Free Consultation
$0 first 120 minutes
PRO
also known as Phil Arnold
Virtual Consultation Available
Free Consultation
Over the years Phil has been named a Washington Super Lawyer, placed in the top 100 trial lawyers in the State of Washington, nationally nominated for Trial Lawyer of the Year, and received the Washington State Association for Justice President's Award for his work. He is a recipient of Martindale-Hubbell's highest (AV) rating for ethics and ability.
He is experienced in litigating plaintiff personal injury state and federal cases in Alaska, Montana, Idaho, Oregon, Minnesota, California and Washington. His cases in the product liability field have involved manufacturers in China, FInland, Germany, Taiwan, and the United States.
He limits his work to only representing seriously injured victims of defective products, motor vehicle accidents, medical negligence, maritime negligence, insurance bad faith, and other neglient acts. He has been fortunate to represent many union workers injured in the longshore, railroad and maritime industries.
In the Washington State Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals he represented injured victims in cases creating new law permitting children to recover when parents are seriously injured damaging the parent-child relationship, holding insurance companies accountable to their customers, and protecting railroad workers in employer provided housing.
For many years he participated and chaired the Washington State Bar Association's Court Rules and Procedures Committee formulating many of the rules used in civil litigation and personal injury actions.
He is driven by the belief that each case must be done right because for his client there is no second chance.
.
8
Practice Areas
Free Consultation
$0 first 120 minutes
33%-40%
State: Washington
Acquired: 1975
No misconduct found
State: Oregon
Acquired: 2008
No misconduct found
111 Queen Anne Avenue N, Suite 510, Seattle, WA, 98109
campichearnold.comShowing 1 - 5 of 5 client reviews from Avvo
Posted by Len | August 26, 2015 | Hired Attorney
I am a lawyer in Pennsylvania and I just completed a Products Liability case in Pennsylvania involving the alleged failure of a defective bicycle part manufactured in another country. I had a jurisdictional problem whereby personal jurisdiction over the foreign manufacturer was at issue in Pe...
Posted by Lululima | September 24, 2014
After a work related injury on a tugboat I was referred by my Union to Campiche/Arnold. After meeting Philip Arnold I immediately felt I was on my way to the greatest representation with an attorney who truly is well organized, patient, well prepared with researching all parts of my case. Mr. Arno...
Posted by anonymous | September 16, 2014
Phil was very easy to work with. Made me feel comfortable during a stressful time. He knows his job very well and did a great job for me.
Posted by Scott | September 10, 2014
Mr. Arnold was thorough attentive and affective. He worked tirelessly on my case. I really couldn't ask for more. My case was settled to my satisfaction and it was explained in great detail. I would both recommend and not hesitate in hiring Philip again. Awesome job!!
Posted by anonymous | September 9, 2014
If I was assembling a legal team to adjudicate a matter in his areas of expertise Phil would certainly be in my starting line up. Phil is one of the best and brightest. He worked on a large, complex case for me. He was thoughtful, deliberate and prepared. I observed him adeptly depose witnesses. He w...
"Phil is an outstanding lawyer with a brilliant legal mind. He sees every angle and pursues them relentlessly. He's particularly good at cases involving issues of safety and how a defendant--be it an employer, a product manufacturer, a property owner, or the like--caused there to be an unsafe condition. You can't go wrong seeking out Phil's help and advice!"
"I can easily endorse Phil as an outstanding attorney. Phil is a competent, professional, and experienced practitioner with a solid reputation in the community. He is also charismatic and caring, and will work relentlessly on behalf of his clients. I would definitely recommend Phil."
"I endorse this lawyer. Phil Arnold has been a stalwart champion of his clients rights for over 30 years. I have worked on several cases with Phil over the years and he is among the best and most dedicated trial lawyers in the state. I do not hesitate to refer clients to Phil."
"I strongly endorse Philip Arnold as one of the most brilliant and ethical attorneys in the state of Washington. Not only has he devoted decades to the representation of injured people, he has been awarded the prestigious President's Award by the Washington State Association of Justice as a leader among attorneys in the State. Since my early years as an attorney in 1993, I have relied on strategies and techniques taught by Philip in continuing legal education courses. He continues to be a terrific resource for other attorneys, always anxious to assist in solving problems and researching issues. On many occasions he has provided help that has made a difference to the outcome of the case. Never once has he said that he is too busy to offer such assistance. Philip also sets very high ethical standards for his practice . He is and has been for many years, one the premier attorneys in the state of Washington and has always been a formidable foe at trial."
"I highly and wholeheartedly endorse Phil Arnold. Phil is a brilliant attorney who will leave no stone uncovered in advocating for his clients. He provides his clients with superior legal services and tireless energy. Phil is highly respected by his colleagues and his adversaries. He is very smart and always comes up with unique solutions to complex legal issues. He is also a very effective trial attorney. Phil is one of those rare attorneys who truly has it all and is easily one of the best attorneys of our time."
"I have known Phil for many years. I have always been impressed with his comprehensive approach to cases and his genuine concern and caring for his clients. If you are considering Phil, give him a chance and you will not be disappointed."
Personal injury lawyer
2022
Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers
2021
Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers
2020
Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers
2019
Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers
2018
Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers
2017
Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers
2013
Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers
2006
Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers
2004
Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers
1995
AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
1992
President's Award, Washington State Trial Lawyers Association
1985
Nominated for Trial Lawyer of the Year, American Association for Justice
1974
Managing Editor Law Review, Gonzaga University School Of Law
N/A
AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
2010 - Present
Partner, Campiche Arnold
1900 - Present
Partner, Campiche Andrews Horne Trial Lawyers, PLLC
1996 - 1998
Washington State Bar AssociationMember, Court Congestion and Improvement Committee
1994 - 1995
Washington State Bar AssociationChair, WSB Court Rules & Procedures Committee
1990 - 1991
Washington State Bar AssociationMember, Interprofessional Committee
1989 - 1998
Washington State Bar AssociationMember Court Rules & Procedures Committee
1987 - 1992
Washington State Trial Lawyers AssociationSecond V.P. and Chair Court Rules Committee
The Washington State Court of Appeals held that an injured plaintiff has no duty to move or commute long distances to take a job to mitigate loss wage damages.
The Washington State Supreme Court found Hartford to have misappropriated the expert violating its duty of good faith by turning the expert's opinion.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the appointment of a Magistrate Judge without proper consent violates Article III of the United States Constitution.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recognized a new cause of action protecting railroad workers when working away from home and staying in employer paid housing.
The State Supreme Court recognized the right of children to recovery for damage to the patent-child relationship when a parent is injured.
1975
Doctor of Law (J.D.)
1972
BA
1995
Bread and Butter: Evidentiary Uses of Medical Records
1993
Proposed Rule Changes
1990
Admissions as Evidence
1995
1993
1990
English