E.K. v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.
Nov 01, 2021OUTCOME: Allegations of $1 M plus liability; L.C. 132a; 100% PTD, based on stroke. After extended discovery and aggressive cross-examination, case settled for nominal sum of $19,000. Client ecstatic.
San Francisco, CA
Litigation Lawyer at San Francisco, CA
Practice Areas: Litigation
OUTCOME: Allegations of $1 M plus liability; L.C. 132a; 100% PTD, based on stroke. After extended discovery and aggressive cross-examination, case settled for nominal sum of $19,000. Client ecstatic.
OUTCOME: After Three (3) Trials, Trial Judge Agreed With Defendants And Vacated Order Disallowing Further Discovery, and Allowed Defendants To Further Develop the Legal Record. Plaintiff's counsel appealed, but was denied. Clients Extremely Happy at Result.
OUTCOME: Allegations of Employer Discrimination Based on Failure to Provide Reasonable Accommodation, 132a, and Wrongful Termination; Demanded $54,000, But After Two (2) Depositions, Plaintiff Accepted $5,000 For Full Settlement.
OUTCOME: Lien Claimant had lien of $15,771. Through legal argument and negotiations, lien claimant agreed to accept $6,250 in full satisfaction of lien.
OUTCOME: On day of trial, after exhaustive legal research and zealous advocacy, co-defendant dismissed client as defendant without prejudice. Clients extremely happy at result and cost savings.
OUTCOME: Lien Claimant had lien of $17,908. Through legal argument and negotiations, lien claimant agreed to accept $3,800 in full satisfaction of lien. Client extremely happy.
OUTCOME: Lien Claimant had lien of $26,827.55. Through legal argument and negotiations, lien claimant agreed to accept $4,200 in full satisfaction of lien. Client extremely happy.
OUTCOME: Lien Claimant had lien of $4,295.64. Through legal argument and negotiations, lien claimant agreed to accept $900 in full satisfaction of lien. Client extremely happy.
OUTCOME: Lien Claimant had lien of $38,633.72. Through legal argument and negotiations, lien claimant agreed to accept $2,700 in full satisfaction of lien. Client extremely happy.
OUTCOME: Co-Defendant tried to recover $44K from client. Instead, client recovered $35K from co-defendant. Client extremely happy.