We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
1
Practice Area
28 years
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: California
Acquired: 1997
No misconduct found
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 1125, San Francisco, CA, 94111
Showing 1 - 2 of 2 client reviews from Avvo
Posted by anonymous | July 27, 2023 | Consulted Attorney
I consulted with many attorneys and found Ms. Renaker to be the most experienced. What's surprising was that she was also very compassionate and down to earth, which I don't see very often in attorneys. Thank you Ms. Renaker.
Posted by anonymous | February 3, 2013
Teresa is the best of the best. We were lucky enough to have Teresa represent us in two cases. Both cases dealt with insurance companies. Teresa was absolutely outstanding in both situations. The first case was a complex case where the disability insurance company only knew the word "NO". ...
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
2014
Alumna of the Year, California Law Review
2022 - Present
Partner, Renaker Scott LLP
2015 - 2022
Partner, Renaker Hasselman Scott LLP
2003 - 2015
Shareholder, Lewis, Feinberg, Lee, Renaker & Jackson, PC
1997 - 2002
Associate Attorney, Lewis & Feinberg, P.C.
1996 - 1997
Law Clerk, United States District Court, Southern District of California
1988 - 1993
Editorial Supervisor/Staff Copy Editor/Copy Editor, Matthew Bender & Co.
2014 - 2017
ABA Commission on Sexual Orientation and Gender IdentityCommissioner
2014 - 2017
Bar Association of San FranciscoBoard Member
2008 - 2010
American Bar Association, Tort Trial and Insurance Practice SectionChair, Employee Benefits Committee
2006 - 2014
American Bar Association, Joint Committee on Employee BenefitsMember
Professional negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims against plan service provider held not preempted by ERISA
ERISA-governed pension plan with California choice-of-law provision must pay surviving spouse annuity to deceased participant's registered domestic partner.
Class action for breach of fiduciary duty in investing plan assets allowed to go forward.
Class action for breach of fiduciary duty certified; motion to dismiss denied.
Class action for breach of fiduciary duty certified; motion to dismiss denied.
Dismissal reversed; claim for actuarial malpractice allowed to proceed
Summary judgment for plaintiff in class action for retiree medical benefits
Profit-sharing plan account awarded to surviving same-sex spouse
Motion to dismiss granted on grounds that plan was not an ERISA plan
1996
JD - Juris Doctor
1986
BA - Bachelor of Arts
2019
Counseling Clients Through the Claims Process With an Eye Toward Litigation
2018
Unraveling the Challenges Relative to Executive and CEO Compensation from Defined Benefits and the Resulting Fallout in Top-Hat Litigation
2017
A Man Walks Into an ERISA Law Office
2017
Writing ERISA Out of the Plan
2017
What’s New in the World of Individual Benefit Claims: The Battle Over Discretionary Clauses, Venue Selection Concerns, Statute of Limitations Challenges and Preemption
2016
2016
Effectively Anticipating Litigation: Venue, Arbitration, and Other Magic Clauses
2016
Employer Stock Funds: Fiduciary Processes for Keeping or Shuttering Them
2016
Advocating for the Rights of LGBT Employees
2016
Sexual Orientation Discrimination: The Legal Case for Coverage Under Title VII
2016
Upcoming U.S. Supreme Court Decisions
2016
2016
2010
2007
2006
2005
2005
2004
English