Free Consultation
$0 first 30 minutes
also known as Jim
2
Practice Areas
Free Consultation
$0 first 30 minutes
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Washington
Acquired: 1981
No misconduct found
20201 Cedar Valley Rd Ste 140, Lynnwood, WA, 98036-6431
Showing 1 - 5 of 25 client reviews from Avvo
Posted by Debbie | May 17, 2025 | Hired Attorney
James and his staff have made a big difference dealing with LnI over the years. I would not be receiving my pension without their help. Thank you for all your help! - Debbie Ryden
Posted by James | March 20, 2024 | Hired Attorney
It was a long hard battle, I wouldn't wish my worst enemy To have to go through the abuse that L&I will put you threw but, Mr. Walsh told me to stay calm and do what's needed to do and what L&I asks. I went to all of my doctors appointments. Mr. Walsh was firm and consistent and got to job done...
Posted by George | November 11, 2023 | Hired Attorney
In the craziest 8.5 years of my life while battling my case it finally ended in my favor. Honestly at times I was nervous, unsure , stressed, depressed, and probably the biggest pain in the a.. to jim and the paralegals. All in all they stood by me and helped me get my claim closed and now I have ...
Posted by Danny | September 29, 2023 | Hired Attorney
James Walsh has been an excellent lawyer for has met all of my expectations.
Posted by Erin | September 29, 2023 | Hired Attorney
I hired Jim after my second neck injury on the job, as I was no longer able to work. I have wanted to throw in the towel more times than I can count, but with the support of Jim and his staff I was able to stay the course to a more than satisfactory settlement. I'm forever grateful for the knowledge,...
"Jim Walsh is an excellent worker's compensation attorney. He has knowledge of the law and has mastered the courtroom skills and tactics. Most attorneys don't go to court. Jim lives there. I would trust Jim to handle my own L&I claim."
"I endorse this lawyer. Jim shows vision and tenacity in achieving good results for clients we have shared and treats all with respect."
"I have had the pleasure of working with Jim Walsh for approximately four years. During this time, I have observed his resilient and tenacious approach that he takes with his clients' cases in giving them a voice in what can, at times, be an overwhelming situation. He approaches each case with passion and dedication, and goes above and beyond to provide his clients with outstanding representation. I endorse this lawyer."
Contracts and agreements lawyer
Workers compensation lawyer
Contracts and agreements lawyer
2019
2019 Attorney of the Year, Top 100 Registry
2014
Who's Who for Executives and Professionals, Who's Who In American Law
2011
Who's Who for Executives and Professionals, Who's Who In American Law
Eagle Member
Admitted to Practice
Admitted to Practice
Admitted to Practice
Member
The Court of Appeals, Becker, J., held that: the denial of application for workers' compensation disability benefits was Affirmed.
The Court of Appeals, Schindler, C.J., held that summary judgement was precluded, and that the King County Superior Court judgement was Reversed and Remanded.
The Supreme Court, Winfree, J., held that: the denial of workers' compensation claim be Reversed and Remanded.
Appellant was entitled to reinstatement of his lawsuit - Reversed and Remanded
The Supreme Court, Madsen, J., held that: Court of Appeals reversed; trial court judgment reinstated Stevedore's recoupment of an overpayment of benefits.
The Supreme Court, Smith, J., held that the reversed and remanded summary judgment of the employer was Affirmed.
The Court of Appeals, Coleman, J., held that: the order that required longshoreman to repay amount of overcompensation with interest was Reversed.
The Court of Appeals, Pekelis, Acting C.J., held that the employer's summary judgment be Reversed and Remanded.
The Supreme Court, Utter, J., held that: the lack of sufficiency to establish Claimant's employability for purposes of workers' compensation is Affirmed.
The Court of Appeals, Petrich, C.J., held that: the lack of sufficiency to establish employability of Claimant was Affirmed.
The Court of Appeals, Schroeder, Circuit Judge, held that: the Benefits Review Board awarding benefits under Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act was Affirmed.
The Board affirmed denial, Claimant then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
1981
JD - Juris Doctor
English