MavEryck Langford Stevenson

MavEryck Langford Stevenson

4.1
Rating: 8.8

Licensed for 9 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at Beverly Hills, CA
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, Landlord & Tenant, Family ... +2 more

468 N. Camden Dr. 2nd Floor, #221, Beverly Hills, CA

About MavEryck

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Criminal Defense 40%

10 years | 22 cases

40%
Landlord or Tenant 20%

10 years | 15 cases

20%
Divorce and Separation 15%

10 years | 10 cases

15%
Family 15%

10 years | 12 cases

15%
DUI and DWI 10%

10 years | 5 cases

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes

Hourly Rates

$ 175-350 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 9 years

State: California

Acquired: 2016

Active

No misconduct found

Location

MavEryck Langford Stevenson

468 N. Camden Dr. 2nd Floor, #221, Beverly Hills, CA, 90210

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

MavEryck Langford Stevenson's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.1 /5.0

13 Client Reviews

5 star (10)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (3)

Posted by Eileen | July 19, 2025 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Unprofessionals and lower level attorney

I hired Mr. Stevenson to file a Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment. While he was initially responsive, the billing was unclear and inconsistent with our signed agreement, which stated the $2,450 deposit covered 10 hours of service. When I respectfully asked for clarification, instead of answer...ing professionally, he wrote that I had “the audacity” to ask for a refund. I found that language deeply offensive and unacceptable. A lawyer should never shame a client for asking legitimate questions. Regardless of the case outcome, every client deserves clear communication and respect. I would not recommend this attorney based on my experience.

MavEryck Stevenson

Replied last July 21, 2025

(Edit) In an effort to provide the absolute best service to each client, I went back and reviewed this matter thoroughly from the beginning. I found there was a typo in the Fee Agreement that was sent to Ms. Lee, for her to signa and return to my attention. Although the agreement between myself and Ms. Lee was established through email that the fee covered the initial four hours of representation, as is standard on my Fee Agreements, the copy that was sent to her stated 10 hours. As soon as I discovered the error, I brought it to her attention and apologized for my part in the miscommunication. Unfortunately, Ms. Lee was not happy with the outcome at court, something that had absolutely nothing to do with the work I provided for her. According to the applicable law, Ms. Lee lost the case because she had failed to file necessary documents several weeks prior to hiring me. After the case was closed by the judge, I still continued my efforts to assist Ms. Lee by contacting Opposing Counsel. However, we were not able to reach an agreement through any additional negotiations. I informed Ms. Lee of this and the representation was concluded. Yes, of course every client deserves clear communication and respect. My use of the word "audacity" seemed appropriate to convey my reaction to a demand for a refund after the work was completed. To me it seemed that Ms. Lee simply wanted her money back because she lost her case, even though there was nothing any lawyer could have done differently to affect the outcome as it turned out the case had been lost because of not meeting a statutory deadline prior to the date I was hired for the representation. So yes, I was shocked to receive an email regarding a refund so long after the case was over. Once I discovered the source of the miscommunication between myself and Ms. Lee, I immediately apologized for the part I played in that miscommunication. There was nothing more that I could do other than apologize. It is very unfortunate that any client would let a negative review remain online, even after a miscommunication was discovered and the attorney apologized.

Posted by anonymous | July 16, 2025 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Be carefully

Be aware of this grifting attorney. Number one the communication is terrible he only communicate through email and he doesn’t even respond to every email you send him and if you do speak with him over the phone he will call you on a block number that I can personally contest too. Secondly most import...antly this attorney is not in the business of trying to help you, he only wants to exploit your situation so he can make a quick buck. On the complaint he filed on my behalf he exaggerated a lot of happened in my situation and when the defendants filed a cross complaint he dipped and left me hanging for dry. My situation was clearly a cash grab for the attorney and I should have paid attention to the red flags, there were plenty. Keep in mind he took my case without me really explaining to him what happened in my situation. Never once had a verbal conversation with him about what transparent and he never even looked at the evidence I sent him that’s why in the complaint that was filed there were dates that was wrong. It was just so unprofessional and not to mention him throwing me under the bus, lying on me and him threatening me to pay him 5k for the horrible, unprofessional services he provided to me. I paid him 2,000 for him to take on my case which I wish I could get back. Be carefully he’s a grifter

MavEryck Stevenson

Replied last July 17, 2025

It is very unfortunate that Mr. Johnson chose to log on and post a 1 star review that is completely untrue and without merit, in an attempt to hurt my professional reputation. This review is far from accurate. Documentation in my possession, and provided to Mr. Johnson, clearly shows that I worked on his case, free of charge, for over three months. Yes, Mr. Johnson paid a True Retainer of $2,000.00. And he understood that the True Retainer he paid in advance was not allocated to legal fees, but to take on his case because my law firm is in high demand as my track record shows that I win my cases 99% of the time. Over the next few months I performed work on Mr. Johnson's behalf without ever charging him one dime for my services. Mr. Johnson had many misunderstandings of the legal process. While it is true that the majority of communication with my office takes place by email, and that my cell number is blocked, there was extensive communication regarding the case. However, Mr. Johnson continued to use Google to look for answers that he believed contradicted the legal advice that I provided to him. I spent a lot of time showing Mr. Johnson that my advice was accurate and correct. In fact, each time Mr. Johnson discovered that I was right and that what he thought he found online was actually not relevant to his matter at all. Regarding the cross-complaint filed against Mr. Johnson, obviously neither of us anticipated that he would be sued by the Defendant, in a cross-complaint, for some very bad things Mr. Johnson allegedly did. However, the Fee Agreement clearly stated that it did not include any representation in defense of a cross-complaint and that any such defense would require a separate Fee Agreement. Although I was representing Mr. Johnson on a Contingency basis for his underlying lawsuit, Mr. Johnson could not afford the hourly rate required to defend against the cross-complaint. That left us in a situation where Mr. Johnson was attempting to defend himself in the cross-complaint; a task he was ill-prepared to handle on his own but he also could not afford to hire me to help him. Mr. Johnson was never presented with a bill for $5,000.00. The Invoice that Mr. Johnson received showed the total number of hours I worked on his matter. Although the total would have been approximately $5,000.00, each entry clearly showed "No Charge" next to it because the matter was on Contingency. Therefore, the total amount due for billable hours was $0. The only amount Mr. Johnson owed was $307.50 to cover the Costs of Service of Process for multiple defendants and a filing fee for a Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel. The Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel was only necessary because Mr. Johnson refused to sign a Substitution of Attorney form letting me off of his case after I determined that I could no longer represent him due to the breakdown in communication.

Posted by anonymous | March 30, 2022 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Great Lawyer

A good friend of mine recommended MavEryck to me, after I was hit on my motorcycle. I had 4 surgeries and missed over a year of work in total. MavEryck hit the ground running and was there every step of the way. This was my first time with a personal injury claim. He took the time to make sure I un...derstood things. He provided constant updates, checked in to see how I was doing and was available when I had questions or concerns. I was able to just concentrate on my recovery knowing MavEryck was there handling business. I am very happy with the terms of my settlement and am forever grateful to MavEryck Stevenson. He was a Light, in a somewhat dark time for me. I highly recommend.

Posted by anonymous | September 15, 2020 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Mr. Stevenson lost me my rent controlled house in Santa Monica though I am almost 75 years old and had lived there for 11 years.

I hired Stevenson because he was recommended to me by the LA County Bar referral service. I had been harassed by my landlord and her daughter for 10 years and they refused to fix anything, even when ordered to by the city in arbitration. They had been in violation of health and city codes for 3 years... without correction, which in Santa Monica is considered tenant harassment with fines attached. They illegally turned the garage into a rental TWICE while refusing to make repairs for their legal tenants and were cited and fined. They removed the hookups to my washer and dryer. They gave me multiple bogus 3 Day notices. They ordered me to get rid of my cat though I have a pet clause in my lease. They came into my house and private backyard without notice multiple times and gave me so many 24 hour notices, not in the proper time frame and not filled out as required, that I had a stack of them over an inch deep, while they never fixed anything. I had an 810 credit rating, plenty of money in my local bank, enough money in cash in the house to pay the rent and zero debt. I never missed a rent payment in my life. The postman did not pick up the mail for 4 or 5 days in a row, though that was the way I paid my rent every month. By the time I noticed, the rent was 3 days late and this was on a weekend. I immediately notified my landlord and her daughter by email that this was not intentional. I asked for her bank # so I could do a direct deposit to her account that day. My car was being repaired so I couldn't drive the rent to her and I have no smart phone for Uber. For two previous years they didn't cash my rent checks for 6 months and then cashed them all at once, so the rent being a few days late should not have burdened them. Instead they came the next day, Sunday, when I was home and posted a 3 day Notice on my door plus a demand for $153 in late fees, illegal per my lease. The rent envelope, clearly addressed, was still clipped to the mail slot adjacent to the door. The didn't take it, nor knock or ring the bell. They would not answer the phone. The phone numbers on the Notice and the late fee demand were different from each other and not phone numbers known to me. I called repeatedly. I emailed repeatedly. No response. 4 times over the previous 2 years the daughter had threatened me in emails trying to get me to move, saying her mother was going to move into my house (a lie), and used fighting words in person. In SM it is illegal for the landlord to even discuss this if they haven't filled out the forms with both rent control and the city attorney and put the relocation fee in trust. They never did this, and the last threatening email I'd received was just a few days before they posted my door. Then, though I handed the rent to the (new) mailman and he made sure it went out that night in plenty of time to satisfy, they claimed they never received it and sued me for eviction. I never received the envelope back in the mail. This was a slam dunk case of retaliatory eviction and a set up. I finally got their bank # from my co-tenant and deposited the rent. They put the money back in my account and closed their account. Mr. Stevenson had me deposit $1000 in his trust account and sign a contract. He told me we would completely discuss the case later and paralegals would go over the case with me if he was not available. NEVER happened. I sent him some of the emails I'd received from the landlord but none of the other supporting documents. He never met with me. He said he was out of town. When I sent him an email saying I was very nervous that he was unprepared and asked if he needed the other proof of retaliation and harassment he said no, that the judge wouldn't look at it. He was 1/2 an hour late to court and unprepared. He did not meet with me during lunch,never protested or cited SM law, mounted NO defense. I had been sick and was confused. I was not allowed to speak for myself. The State Bar Court has advised me to file against him.

MavEryck Stevenson

Replied last January 25, 2021

We're sorry you had a bad experience with our firm. This matter does not sound familiar, and we strive for the utmost client satisfaction in every case. Please contact me directly to discuss your specific concerns.

Posted by Ty | February 27, 2018 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Gets the job done

MavEryck is a wonderful lawyer. He’s very patient and fair. He took the time to explain the pro’s and con’s of what I would be facing. MavEryck is very thorough and pays attention to every detail. He settled my case out of court, making it so I did not have to attend (what could’ve been) several upco...ming court dates. I recommend him if your looking for a great lawyer.

See All Client Reviews

MavEryck Langford Stevenson's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse MavEryck
Joseph W. Kellener headshot
Joseph Kellener

Business lawyer | Mar 05

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I endorse this lawyer."

Georgia Anderson headshot
Georgia Anderson

Unknown lawyer | Mar 08

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I recommend MavEryck without reservation as he is an excellent attorney who truly cares about his work. He is an ethical and experienced attorney and I hold a high respect for him. His dedication to his clients is his number one priority."

Sara Olivia Van Valkenburg headshot
Sara Van Valkenburg

Criminal defense lawyer | Feb 05

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"MavEryck has an assured presence that is a terrific asset in the courtroom and when negotiating for clients. His can-do approach to complicated issues make him a stand out attorney."

Teresa Gutierrez headshot
Teresa Gutierrez

Unknown lawyer | Dec 29

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"MavEryck works very hard for his clients. A strong advocate indeed!"

Sharon O'Brien Eldredge headshot
Sharon Eldredge

Criminal defense lawyer | Oct 10

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"MavEryck is a conscientious advocate for his clients and is someone I enjoy working with."

Nidya P Aldana Paredes headshot
Nidya Paredes

Unknown lawyer | Apr 17

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. MavEryck is a determined and professional advocate. His extensive work experience provides a wealth of resources and knowledge."

Iman Jaffrey headshot
Iman Jaffrey

General practice lawyer | Feb 16

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Maria Elizabeth Hall headshot
Maria Hall

Landlord or tenant lawyer | Feb 07

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"MavEryck has a strong, calming presence even during times of crisis. His clients are lucky to have a lawyer who is so doggedly determined to get the best possible outcome for them."

Cyrus S. Whittaker headshot
Cyrus Whittaker

Family lawyer | Jan 29

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"MavEryck is professional, prompt, and passionate. I endorse him and feel confident that he will provide his clients with top quality work product."

Mark Samuel Oknyansky headshot
Mark Oknyansky

Unknown lawyer | Dec 27

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

View All Endorsements
Georgia Anderson headshot
Georgia Anderson

Unknown lawyer

Matthew Mitchell Einhorn headshot
Matthew Einhorn

Estate planning lawyer

Teresa Gutierrez headshot
Teresa Gutierrez

Estate planning lawyer

Iman Jaffrey headshot
Iman Jaffrey

Criminal defense lawyer

Sara Olivia Van Valkenburg headshot
Sara Van Valkenburg

Intellectual property lawyer

Nidya P Aldana Paredes headshot
Nidya Paredes

Education lawyer

Maria Elizabeth Hall headshot
Maria Hall

Litigation lawyer

Cyrus S. Whittaker headshot
Cyrus Whittaker

Personal injury lawyer

William Andrew Brown Jr headshot
William Brown

Debt collection lawyer

Donna Person Smith headshot
Donna Smith

Criminal defense lawyer

Mark Samuel Oknyansky headshot
Mark Oknyansky

Personal injury lawyer

Anna Maria Mcdonald Ambrose headshot
Anna Ambrose

Criminal defense lawyer

Sharon O'Brien Eldredge headshot
Sharon Eldredge

Commercial real estate lawyer

Kenneth Christopher Cheney headshot
Kenneth Cheney

Intellectual property lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.8 (Excellent)

Honors

2017

Solo Practitioner of the Month, Attorney at Law Magazine

2016

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Black Women Lawyers of Los Angeles

2012

CA Bar Association Scholarship, Manatt

Work Experience

2016 - Present

Attorney, The Law Offices of MavEryck Langford Stevenson, Esq.

2016 - 2016

Law Clerk, Silver & Wiright, LLP

2016 - 2016

Legal Extern, Newport Beach City Attorney's Office

2014 - 2014

Juducial Assistant Trainee, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles

2010 - 2014

EPR/DVOP, State Of California

Associations

2017 - Present

Los Angeles County Bar Association

Member

2012 - Present

American Bar Association chapter

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Stevenson v. American Suzuki

Judgement for Plaintiff Stevenson

See More Legal Cases

Education

2016

Loyola Law School, Loyola Marymount University

JD - Juris Doctor

2015

Santa Clara University School of Law

Study Abroad - Munich, Germany

2012

California State University, Fullerton

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2017

Legal Presentation

General issues in the law and what to expect when hiring an attorney.

Publications

2015

Los Angeles Public Interest Law Journal Los Angeles Public Interest Law Journal

Languages

English

German

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution