Philip Matthew deMaine

Philip Matthew deMaine

5.0
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 27 years

Medical malpractice Lawyer at Tacoma, WA
Practice Areas: Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury, Licensing

2115 N 30th St Ste 101, Tacoma, WA

About Philip

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 27 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1998

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Oregon for 19 years

State: Oregon

Acquired: 2006

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Philip Matthew deMaine

2115 N 30th St Ste 101, Tacoma, WA, 98403-3396

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Philip Matthew deMaine's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

15 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (15) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 5 of 15 reviews

Posted by Surgeon | October 08, 2019 | Hired Attorney | Medical Malpractice

Simply the BEST!!!!

Mr. deMaine is absolutely fantastic! He’s one of the best Med malpractice attorneys out there. He is never outworked, he listens and takes the time to understand his clients often complex circumstances. He follows through and retains the very best experts to help prepare and see his Physician and ...surgeon clients through the most difficult non-patient care related events we face in our careers. Phil cares a tremendous amount about what he does, he’s passionate, persistent, and leaves nothing left to chance while defending his clients. Thank you for all you do!

Posted by Randy | August 01, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Medical Malpractice

If you are unfortunate enough to require malpractice representation...

When I retired in 2014 for health reasons, I had an implant patient with chronic maxillary sinusitis, but unrated to her implants. She found an attorney that thought he could make this my problem and this is when I met Mr. deMaine, Through four years (4 years is not unusual, in fact it takes over a ...year to schedule the trial), Mr. deMaine was part intellectual, part psychologist--being sued is traumatic emotionally and inter-personally for your entire family. Mr. deMaine took every opportunity to make sure I was healthy and not abused by the legal process. Mr. deMaine worked tirelessly to get me the best--even famous--expert witness testimony which supported my professional decisions and treatments. Mr. deMaine explained the 'system' to me in great detail and took much time to prepare me for deposition and trial. At no time did Mr. deMaine give me false hope or hyperbole, but reasonable expectations. What I appreciated most about Mr. deMaine, was his explanation that being sued in court by a jury of my peers, has nothing to do with facts and my reliance on being 'right,' has nothing to do with the court process and 'guilt' is more of a subjective process. Two months before my scheduled trial, Mr. deMaine visited the enemy's expert specialist across state and through his most professional preparation, basically demonstrated every point this expert had put to paper, was wrong. The case was dismissed and no trial was required. Needless to say, Mr. deMaine is one of few hero's I have met in my life.

Posted by Rrooney | April 29, 2015 | Lawsuits & Disputes

Tenacious litigator

Phil was extraordinary. Details matter in litigation and he absolutely understands that. His preparation before trial was impressive. There was no stone unturned. Every deposition and piece of evidence was assessed and reassessed to find any potential inconsistency to strengthen our case. This... is the type of preparation that finds success in all endeavors and particularly in litigation. In the courtroom, in large part due to his preparation and thorough understanding of the case at hand, he was completely at ease and unflappable. This was not lost on the judge, jury or plaintiff's attorneys. Because he had such a command of the facts and the issues he immediately established himself as the most credible of the attorneys involved. His credibility enabled him to be the more persuasive litigator and he easily controlled the outcome of the case. Defense verdict in 36 minutes.

Posted by anonymous | March 06, 2013 | Lawsuits & Disputes

Excellent, successful service performed pleasantly

Phil was always pleasant, informed, capable and intelligent from pretrial preparation to the resolution of the trial. I always felt confident with my legal team with Phil in the lead. Phil helped make an otherwise unpleasant experience almost enjoyable. It certainly helps that the case settled in ...my favor.

Posted by Alan | January 02, 2013 | Litigation

Outstanding Malpractice Defense Attorney

Mr. deMaine did a fantastic job on a complex malpractice case. He was very helpful in all aspects of the trial and did a particularly good job preparing me for the deposition and cross examination. This was a difficult case to defend but the verdict was for all of the defendants.

See All Client Reviews

Philip Matthew deMaine's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Philip
Heather Z Bliss headshot
Heather Bliss

Unknown lawyer | May 09

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Philip is well respected in the legal community, a great advocate for his clients. I endorse this attorney."

James J Holland headshot
James Holland

Personal injury lawyer | Apr 14

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"Phil and I worked as opposing counsel on a contentious case. I found Phil to be a strong adversary who carefully and ethically fought for his client's rights. He also is willing and able to listen to reason and work a matter through to a mutually beneficial conclusion - a trait which serves his clients well. Phil has strong legal acumen and a good grasp of the factual and emotional issues involved in each case and presented at each trial. This ability allows Phil to see around corners and reach an early resolution based on an accurate assessment of the probable outcome range."

Michael S. Waddington headshot
Michael Waddington

Personal injury lawyer | May 26

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Philip. He is a highly skilled attorney that is well respected in the legal community."

Jane Elizabeth Clark headshot
Jane Clark

Medical malpractice lawyer | Dec 01

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I have known Phil for several years and he is an excellent attorney. He is a strong advocate for his clients and achieves great results for them while remaining professional and courteous with opposing counsel., It is a pleasure working with Phil and I would highly recommend him."

Kathryn Julia Herrmann headshot
Kathryn Herrmann

Medical malpractice lawyer | Mar 06

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"In 16 years of practice, Philip is the only lawyer who handed me, after a grueling 3 week dental malpractice trial, a resounding defense verdict! Ouch! But there was no shame in it; Phil is the most competent, hardworking, ethical, and knowledgeable attorney I've faced in the courtroom. He treats opposing counsel with respect and tries his case on the merits - no dirty tricks. Post trial, I referred several cases to him, all with outstanding results. I would encourage any doctor or dentist sued for malpractice to insist on Phil as legal counsel."

Brian Matthew King headshot
Brian King

Litigation lawyer | Aug 16

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Phil is an outstanding trial attorney. He is a zealous advocate for his clients and has an excellent grasp of the law and trial practice. Whenever I refer a client to Phil, I am confident knowing that he or she will receive exceptional and diligent representation."

View All Endorsements
Heather Z Bliss headshot
Heather Bliss

Divorce and separation lawyer

Kathryn Julia Herrmann headshot
Kathryn Herrmann

Personal injury lawyer

Brian Matthew King headshot
Brian King

Commercial real estate lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2019

Member, American Board of Trial Advocates

2019

Fellow, American College of Trial Lawyers

2019

Fellow, American College of Trial Lawyers

2012

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2011

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2010

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2008

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2004

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2003

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

Work Experience

2008 - Present

Partner, Johnson, Graffe, Keay, Moniz & Wick, LLP

1998 - 2007

Associate, Johnson, Graffe, Keay, Moniz & Wick, LLP

Associations

2020 - Present

Martindale Hubbell

AV Rating

2019 - Present

American Board of Trial Advocates

Member

2012 - Present

Washington State Society of Health Care Attorneys

2011 - Present

Defense Research Institute

Medical Liability and Health Care Law

2006 - Present

Oregon State Bar

Member

2006 - Present

Primerus

Member

2005 - Present

Defense Research Institute

Member

2000 - Present

Washington State Association for Justice

Member

2000 - Present

Washington Health Care Risk Management Society

Member

1999 - Present

Washington Defense Trial Lawyers

Member

1999 - Present

United States District Court for the Western District of Washington

Admitted to Practice

1998 - Present

Washington State Bar Association

Member

1998 - Present

Tacoma Pierce County Bar Association

Member

2008 - 2009

Washington State Healthcare Risk Management Society

Immediate Past President

2007 - 2008

Washington Health Care Risk Management Society

President

2006 - 2007

Washington Health Care Risk Management Society

President-Elect

2001 - 2003

American Inns of Court

Member

2000 - 2006

American Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Sarrett v. Zhou

defense verdict for client

Simpson v. Thorslund, 151 Wn. App. 276, 287, 211 P.3d 469 (2009).

Client prevailed at trial and on appeal.

Bolan v. Buck

Defense verdict for Mr. deMaine's client

Baker v. Nguyen

Defense verdict for Mr. deMaine's client

Barrios v. Valencia

Defense verdict for Mr. deMaine's client

Miller v. Wong

Defense verdict for Mr. deMaine's client

Kepler v. Kepler

Verdict for client in excess of $1.5 million

See More Legal Cases

Education

1998

Willamette University College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor- cum laude

1995

University of Washington

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2017

Washington Healthcare Risk Management Society Annual Meeting

Case Law Update

2017

Regional Meeting

Dental Malpractice and Licensing Matters

2016

Health Law Class

Medical Malpractice: A Practitioner's Perspective

2014

Radio Interview Medical Malpractice

2011

Annual Meeting

Dental Malpractice Claims

2008

King County Dental Association Educational Meeting

Employment Law

2007

WHCRMS Annual Conference

Legislative Update

2007

Annual Northwest Dental Convention

Employment Litigation

2006

WHCRMS Monthly Meeting

Trial Consultants: Privileged Information?

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution