Christopher Thomas Wion

Christopher Thomas Wion

also known as Chris Wion, Christopher Wion

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 23 years

Litigation Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Litigation

315 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 1000, Seattle, WA

About Christopher

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Litigation 100%

25 years

100%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 23 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 2002

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Summit Law Group

315 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 1000, Seattle, WA, 98104-2682

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Christopher Thomas Wion's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Christopher Thomas Wion's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Christopher
Elizabeth Weden Perka headshot
Elizabeth Perka

Litigation lawyer | Apr 14

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I whole heartedly endorse Chris Wion. He is a fantastic litigator and great guy."

Mark A Wilner headshot
Mark Wilner

Litigation lawyer | Nov 10

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Chris is very smart, works hard, and has sound judgment. Most lawyers have only one of these traits. Some have two. Very few have all three. Chris is the total package."

Philip S. McCune headshot
Philip McCune

Litigation lawyer | Nov 09

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I’ve worked on the other side of Chris on several large litigation matters of national scope. Chris is a talented, intense and effective advocate and he has achieved significant respect and stature in our profession by exhibiting these qualities in a collegial and professional manner. I recommend Chris for conflicts work and I would hire him as my own attorney."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2026

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2025

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2021

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2020

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2019

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2018

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2017

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2017

Super Lawyer, Top 100, Washington Super Lawyers

2016

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2016

Super Lawyer, Top 100, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2016

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2015

SuperLawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2015

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2014

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2014

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2013

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2013

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2012

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2012

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2011

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2011

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2010

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2010

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2009

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2009

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2008

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2008

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2007

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2007

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2006

Rising Star, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2006

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

Work Experience

2016 - Present

Partner, Summit Law Group

2013 - 2016

Partner, Miller Nash Graham & Dunn, LLP

2005 - 2013

Partner, Calfo Harrigan Leyh & Eakes, LLP

2002 - 2005

Associate, Mundt MacGregor, LLP

2000 - 2000

Judicial Intern, U.S. District Court for Western District of Washington

1998 - 1998

Legal Intern, 1000 Friends of Washington

1998 - 2000

Law Clerk, Claims Resolution Tribunal for Dormant WWII-era Swiss Bank Accounts / Geneva, Switzerland

Associations

Seattle IP Inn of Court

Federal Bar Association

King County Bar Foundation

Sample of Legal Cases

Microsoft v. Motorola

After first trial, judge determined Microsoft should pay annual royalties of only $1.8 million, instead of $4 billion demanded by Motorola. After second trial, jury awarded Microsoft $14.5 million in damages and attorney fees.

Olympic Pipe Line Co. v. Shell Oil Co.

Settled for $3 million payment to client.

Jain v. J.P. Morgan

Western Mortgage v. KeyBank

Case against client dismissed on summary judgment. Client awarded fees and costs of defense.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2002

University of Washington

JD - Juris Doctor

1995

Williams College

BA

Speaking Engagements

N/A

In-House Training

Fiduciary Duties of Corporate Officers

Publications

2014

Washington Practice Chapter 48; CR 48, Juries of Less than Twelve

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution