Free Consultation
$0 first 30 minutes
James R. Walsh
also known as Jim
About James
Practice Areas
2
Practice Areas
Fees and Rates
Cost
Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.
Search our directory
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withLicenses
Licensed in Washington for 44 years
State: Washington
Acquired: 1981
No misconduct found
Location
Law Office of James R. Walsh
20201 Cedar Valley Rd Ste 140, Lynnwood, WA, 98036-6431
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
James R. Walsh's Reviews
Avvo Review Score
25 Client Reviews
Filter Avvo Reviews (25)
Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Practice Areas
Showing 21 - 25 of 25 reviews
Posted by anonymous | March 27, 2014
James R. Walsh & Staff are totally AMAZING!!
Mr. James R. Walsh, Staci, Paralegal & Staff are totally amazing!! I have worked with other attorneys in the past with no success. I contacted Mr. Walsh’s office and was treated with patience, respect and like a family member. I thank God for leading me to his office. I have my life back thanks to...
Posted by Oliver | November 01, 2013
Appreciation of Mr. Walsh
I would feel that something is amiss without acknowledgment and an expression of appreciation that Mr. Walsh has given me. Mr. Walsh and his staff are very professional with personal qualities and respect given to me. I thank his office for their hard work. I would recommend Mr. Walsh to anyone th...
Posted by Larry N. | October 16, 2013
Great Lawyer
I hired Mr. Walsh in 1987. He worked extremely hard on my claim and secured all benefits that I needed. He is a great man.
Posted by Brett | November 30, 2010
Awesome
There isn't enough space for me to explain everything this man did for me over many years but to keep it short he is truly amazing.
Posted by Terry | September 09, 2009 | Workers Compensation
excellent L& I Lawer
Mr Walsh was my second and is my current L& I attorney. He got my case reopen and the three operations I needed and is still working with me and L& I. It does take time to get threw his office staff but well worth the wait. He has done me so much to the good I would recommend to anyone who needs h...
James R. Walsh's Lawyer Endorsements
"Jim Walsh is an excellent worker's compensation attorney. He has knowledge of the law and has mastered the courtroom skills and tactics. Most attorneys don't go to court. Jim lives there. I would trust Jim to handle my own L&I claim."
"I endorse this lawyer. Jim shows vision and tenacity in achieving good results for clients we have shared and treats all with respect."
"I have had the pleasure of working with Jim Walsh for approximately four years. During this time, I have observed his resilient and tenacious approach that he takes with his clients' cases in giving them a voice in what can, at times, be an overwhelming situation. He approaches each case with passion and dedication, and goes above and beyond to provide his clients with outstanding representation. I endorse this lawyer."
Samuel Leonard
Contracts and agreements lawyer
Lee Thomas
Workers compensation lawyer
Aaron Orheim
Contracts and agreements lawyer
Experience
Honors
2019
2019 Attorney of the Year, Top 100 Registry
2014
Who's Who for Executives and Professionals, Who's Who In American Law
2011
Who's Who for Executives and Professionals, Who's Who In American Law
Associations
Washington State Association for Justice
Eagle Member
US District Court - Western District of Washington
Admitted to Practice
US District Court - Eastern District of Washington
Admitted to Practice
US Court of Appeals - Ninth Circuit
Admitted to Practice
Washington State Bar Association
Member
Sample of Legal Cases
Elliot v. Department of Labor and Industries, Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
The Court of Appeals, Becker, J., held that: the denial of application for workers' compensation disability benefits was Affirmed.
Johnson v. UBAR, LLC, Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
The Court of Appeals, Schindler, C.J., held that summary judgement was precluded, and that the King County Superior Court judgement was Reversed and Remanded.
Nghi Kim v. Alyeska Seafoods, Inc., Supreme Court of Alaska
The Supreme Court, Winfree, J., held that: the denial of workers' compensation claim be Reversed and Remanded.
Plouffe v. Rook, Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
Appellant was entitled to reinstatement of his lawsuit - Reversed and Remanded
Stevedoring Services of America, Inc. v. Eggert, Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
The Supreme Court, Madsen, J., held that: Court of Appeals reversed; trial court judgment reinstated Stevedore's recoupment of an overpayment of benefits.
Loveridge v. Fred Meyer, Inc., Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
The Supreme Court, Smith, J., held that the reversed and remanded summary judgment of the employer was Affirmed.
Stevedoring Services of America, Inc. v. Eggert, Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1
The Court of Appeals, Coleman, J., held that: the order that required longshoreman to repay amount of overcompensation with interest was Reversed.
Loveridge v. Fred Meyer, Inc., Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
The Court of Appeals, Pekelis, Acting C.J., held that the employer's summary judgment be Reversed and Remanded.
ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. Dalman, Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
The Supreme Court, Utter, J., held that: the lack of sufficiency to establish Claimant's employability for purposes of workers' compensation is Affirmed.
ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. Dalman, Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
The Court of Appeals, Petrich, C.J., held that: the lack of sufficiency to establish employability of Claimant was Affirmed.
J.M. Martinac Shipbuilding v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
The Court of Appeals, Schroeder, Circuit Judge, held that: the Benefits Review Board awarding benefits under Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act was Affirmed.
Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp., 22 BRBS 242 (1989)
The Board affirmed denial, Claimant then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Education
1981
Gonzaga University School of Law
JD - Juris Doctor
Languages
English