C. Nelson Berry

C. Nelson Berry

also known as Charles Nelson Berry

5.0
Rating: 9.1

Licensed for 49 years

Family Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Family, Medical Malpractice, Wrongful Death, Personal Injury

1708 Bellevue Ave, Seattle, WA

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2013
See Details

About C.

Biography

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 46 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1979

Active

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2013

Licensed in District of Columbia for 47 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1978

Administratively Suspended - Non-Payment of Dues

Licensed in Colorado for 49 years

State: Colorado

Acquired: 1976

Withdrawn

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 1999

Location

Law Offices of C. Nelson Berry

1708 Bellevue Ave, Seattle, WA, 98122-2017

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

C. Nelson Berry's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

10 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (10) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Child Support

Posted by anonymous | December 05, 2010 | Child Support

Divorce and Child Custody

Mr. Berry has been my attorney since September 2001. He fought for me in my divorce settlement which concerned two young children and many financial issues including a family home. I had no idea what I was doing or what steps needed to be taken and Mr. Berry and his staff provided me with the guidanc...e all along the way and answered any and all concerns that I had immediately. My divorce was extremely complicated and although it was settled in December 2002, I have continuously had issues crop up with my ex-husband including sexual mis-conduct and child-support issues. Mr. Berry has fought for me and the welfare of my children successfully throughout this long process which is why he is still my attorney today. I have referred him to many friends and colleagues and will continue to do so. I highly recommend Mr. Berry and his team.

See All Client Reviews

C. Nelson Berry's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse C.
Terry Ann Zundel headshot
Terry Zundel

Family lawyer | Nov 20

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer. Neslon and I worked together for many years before I started my own practice. He is a highly knowlegeable and competent lawyer. He is passionate in representing his clients and will go the extra mile for them. When I can't take a client because of a conflict, I refer them to Nelson with confidence."

Mackenzie Wilker Mackins headshot
Mackenzie Mackins

Family lawyer | May 28

Relationship: Worked for lawyer

"I enthusiastically endorse this lawyer! He is a true professional and always willing to go the extra mile for his clients. I would gladly work with him again in the future."

Douglas Lee Burdette headshot
Douglas Burdette

Divorce and separation lawyer | Apr 29

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Nelson shared space with my firm for many years. If you are involved in a difficult, contentious and bitter divorce, Nelson will stand up and fight for you. He's an experienced and effective trial lawyer."

View All Endorsements
Terry Ann Zundel headshot
Terry Zundel

Family lawyer

Experience

Rating:  9.1 (Superb)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2013.

Reprimand issued in WA, 2013

updated on 06/30/2017

This means the attorney did something wrong, but the Bar did not suspend the lawyer. Typically in this case the lawyer's poor behavior is exposed to the public in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior.

C.’s comment:

“I represented a woman who throughout her dissolution believed her husband had been hiding assets. Shortly after final orders were entered, she provided me with evidence of an account which had not been disclosed at trial. I subpoenaed for information about the account and served opposing counsel. Opposing counsel threatened to bring a motion to quash which would have provided an appropriate forum to resolve this dispute. Instead, she filed a complaint with the WSBA.”

Reciprocal - Censure issued in CO, 1999

updated on 08/08/2017

This means that the attorney's misconduct in another state, or jurisdiction, also violated the rules for practicing law in Colorado.

C.’s comment:

“This censure was reciprocal nature and was for the same incident that occurred in 1998 in Washington, detailed below. I would be happy to discuss either incident, shown above and below, further.”

Reprimand issued in WA, 1998

updated on 06/30/2017

This means the attorney did something wrong, but the Bar did not suspend the lawyer. Typically in this case the lawyer's poor behavior is exposed to the public in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior.

C.’s comment:

“I represented a Minority Business Enterprise which had been exploited by HSW Construction and the Seattle School District during the refurbishing of Franklin High School. Two weeks into trial, the judge summarily dismissed portions of our claims outside the presence of the jury. I was so upset, I told the judge her rulings were “a travesty of justice”. I left the courtroom and let my co-counsel take over for the rest of the day. A week later, the judge found me in contempt for my comment.”

Honors

2020

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2019

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2018

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2017

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2010

Client Rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2000

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

Work Experience

1976 - 1978

Law Clerk to the Honorable William J. Holloway, U.S. Court Of Appeals, 10th Circuit

Associations

1980 - Present

Washington State Association for Justice

Eagle Member

1980 - Present

Washington State Trial Lawyers Association

Member

1979 - Present

Washington State Bar Association

Member

1978 - Present

Association of Trial Lawyers of America

1976 - Present

Oklahoma Trial Lawyers Association

Member

1976 - Present

American Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Dearden v. King County; Federal Way Medical Center; Kraft

Settlement for plaintiff, $1,750,000

Kirtley v. State, 49 Wash.App 894, 748 P.2d 1128 (1987)

Verdict for Plaintiff

Wellings v. Highline Community Hospital

Verdict for Plaintiffs; Policy limits of $7,000,000

Legal Malpractice

Jury verdict for Plaintiffs in excess of $1,200,000

See More Legal Cases

Education

1976

Georgetown University Law Center

JD - Juris Doctor

1973

University of Oklahoma

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2013
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution