Zachary James Levine

Zachary James Levine

also known as Zack Levine

4.1
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 16 years

Gaming Lawyer at Glendale, CA
Practice Areas: Gaming, Business, Contracts & Agreements ... +2 more

535 North Brand Blvd., Suite 300, Glendale, CA

About Zachary

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Business 25%

16 years

25%
Gaming 25%

16 years

25%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes

Hourly Rates

$ 300-450 per hour

Contingency

20%-40%


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 16 years

State: California

Acquired: 2009

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Wolk & Levine, LLP

535 North Brand Blvd., Suite 300, Glendale, CA, 91203

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Zachary James Levine's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.1 /5.0

9 Client Reviews

5 star (7)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (2)

Posted by anonymous | March 23, 2021 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Quality experience, excellent negotiator

I am a landlord who experienced a very bad tenant who took advantage of the 2020 Tenant Relief Act by failing to pay rent and then moving out before the January 31, 2021 deadline to pay. She then filed a civil lawsuit with a value of up to $25,000 claiming all sorts of erroneous damages. Zack was abl...e to clarify to the other side that there were no real damages and settle the case for only $2,000. I could have filed a cross complaint for what I was rightfully owned in unpaid rent, property damage, cleaning and painting fees, but I chose not to drag this out for 18 months. I thank Zack for handling this matter with quality and professionalism. Myself, I will need to do a better job of vetting these losers.

Posted by Christopher | September 15, 2020 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Be Careful Please

Cons: It is with no pleasure I have to author this review. Mr. Levine was hired as the attorney and worked with me for 2 years. Over the course of those two years over $200,000 was spent on his services. Levine failed in providing billing statements sent to our insurance, he resigned for his own... conflict of interest that left the corporation crippled and without legal counsel familiar with ongoing cases. Levine refused to do the work required for the last 3 months waiting for the court to accept his resignation which they finally did. Zachary Levine also failed to properly represent the corporation and lied to a Judge in the Van Nuys Courthouse on floor 6 about access to records he was given at least twice. Facts regarding this matter are specific but can't be disclosed according to the guidelines for AVVO. Public record exists regarding these facts. In 2 affirmative TRO cases, Levine misrepresented to me and the corporation his intentions by specifically encouraging a dismissal opting to incorporate it into a Civil Harassment Lawsuit for which he resigned prior to cases being heard. The timing of Levine's resignation couldn't have been better for opposing counsel and interests as again the circumstances behind his resignations are suspect to all involved. Again, these cases are a matter of public record and can easily be identified as facts. Mr. Levine was sanctioned in another case while allowing a separate case to go into default. These two cases are being held in the Van Nuys Courthouse. Mr. Levine was to send subpoena's out and at least 6 times & failed. The court had to step in and question why Mr. Levine couldn't complete service on a witness. After an incident at a Bank in Agoura Hills, Mr. Levine advised he would be submitting to the bank preservation of evidence request and failed to do so and/or failed to provide documentation before he resigned. Mr. Levine was used as an inspector of an election but failed to state that the Davis Stirling Act prohibits attorneys from already hired to act as such instead said since the CPA was used in the past it was OK for him to participate and be paid. Mr. Levine failed on several occasions to file affirmative actions regarding theft of equipment and breaking and entering claiming it was a criminal matter when in fact it was still a civil matter regarding an ongoing lawsuit. Levine's average days of invoice outstanding over the span of 2 years was 22.5 calendar days. In one of the major cases Levine managed to stretch out the court and Plaintiffs over 2 years and to this day still no trial date was ever set. Levine was given both general counsel and attorney of record in all matters in an effort to consolidate legal representation and a more fluid representation. The help that was promised because of the increased load was sporadic at best and failed to meet the most minimum requirement. Pros: When Mr. Levine is in-tune with a case he provides above-average representation and articulated his thoughts and knowledge of the law well. He is also an active listener and rarely if ever interrupts his clients and waits patiently to hear what is being said. Overall: Mr. Levine was deceptive and inconsistent with his billing practices. He failed to complete tasks in the required amount of time. His lack of time management left for little to no time to review documentation prior to filing. Levine Works for Wolk and Levine they a couple and with that comes to some uncomfortable situations regarding communications with each. A failure to disclose that very personal relationship came off as necessarily deceptive as anyone can imagine. I highly encourage anyone that reads this review in its entirety to please take my review seriously, this has been a horrific experience for so many people. My name is given for a reason.

Posted by Minda | August 23, 2017 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Highly Recommend

It is my great pleasure to recommend attorney Zack Levine and his partner Sarah. They have been a fantastic team, updating my will, reading and explaining new HOA rules for my home, re-writing a real estate contract and running a patent search. I couldn't ask for better representation. They are co...mmitted, talented and very professional offering absolutely outstanding service!

Posted by Tammy | August 14, 2017 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Horrible Experience when I retained Zack Levine for my dissolution of marriage

On October 4, 2013, I retained Zachary Levine as my attorney to defend me since I had been recently served divorce papers by my husband. On March 3, 2014, I was informed by my attorney, Zachary Levine, that there had been a court hearing on February 13, 2014 in which I was ordered to pay my husb...and $4830 a month in spousal support retroactive back to January 1, 2014. I was also ordered to pay my husbands attorney fees of 20K. Needless to say I was in shock and disbelief in this amount as it was close my entire income. I called and emailed Zachary Levine many questions as to why I was not told about the hearing date, how the judge ordered such an erroneous amount, and why was I learning about this now, 19 days after the hearing? After ordering a transcript from the court of the hearing, I noticed that Zachary Levine was not present at my hearing but sent someone from his office, Mackenzie Brown, whom I never met or spoke to, and whom did not come to the hearing prepared with the necessary paperwork showing my income and expenses. Therefore the judge granted my husband what he asked for which was $4830 a month. I not only had to over pay spousal support for 4 months until it was corrected, I also had to pay my new attorney over $10K to file motions to to fix the messes Zachary Levine made.

Posted by Mher | July 21, 2017 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Great experience... worked with Mr. Levine for about 10 years

I've been working with Wolk & Levine for about 10 years. Mr. Levine has consistently provided us with excellent service for both business and personal matters. I truly feel that he always has our best interest in mind and I have not gone wrong when following his advice.

See All Client Reviews

Zachary James Levine's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Zachary
Jonathan Christopher Tobin headshot
Jonathan Tobin

Intellectual property lawyer | Sep 07

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Can't say much more than has already been said about Mr. Levine. Sharp, professional, with an eye for good cases and clients."

Brian Russell Michaels headshot
Brian Michaels

Gaming lawyer | Feb 03

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Benjamin M Hill headshot
Benjamin Hill

Trademark infringement lawyer | Nov 20

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I encountered Mr. Lowenstein as an adversary in a trademark matter. Zack was steadfast in his defense of his client's interests and has an impressive wealth of knowledge in the field of IP. I endorse this lawyer.."

Anabella Quevedo Bonfa headshot
Anabella Bonfa

Business lawyer | Sep 19

Relationship: Supervised lawyer

"I worked with Zach Levine for the same firm and had the opportunity to review his work. Zach is a great lawyer and great writer. He takes time to really think about his client's legal issues and take the right approach to taking care of their problems. I recommend him highly."

Jesse Dameron Terrell headshot
Jesse Terrell

Intellectual property lawyer | Aug 31

Relationship: Worked for lawyer

"Zack is an expert in his field. There is no attorney I would more highly recommend in the areas of intellectual property, licensing, and complex commercial contracts."

John Mark Griffin headshot
John Griffin

Litigation lawyer | Mar 02

Relationship: Worked for lawyer

"I endorse this lawyer."

Michael Dennis Scott headshot
Michael Scott

Lawsuits and disputes lawyer | Feb 11

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. He has the ability to quickly work through the facts of a case to identify the gist of the dispute, and is extremely competent in both pre-trial and trial work."

S. Jacob Babachanian headshot
S. Jacob Babachanian

Lawsuits and disputes lawyer | Nov 26

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"As a mediator, I've seen Zachary Levine act as a member of a team of effective advocates successfully dealing with an emotionally charged litigated case. Zachary's hard work contributed to a well prepared case that ultimately benefitted his clients causing me to endorse Zachary's work."

Lonnie L Mcdowell headshot
Lonnie Mcdowell

Business lawyer | Oct 19

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I've known Zachary since first year of law school. I fully endorse his work. Why? Because I've always found him to be conscientious, very hard working, knowledgeable and extremely dedicated to his clients. It's for these attributes that I recommend him to my clients when they need a business attorney."

Emmanuel S Vargas headshot
Emmanuel Vargas

Litigation lawyer | Oct 15

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Zack is a diligent and thoughtful attorney. He works very hard; and he adds considerable skill and creativity to deliver the best possible results for his clients. I hope to work with Zack and his team on other matters in the very near future. I endorse this lawyer."

Daniel R Kimbell headshot
Daniel Kimbell

Patent infringement lawyer | Oct 05

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I have worked with Zach doing patent prosecution for one of his litigation clients and am very impressed with the skill and aplomb with which he has gotten up to speed on very complex patent law issues. I have also witnessed Zack interaction with his clients, and appreciate his deep commitment to serving their needs and getting the best possible results. Zack is smart and a zealous and hardworking advocate for his clients. I strongly recommend Zack Levine."

Christopher Matthew Wheeler headshot
Christopher Wheeler

Intellectual property lawyer | Oct 02

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Zach is a consummate advocate and counselor with an impressive sense of how taking a particular action will alter the “big picture” for his clients. As managing partner of his firm, Zach has the personal experience of starting, building, and running a business. Buttressed by empathy and a no-nonsense approach to transactions and litigation, Zach’s style is clam and clever."

David Alexander Russomanno headshot
David Russomanno

Intellectual property lawyer | Oct 01

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Mr. Levine is a conscientious, honest and knowledgeable lawyer. He has earned the respect and admiration of peers and clients alike and handles his client's cases with diligence and a unique flair for novel strategy. I highly endorse this lawyer."

Jessica Nicole Trotter headshot
Jessica Trotter

Unknown lawyer | Aug 18

Relationship: Co-worker

"Zack is an enormously creative and hardworking attorney. From contract drafting, to intellectual property registration and maintenance, to business formation and protection, Zack's knowledge is extensive and his work-product second-to-none."

Christian Cleatus Counts headshot
Christian Counts

Lawsuits and disputes lawyer | Jun 15

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"A very creative and clever lawyer."

Torsten Michael Bassell headshot
Torsten Bassell

Intellectual property lawyer | Jan 20

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Zach Levine is a top-notch lawyer that has an excellent track record. I met Zach a number of years ago and count myself lucky to have made his acquaintance. Since I met him, I have discovered that he is an excellent IP and contract lawyer that works doggedly to get the best results possible for his clients. Moreover, Zach's legal prowess and high ethical standards have made him well-known in the legal community as an attorney that can be trusted and that can get results. I would highly recommend his services to any potential clients that are looking for an excellent lawyer that will put their interests first."

Hooman Kazemi headshot
Hooman Kazemi

Contracts and agreements lawyer | Jan 03

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Mr. Levine is a savvy lawyer. He is quickly able to determine the best approach for each individual client's situation. Whether it be an adversarial approach during a contract dispute or a cooperative approach to make sure the deal goes through, Mr. Levine is always ready to secure the best possible results for his clients."

Nima Farboody headshot
Nima Farboody

Contracts and agreements lawyer | Dec 10

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer's work."

Sarah Rose Wolk headshot
Sarah Wolk

Contracts and agreements lawyer | Dec 09

Relationship: Co-worker

"Zack is an extremely knowledgeable attorney. His work is always thorough, especially the contracts he drafts. I have full confidence in his work as my co-worker and frequently ask him his opinion on various legal topics. And, Zack is easy to work with and friendly!"

View All Endorsements
S. Jacob Babachanian headshot
S. Jacob Babachanian

Litigation lawyer

Jessica Nicole Trotter headshot
Jessica Trotter

Litigation lawyer

Emmanuel S Vargas headshot
Emmanuel Vargas

Bankruptcy and debt lawyer

David Alexander Russomanno headshot
David Russomanno

Criminal defense lawyer

Christian Cleatus Counts headshot
Christian Counts

Employment and labor lawyer

Hooman Kazemi headshot
Hooman Kazemi

Criminal defense lawyer

Nima Farboody headshot
Nima Farboody

Contracts and agreements lawyer

Sarah Rose Wolk headshot
Sarah Wolk

Contracts and agreements lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2010

Editorial Advisory Board, Cyberspace Lawyer

2010

Editorial Advisory Board, E-Commerce Law Report

2009

Volunteer of the Year, Kitten Rescue

2008

CALI Award - Information Privacy Law, The Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction

2007

2006/2007 Best Practice Round Judge, Southwestern Moot Court Board of Governors

2006

2nd Place Oralist, John Marshall Information Technology and Privacy Moot Court Competition

Work Experience

2015 - Present

Adjunct Professor, Glendale University College of Law

2013 - Present

Partner, Wolk & Levine, LLP

2013 - Present

Adjunct Professor, Southwestern Law School

2012 - Present

General Counsel, Verdant Resource, FPC

2009 - Present

General Counsel, Parrots First

2009 - 2012

Partner, Wolk Levine & Trotter, LLP

2009 - 2009

, Coggan & Tarlow

2008 - 2009

, Johnson, Cebula & Rygh

2007 - 2008

Research Assistant, Southwestern Law

Associations

2012 - Present

Glendale Bar Association

Attorney Member

2012 - Present

The Association of Media and Entertainment Counsel

Attorney Member

2011 - Present

Glendale Chamber of Commerce

2010 - Present

Cyberspace Lawyer

Editorial Advisory Board

2010 - Present

E-Commerce Law Report

Editorial Advisory Board

2010 - Present

Glendale Bar Association

2010 - Present

Beverly Hills Bar Association

2010 - Present

American Bar Association, Intellectual Property Law Section

2009 - Present

American Bar Association

2009 - Present

Parrots First

Volunteer counsel

2008 - Present

Kitten Rescue

Volunteer

2002 - Present

Parrots First

Volunteer

State Bar of California

2008 - 2008

Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles

Volunteer Santa Monica Clinic

2007 - 2008

General Relief Advocacy Project

Volunteer

Sample of Legal Cases

Insomniac, Inc. v. InsomniacTickets.com

Settled

Malibu Film Foundation v. Nunzio Fazio, et al.

Declaratory relief granted in favor of client

Tomas S. v. BHS, et al.

Settled

Imperial et al. v. Yutadco et al.

Settled.

Gilbert Lerma dba Stylistics Car Club v. Stylistics Los Angeles Car Club, Inc.

Motion for Summary Judgment granted in favor of client

Yasgar v. Grow, et al.

Settled

Petrosyan v. AAMCO

So v. BHN2, LLC et al

Settled

Machtolff et al. v. Pearson et al.

Settlement and concurrent use agreement.

NVMK Sales DBA Nandog Pet Gear v. Adrian Beyaz

Dismissed; opposing party's application terminated

Hatch et al v. Campbell et al.

Settled during trial.

Powerbox International AB v. Powerbox, Inc.

Case against our client dismissed with prejudice.

Southwest Graphic Services et al. v. McMahon et al.

Settled

Center BMW v. Samantha Torres

Starkman v. Woodward, et al.

United Fabrics International, Inc. v. Alliar, inc. et al.

Settled

Strupp v. Ziazie, et al.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2008

Southwestern University School of Law

Juris Doctorate

2004

University of California - San Diego

Undergraduate

Speaking Engagements

2017

Introduction to Art Law Panel

Art Law

2017

Glendale Tech Week Tools for your Business

2017

Entertainment Law and Emerging Web

Social Networking and the Law

2013

Los Angeles Story Expo 2013 Entertainment Law Crash Course

2013

Entertainment Law and Web 2.0

Law Firm Marketing

2013

Drafting and Negotiating Technology Agreements

Outsourcing Law

2013

Blueprint: Law for Creatives

Intellectual Property

2012

Starting a business and protecting your intellectual property

Business law and intellectual property

2012

Mock Interview Program

Interviews

2012

Intellectual Property Law Society Meeting

Starting an Intellectual Property Law Firm

2012

Entertainment Law and Web 2.0

Social Networking and the Law

2011

Entertainment Law and Web 2.0

Social Networking and the Law

2011

Drafting and Negotiating Technology Agreements

Contract Drafting and Negotiation

2010

Entertainment Law and Web 2.0

Social Networking and the Law

2010

Drafting and Negotiating Technology Agreements - Southwestern Law School Class

Contract Drafting and Negotiating

2007

Oral and Written Appellate Argument Guidance

Appellate Arguments

Publications

2012

Cyberspace Lawyer Private Employee Blog That Perpetuates Coworker Harassment is Sufficiently Related to the Workplace to Impose Liability on an Employer

2012

Cyberspace Lawyer Restrictions on live-streaming and archiving of court proceedings may constitute unconstitutional prior restraints

2012

Cyberspace Lawyer Misuse of an automatic email service through Facebook or another social networking site can lead to liability under the CAN-SPAM Act, the CFAA, and California Penal Code § 502

2012

Cyberspace Lawyer Potential liability for defamation and false light as a result of Wikipedia entries

2012

Cyberspace Lawyer All members of a data loss class action must suffer, and allege, sufficient harm to establish standing

2012

Cyberspace Lawyer The Ninth Circuit Weighs In On The Application of FACTA to Emailed Receipts and Offers Drafting Tips for Forum Selection Clauses

2012

Cyberspace Lawyer Section 512(h) Subpoenas Are Limited to Current Infringing Activity

2012

Cyberspace Lawyer CDA Section 230 Provides Immunity to eBay for Tortious Conduct of Its Sellers

2012

Cyberspace Lawyer Automated Domain Forwarding by GoDaddy Does Not Constitute Contributory Cybersquatting

2012

Cyberspace Lawyer 50-Year Harassment Restraining Order Upheld Against Scorned Lover Turned Angry Blogger

2012

Cyberspace Lawyer Clickwrap, Browsewrap, and now Referencewrap?

2012

E-Commerce Law Report Updates from the Cloud

2012

Law Commentator Starting a Business and Protecting Your Intellectual Property

2011

Cyberspace Lawyer Presence of Flash Cookies Insufficient Damage to Support Standing

2011

Cyberspace Lawyer WoW Users Are Only Licensees but Glider Users Are Not Copyright Infringers

2011

Cyberspace Lawyer Court Denies Summary Judgment Motion from Marketing Company Sued for the Alleged Infringement of its Client’s Website

2011

Cyberspace Lawyer SDNY Gives Sellify a Lesson in Agency Law

2011

Cyberspace Lawyer Trademark Owner Loses Rights Through Naked Licensing

2011

Cyberspace Lawyer Less Spam on Facebook!

2011

Cyberspace Lawyer The Direct Marketing Association is granted a preliminary injunction against Colorado’s new tax collection obligations imposed on out-of-state retailers

2011

Cyberspace Lawyer Softech Denied Preliminary Injunction Due to Essential Step Defense

2011

Cyberspace Lawyer Only the holder of an exclusive right has standing to bring a claim for copyright infringement

2011

Cyberspace Lawyer The FTC is not required to show substantial injury that was not reasonably avoidable by consumers in a deception case

2011

Cyberspace Lawyer Previous DMCA take-down notices do not shift the burden to a service provider to conduct a search for additional infringing content

2011

Cyberspace Lawyer A violation of your employer’s computer use policy can mean a violation of the CFAA

2011

Cyberspace Lawyer Fun With Unilateral Contracts (Stebbins v. Wal-Mart Stores Arkansas)

2011

Cyberspace Lawyer Domain Registrar Found Liable for Improper Transfer of Domain Name

2011

Cyberspace Lawyer NCAA Student-Athlete Lawsuit Set to Proceed Following Grant of Electronic Arts’ Motion to Dismiss Certain Claims

2011

Cyberspace Lawyer The Ninth Circuit Weighs In On The Application of FACTA to Emailed Receipts and Offers Drafting Tips for Forum Selection Clauses

2011

IT Law Wiki Various articles

2010

Cyberspace Lawyer Setting Up a MySpace Page for Someone Else (Other Than Your Cat) Could Lead to Criminal Liability

2010

Cyberspace Lawyer No Claim for Data Breach Without Actual Harm

2010

Cyberspace Lawyer Service of Process by Email

2010

E-Commerce Law Report Clickwrap and Browse-Wrap FAQ

2010

Cyberspace Lawyer Blockowicz v. Williams

2010

Cyberspace Lawyer Missouri Court of Appeals Gives Guidance for the Enforcement of Browse-Wrap Agreements

2010

Cyberspace Lawyer Proof of Participating in the Creation of Defamatory Statements is Required to Defeat Immunity Under the Communications Decency Act

2010

Cyberspace Lawyer District Courrt Finds a Heightened Standard for Unmasking an Anonymous Non-Party Speaker

2010

Cyberspace Lawyer Sales on Ebay Do Not Lead to Personal Jurisdiction in the Buyer's State

2010

Cyberspace Lawyer Language Education Website eVisa is Found to Dilute the Visa Trademark

2010

Cyberspace Lawyer No Unauthorized Use of Name or Likeness Without a Showing of Produce or Service Promotion

2010

Cyberspace Lawyer AOL Denied Preliminary Injunction Against Allegedly Infringing Trademark Use Due to a Finding that its "Advertising.com" Mark is Generic

2010

Cyberspace Lawyer 9th Circuit Rules on Nominative Fair Use Defense as it Applies to Domain Names

2009

E-Commerce Law Report Gold Farming FAQ

2009

E-Commerce Law Report Taxation in Virtual Worlds

2009

Superhero Law Various articles

2009

Cyberspace Lawyer “Good Faith” is Too Soft, “Summary Judgment” is Too Hard, “Prima Facie” is Just Right

2009

Cyberspace Lawyer First Circuit Says Truth is a Defense to Defamation, but Only in Moderation

2009

Cyberspace Lawyer Fourth Circuit Says Statutory Damages Under the Stored Communications Act Are Reserved for Those That Are Actually Damaged

2009

Cyberspace Lawyer California Violent Video Game Act Is Running Out of Extra Lives

2009

Cyberspace Lawyer Real Rights of Publicity Give Way to First Amendment Rights in a Fantasy Game

2009

Cyberspace Lawyer Single Publication Rule Applies to Online Defamation

2009

Cyberspace Lawyer Lying When Signing Up for Online Service Not a Crime

2009

Cyberspace Lawyer Internet "Trash Talk" Can Still be Defamatory

2009

Cyberspace Lawyer Impeachment by Facebook Status Update?

2009

Cyberspace Lawyer Section 230 Applies to Statements of Union Members on Union Website

2009

Cyberspace Lawyer District Court Denies Blockbuster's Motion to Compel Arbitration Based on an Illusory Clause

2009

Cyberspace Lawyer New Jersey Blogger Denied Shield Law Protection and Liable for Damages Without Evidence of Actual Harm

2009

Cyberspace Lawyer Warrants for e-mail must meet the particularity requirement and affidavits must be attached to have any bearing on the legitimacy of the warrant

2009

Cyberspace Lawyer 9th Circuit Applies National Community Standards to Internet Speech

2009

Cyberspace Lawyer No Receipt Required for the Seizure of E-Mail

2007

E-Commerce Law Report Atlantic Recording v. XM Satellite Radio

N/A

Cyberspace Lawyer Wikipedia is Not a Source Whose Accuracy Cannot Be Reasonably Questioned

N/A

Cyberspace Lawyer Stick to Twitter on your Office Computer and Stay Out of Jail

N/A

Cyberspace Lawyer Yahoo Could Be Liable for an Unnecessary Promise to Remove Third-Party Content

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution