Nicholas Phillip Scarpelli Jr

Nicholas Phillip Scarpelli Jr

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 8.0

Licensed for 51 years

Litigation Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Litigation

701 5th Ave Ste 3600, Seattle, WA

About Nicholas

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 51 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1974

Emeritus

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Nicholas Phillip Scarpelli Jr

701 5th Ave Ste 3600, Seattle, WA, 98104-7010

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Nicholas Phillip Scarpelli Jr's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Nicholas Phillip Scarpelli Jr's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Nicholas

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  8.0 (Excellent)

Honors

2014

Fellow, American College of Trial Lawyers

2013

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Magazine

2010

Top Lawyers, Seattle Metropolitan Magazine

2009

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Publication

2008

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Publication

2007

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Publication

2006

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Publication

2005

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Publication

2004

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Publication

2003

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Publication

2003

Top Lawyers, Seattle Magazine

N/A

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1979 - Present

Principal, Carney Badley Spellman, PS

1993 - 1996

President, Managing Shareholder, Carney Badley Smith & Spellman, PS

1984 - 1988

President, Managing Shareholder, Carney Badley Smith & Spellman, PS

1974 - 1979

Associate, Carney, Stephenson, Badley, Smith & Spellman

Associations

2002 - Present

American Board of Trial Advocates

Member

1974 - Present

King County Bar Association

Member

1974 - Present

Washington State Bar Association

Member

Association of Trial Lawyers of America

Member

Washington Defense Trial Lawyers

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Cummings v Budget Tank Removal & Environmental Services., LLC, 163 Wn. App. 379, 260 P. 3rd 220 (2011)

The decision was affirmed on appeal.

Higgins v. Intex Recreation Corp., 123 Wash.App. 821, 99 P. 3d 421, Prod. Liab. Rep. (CCH) P17, 188 (Wash.App.Div. 3)

Favorable outcome for client. Plaintiff awarded.

Barrett v. Lucky 7 Saloon, Inc., 152 Wash.2d 259, 96 P.3d 386 (Wash.App. Div. 3, Oct 26, 2004) (NO. 22140-7-lll)

Favorable outcome for client. Defense verdict.

Deming v. Estate of Deming, not rep. in P.3d, 105 Wash. App. 1032, 2001 WL 310341 (Wash. App. Div. 2, Mar 30, 2001)

Favorable outcome for client.

Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. Island County, 87 Wash.App. 552, 942 P.2d 1034 (Wash. App. Div 1, Aug 25, 1997)

Mackey v. American Fashion Institute Corp., 60 Wash.App. 426, 804 P.2d 642 (Wash.App. Div. 1, Jan 28, 1991)

Favorable outcome for client.

Uni-Com Northwest, Ltd. v. Argus Pub. Co., 47 Wash. App. 426, 787, 737 P.2d 304, 4 UCC Rep. Serv. 2d 317 (Wash.App. Div 1, 1987)

Favorable outcome for client.

Johnson v. Martin, 28 Wash. App. 774, 626 P.2d 525 (Wash. App. Div 1, Apr 6, 1981)

City of Tacoma v. O'Brien, 85 Wash. 2d 266, 534 P. 2d 114

See More Legal Cases

Education

1974

Gonzaga University School of Law

JD

1970

University of Notre Dame

BA

Speaking Engagements

2009

Litigation Boot Camp

Litigation Boot Camp, Cross Examination

2001

PEMO - In House Seminar

Claims Handling Law and Practices

1991

Annual Convention

Trial Practice and Techniques

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution