - meaning that I cannot just look at numbers and tell right away the case is a problem - I actually have to enter the numbers into my software. Once i saw that her income from both jobs took her above the median, I made two recommendations. One, the easiest, was to start tithing. Congress allowed for people in this situation to actually "find religion" and start making charitable contributions, regardless of their current debt situation. It then acts as a deduction on the means test and allows them to qualify to file. I find this particular part of the statute ridiculous, but I will use whatever tools Congress decided to give me. Currently, in this jurisdiction it is IRRELEVANT that these contributions started 2 or 3 months before filing - because the statute mentions nothing about it. However, I generally recommend my clients make one more contribution after filing to show the belief in the cause was "validly held" (even though, that is not a requirement, either), and I stated the client should do at least 4 months worth of tithes, for a total of about $1700-$2000 . Might the client be able to "get away with" three months of contributions - yes - but I err on the side of caution. I also recommend my clients consider the purchase of a vehicle ( if they can afford one) because it also adds a deduction under the means test. You cannot just "buy a vehicle to qualify for bankruptcy" of course. There must be a specific, non-bankruptcy reason that must be documented before you undertake the purchase to avoid any problems with the case. As I recall, as usual for clients in this position, the preferential course of action is tithing or charitable contributions. The client seemed frustrated at the length of time and further cost it would take to get bankruptcy relief, and left. Charitable contributions of approximately 5-10% of the monthly income for 4-5 months (possibly less) would result in chapter 7 relief. The client elected not to do so. I do not believe I provided inadequate service - I still believe ch.7 is possible and the best course of action for the case.

Posted by anonymous | August 05, 2016 | Chapter 7 Bankruptcy

Extreme lack of communication

I was originally told I did not "qualify" for Chap 7 , so he filed Chap 13, during which time I made payments to a trustee. Almost a year later, he informed me that NOW I qualified for Chap 7, even though none of my circumstances had changed. When I asked him about the money I had paid the trustee, h...e said it would come back to him. Oh, well..... A year after my final discharge, I found, after applying for a car loan, that a judgment entered before my discharge had never been removed , or shown as satisfied,in court records. I made an appt with him and when he checked the judgment, he realized he had not followed thru and said he would do so at his own expense. That was almost 4 years ago...I have called since and was told my file was on his desk. It must have been there as something amusing because it still has not been resolved as far as I know. How professional is THAT?

Michael Bruckman

Replied last June 05, 2015

I believe this is the same negative review from Diane on which I have already commented below.

Posted by Kitty | November 18, 2015 | Foreclosure

Please do your own due diligence before retaining any lawyer!

I went very prepared for a consultation with Mr. Bruckman. I had planned on retaining him if I felt good about our interaction and his knowledge regarding mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures. I was extremely dissatisfied with both our interaction and his knowledge. I certainly did my due dilig...ence and knew my facts of current issues and trends. At the beginning of our session, I went over several significant facts and factors that I was not aware of before researching. I specifically asked him if he knew of each of these items and he said yes. It became apparent to me toward the end of our conversation that he was definitely not aware of many of these extremely important issues. I am so glad I knew what was going on with current lawsuits and assistance programs. If I had blindly walked into the situation, knowing nothing, I am afraid what may have happened if I retained him. At the end, I learned that he had another appointment 30 minutes after mine,,,and I was supposed to get a 40 minute consultation. I knew as his 4PM appointment walked in early, when I was standing there. On the way out I said, "well hopefully I will get approved on the Florida's Hardest Hit Program"....he said, "they just ran out of money"....my response back was "no, Mr. Bruckman, you are incorrect, in fact the program just received another 1 billion dollars a few months ago". This was the final straw and proved to me that he was NOT up on current cases and programs I had just done fresh research on. I was extremely disappointed with him altogether. Please do your own DD before retaining an attorney. Ask them questions about why you should hire them and let them tell you about their experience. Make sure their are as up to speed as you are. Choosing the right attorney means everything. I'm sure many of them think you don't know as much as they do because that is why you are consulting with a professional lawyer. I learned the biggest lesson of my adult life and my eyes are now wide open. They are only human as are we. So, make sure you get a good referral from someone that has used a certain attorney. He had a high rating and that is why I went to him first.. Do not take ratings as the law. Make sure you know your facts, so you will KNOW if an attorney is right for you. In this case, a high rating meant nothing and was only based upon 1 past client rating. I am more disappoined by Mr. Bruckman than I am with my mortgage lender. Know your facts, as when you do, you will be able to make the right and informed decision for yourself. Only we can look out for ourselves.

Michael Bruckman

Replied last November 18, 2015

I remember this person relatively well. I never represented her. I offered a free consultation as I do for most of my clients in these situations. This part of her review seems correct: "At the beginning of our session, I went over several significant facts and factors that I was not aware of before researching. I specifically asked him if he knew of each of these items and he said yes." This potential client started to quote the law back to me, before I had the chance to analyze her situation and then apply the law to the facts. I never want any client who thinks they know the law better than me, so I politely, but tersely, answered her remaining questions, knowing that I did not want to represent her, ever. If she mistook this for ignorance, I apologize. I will have to be more direct with these types of potential clients in the future.

See All Client Reviews

Michael David Bruckman's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Michael
Sergio Cabanas headshot
Sergio Cabanas

Unknown lawyer | Apr 19

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Mr. Bruckman has the highest ethical standards and is tenacious and fearless. He will provide excellent representation for his clients."

Mark Joseph Fraser headshot
Mark Fraser

Bankruptcy and debt lawyer | Sep 21

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I have known Mr. Bruckman for over 10 years and think that he is the most knowledgeable and hardest working bankruptcy attorney in the area."

Gregory Thomas Buckley headshot
Gregory Buckley

Bankruptcy and debt lawyer | Oct 02

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer's work."

View All Endorsements
Mark Joseph Fraser headshot
Mark Fraser

Litigation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.6 (Excellent)

Honors

2007

service award, Temple Shir Shalom

1993

student scholarship award, Court Review Magazine

Work Experience

1999 - Present

Managing Partner, Michael D. Bruckman, PA

1998 - 1999

Partner, Frier, Frier, & Bruckman, PA

1996 - 1998

Associate, Bond & Botes, PA

1994 - 1996

Judicial Law Clerk, Northern District of Florida Bankruptcy Court

Associations

2007 - 2008

Federal Bar Association (Gainesville chapter)

Board Member

2005 - 2007

Temple Shir Shalom

Board Member

2004 - 2005

Northern District of Florida Bankruptcy Bar Association

President

2003 - 2008

Northern District of Florida Bankruptcy Bar Association

Board Member

Sample of Legal Cases

BBVA Compass v. Chatman

Settlement - terms cannot be disclosed

See More Legal Cases

Education

1994

St. John's University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1991

Binghamton University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2015

Money Smart Week: Alachua County Library Your Credit and How to Repair it

2007

North. Dist. of Fla. Bankruptcy Bar Assoc. Seminar

Case Law Update - Bankruptcy

1998

North. Dist. of Fla. Bankruptcy Bar Assoc. Seminar

Panel Discussion on Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

1997

1997 North. Dist. of Fla. Bankruptcy Bar Assoc. Seminar

Panel Discussion on Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

Publications

1998

The Gainesville Sun The Stigma Attached To Bankruptcy is Alive and Well

1994

American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review Note: The Thickening Fog of "Substantial Abuse": Can 707(a) Help Clear the Air?

1993

Court Review The Bottom of the Ninth, or is it Bottomless? Reconceiving the Ninth Amendment for a Modern World

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution