Salvatore Peter Ciulla

Salvatore Peter Ciulla

4.7
Rating: 8.2

Licensed for 44 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at Santa Ana, CA
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense

1043 Civic Center Dr W Ste 200, Santa Ana, CA

About Salvatore

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Criminal Defense 100%

Criminal defense of all misdemeanor and felony offenses in state, federal and juvenile courts.

40 years | 3,000 cases

100%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 44 years

State: California

Acquired: 1981

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Salvatore Peter Ciulla

1043 Civic Center Dr W Ste 200, Santa Ana, CA, 92703

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Salvatore Peter Ciulla's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.7 /5.0

12 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (12) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | 1 star

Posted by JODI | October 14, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense

FORGETFUL. UNPROFESSIONAL. UNTRUSTWORTHY. RIP OFF

SAVE YOUR MONEY. If I could give Salvatore Ciulla ZERO STARS, I would. I paid Sal over $50,000 for his “services.” After the payment, he revealed that he actually hires a private investigator to manage all the work, which would mean additional costs on top of what I already spent. This case dragged o...n for seven and a half years. With each passing year, Sal seemed to forget more details. About a year into the case, I provided him with documents that proved my innocence. Yet, at every court date, he would ask me about those same documents, indicating that he hadn’t bothered to review them at all. I ended up shelling out an additional $20,000 for the private investigator. After sifting through thousands of pages of discovery, he reached the conclusion that I had not broken any laws. However, during each court appearance, Sal appeared bewildered and resorted to intimidation tactics, trying to pressure me into accepting a plea deal from the District Attorney. Several times, when he and the DA were discussing the case in the courthouse hallway, he would shoo me away, clearly not wanting me to overhear their conversation. This struck me as highly suspicious. When I confronted him, asking, "Are you working for me or the DA?" he became very defensive and snapped, "I'm not going to argue with you." It was clear he didn’t want to advocate for me either, and he seemed offended when I refused to accept a plea deal. During one of the hearings, which extended beyond the usual 10 minutes, I felt that he was pressuring me into accepting a deal that wasn't in my best interest. I wanted a second and third opinion, so I reached out to a few attorneys I had worked with in the past. They practice law in states outside of California, or else I would have hired one of them instead of Sal. Sal grew frustrated, repeatedly checking his watch and tapping his shoe against the floor, unmistakably agitated. Before each of the many court appearances, I would reach out to him, either by call or text, hoping for an update, but he always ignored my messages. Sal, who is in his 70s, might be showing early signs of dementia, and I say this with genuine concern. He frequently arrived late and often seemed oblivious to what was going on around him. He always appeared quite dazed and confused. After everything was settled, I received a sentence of probation. He hurried me to check in with the probation office, even though I had 48 hours to do so. When I checked in, they informed me that I couldn’t leave the state until my probation was approved by the state I currently reside in. When I asked Sal if he was aware that I would be stuck in California after checking in, he responded, "I can't be bothered with this; my wife is in the hospital." It’s unbelievable that Sal failed to inform me that checking in would require me to stay in California for potentially weeks. He should have informed me about this so I could have arranged my affairs beforehand. I have children, a pet, work, and other responsibilities. I honestly think he forgot about the probation process, just as he seems to have forgotten everything else. Sal Ciulla was unprofessional and unaware throughout my entire 7.5-year case. In my opinion, he has no business ACTING as an attorney.

See All Client Reviews

Salvatore Peter Ciulla's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Salvatore
Ronald G. Brower headshot
Ronald Brower

Criminal defense lawyer | Apr 19

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I have known Sal Ciulla for over twenty-five (25) years. He was when I first met him, and continues to be, one of the best criminal defense attorneys in the county. I would choose him to represent anyone in my family if they were in trouble. He is held in great esteem by all facets of the legal community in Orange County."

Michael S. Waddington headshot
Michael Waddington

Criminal defense lawyer | Jun 05

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Salvatore. He is a highly skilled attorney that is well respected in the legal community."

Mark William Fredrick headshot
Mark Fredrick

Criminal defense lawyer | Apr 02

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I have been admiring Sal Ciulla's lawyering skills for over twenty years. I have seen him get results for his clients that most lawyers would not even believe possible. He is a skilled trial lawyer who knows the "ins and outs" of the court system. Mr. Ciulla gets my highest recommendation. I would not hesitate to refer him to my closest family and friends."

Martina Anne Vigil headshot
Martina Vigil

Criminal defense lawyer | Mar 25

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Sal and I worked on a very serious case together in the Central Justice Center in Santa Ana. His professionalism was incredible and the advocacy he put forth for his client was memorable. It didn't hurt that he also knew the prosecutor and the judge assigned to the matter because he is in this courthouse every day. Sal's clients are lucky to have him as their attorney and i am happy to have him as a colleague."

View All Endorsements
Mark William Fredrick headshot
Mark Fredrick

Criminal defense lawyer

Martina Anne Vigil headshot
Martina Vigil

Criminal defense lawyer

Ronald G. Brower headshot
Ronald Brower

Criminal defense lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.2 (Excellent)

Honors

1981

William P. Hogoboom Award, Loyola Law School

Work Experience

1986 - Present

Criminal Defense Attorney, Law Office of Salvatore P. Ciulla

1982 - 1986

Deputy District Attorney, Orange County District Attorney's Office

Education

1981

Loyola Law School

Juris Doctor/Law

1978

Univ of California San Diego

Bachelor of Arts

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution