Arthur William Lazear

Arthur William Lazear

5.0
Rating: 7.0

Licensed for 47 years

Class action Lawyer at Oakland, CA
Practice Areas: Class Action, Employment & Labor, General Practice ... +2 more

436-14th Street, #1117, Oakland, CA

About Arthur

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Class Action 30%

Experienced in successful employment related Class Action litigation since prevailing against Continental Can in the mid 1980s

38 years | 40 cases

30%
Employment and Labor 30%

Worked diligently on behalf of unions and workers' rights since 1978, including United Steelworkers of America, Communications Workers of America, AFGE & SEIU among others

47 years | 100 cases

30%
General Practice 20%

Handled dissolutions, criminal representation, contract disputes and many other legal issues over a decades long career

47 years | 50 cases

20%
Discrimination 15%

Worked with multiple individuals to successfully protect their rights when they suffered from workplace discrimination and harrassment

47 years | 20 cases

15%
Employee Benefits 5%

Worked with numerous individuals over a lengthy career to help them understand their rights and benefits at termination and during employment negotiations

47 years | 20 cases

5%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 60 minutes

Hourly Rates

$ 250-525 per hour

Contingency

25%-40%

Retainer

Sometimes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 47 years

State: California

Acquired: 1978

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Lazear Mack

436-14th Street, #1117, Oakland, CA, 94612

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Arthur William Lazear's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

Filter Avvo Reviews (1) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 1
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review

Posted by Mia | December 18, 2014

Professional and Caring

I have used Arthur for all of my legal needs for the past 10 years. He and his team have been amazing! Arthur kept me informed every step of the way in all my matters and was always willing to take the time to explain everything clearly, no matter how complicated. Arthur does amazing work and It is ...very clear that he cares!

See All Client Reviews

Arthur William Lazear's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Arthur
Alexander George Van Broek headshot
Alexander Van Broek

Employment and labor lawyer | Jan 15

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I have known Arthur for many years and consider him to be an expert in labor and employment law. I have enjoyed working with Arthur on several cases. His writing skills, legal analysis, and court room demeanor are all excellent."

View All Endorsements
Rachel H. Rosenfeld headshot
Rachel Rosenfeld

Probate lawyer

Stephanie Rubinoff headshot
Stephanie Rubinoff

Employment and labor lawyer

John Malcolm Kelson headshot
John Kelson

Employment and labor lawyer

Alexander George Van Broek headshot
Alexander Van Broek

Employment and labor lawyer

Experience

Rating:  7.0 (Very Good)

Work Experience

1984 - 2012

Managing Partner, Hoffman & Lazear

Associations

2011 - Present

American College of Trial Lawyers, National Moot Court Competition Committee

Assistant Coach

Alameda County Bar Association

Sample of Legal Cases

Terrones v. Pacific States Steel and Cordoza v. Pacific States Steel (N.D. Cal.)

Successful; ongoing

Carr v. Starbucks (C.D. Cal.)

Successful settlement

Nelson v. Essex Properties (Alameda County)

Settled successfully

Burns v. Merrill Lynch; Garrett v. Morgan Stanley; Bahramipour v. Citigroup (N. D. Cal.)

Successful

Walker v. Macy's (N.D. Cal.)

Successful

Kahle v. Pacific Bell; Kelly v. Pacific Bell; Critzer v. Pacific Bell (All N.D. Cal.)

Successful outcome

McLendon v. Continental Can (D. N.J. -- National) and Amaro v. Continental Can (C.D. Cal. -- California)

Successful recovery on behalf of class

See More Legal Cases

Education

N/A

UC Berkeley SOL Boalt Hall

law

N/A

Univ of California Berkeley

undergraduate

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution