No Photo

Clayton Ernest Longacre

3.1
Rating: 1.0

Licensed for 33 years

Litigation Lawyer at Port Orchard, WA
Practice Areas: Litigation, Civil Rights, Native Peoples Law ... +4 more

569 Division St Ste F, Port Orchard, WA

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2012
See Details

About Clayton

Biography

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 33 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1992

Disbarred

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2012

Location

Longacre Law Firm

569 Division St Ste F, Port Orchard, WA, 98366-4600

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Clayton Ernest Longacre's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.1 /5.0

19 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 5 of 5 reviews | Responsiveness

Posted by Shirley | May 17, 2011 | Criminal Defense

Clients Beware

I retained Mr. Lonacre for my grandaughter, on two felony charges, he is very unprofessional, and has no staff except his girl friend, which he using as a secetary. Does'nt keep you informed of what is happing, shows up to court late, or doesn't bother to show up, we paid his retainer of $5,000 for... each charge plus $3,000, for a grand total of $13,000, he calls only to demand more money. Has done nothing but write a brief which he told my grandaughter , that was another $5,000 , it had missed spelled words, the wrong date and was only two pages, I think he is the worst attorney I have ever had to deal with, he would text my grandaughter and Threaten her (if she didn't give him more money he would not appear in court, or he would with draw as her attorney, which in the end he did, with no refund of any of the money . They did drop one charge, but no thanks to him. We knew that would happen, due to illeagal search. Our experience with him was stressful and degrading. So all I have to say is client beware.

Posted by Colten | May 03, 2011 | Lawsuits & Disputes

Just cause

Basically took my money then ignored me for several months, didnt do hardly anything to help me. I had to hire another attorney(who quickly brought about results) to take a court date because i could not get ahold of longacre in any way,shape or form. After realizing they were going to ignore my case... completly i asked for me money back, they refused and threatedned to bill me even more.Also threatened me with 'infamatory statements' which is ridiculous becasue i have accurate documenaation and witnessed. Longacre has made yet another enemy.. Very unprofessional,BEWARE

Posted by Apolonio Garcia | March 18, 2011 | Criminal Defense

My full recommendation

My name is Apolonio Vega Garcis, on July 12, 12010 I was arrested and charged with 3 felonies and 1 misdemeanor. I was given a public defender and I professed my innocence but the public defender had neither the time nor inclination to believe or defend me properly. After 5 months I was offered a yea...r and a day in prison as plea from the prosecution, my PD urged me to accept to the offer. It became obvious that I was an innocent man and was going to be sent to prison. My family refused to accept that and started to search for a good lawyer to represent me and by word of mouth and extensive searching, Clayton Longacre was found. Clayton came to see me at 8:30 that night, he asked me what happened and listened to me without interruption for half an hour. He said he wished I had called him sooner and that he would ‘take care of me.’ For the first time in 6 months I had hope. Clayton investigated the arrest and interviewed everyone involved including the police, the witnesses, and the accuser. On Feb. 3 we went to jury trial, the prosecution was asking for a sentence of 5 years. Throughout the trial Clayton was able to point out time and time again the facts which proved my innocence. After only 3 hours of deliberation the jury returned with a Not Guilty verdict on all 4 charges. I did not get off by a technicality; Clayton proved that I was innocent. If I were sent to prison at 58 for 5 years I’m sure it would’ve ruined my life forever, Clayton Longacre saved my life. I have spoken with him several times since I got out, he really cares for the people he defends. I owe him a debt which I can’t adequately pay. If you need legal representation you cannot do better than Clayton Longacre. Clayton Longacre has outstanding ethics and is fully recommended.

Posted by Donna | February 18, 2011 | Criminal Defense

Very intelligent defense lawyer

Clayton Longacre represented my brother-in-law on 3 felony and 1 misdemeaner charges which included domestic violense.Mr Longacre not only charged a reasonable fee but when it was all said and done the verdict was not guilty on all four counts.He looked at the evidense and believed in his client .He ...pointed out things in court that most lawyers would have missed.Clayton was a little difficult to get a phone call from at times,but when the chips counted he communicated well.Prosecuters do not like going against Clayton , he knows what he is doing.I would definitley use him again.

Posted by anonymous | February 01, 2011 | Lawsuits & Disputes

Inexperienced and awful at communicating

Thankfully this was only the second time I have had to make use of a lawyer, but what an awful experience. Clayton never communicated with me, and instead forced me to constantly call him to be kept in the loop, but even then I found myself leaving messages for him only to never get a call back. He... is completely disinterested in his clients. In court, his performance was embarrassing at best.

See All Client Reviews

Clayton Ernest Longacre's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Clayton

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  1.0 (Extreme Caution)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2012.

Disbarment issued in WA, 2012

updated on 01/19/2013

This is the most serious penalty for a lawyer. If this attorney is currently practicing law, you should contact the the Washington State Bar to understand the reasons for this disbarment.

Reprimand issued in WA, 2010

updated on 03/30/2010

This means the attorney did something wrong, but the Bar did not suspend the lawyer. Typically in this case the lawyer's poor behavior is exposed to the public in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior.

Suspension issued in WA, 2005

updated on 03/30/2010

This means the attorney lost his or her license to practice law for a period of time. The attorney typically returns to practicing law when the suspension expires.

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2012
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution