Free Consultation
$0 first 30 minutes
"Solo Practitioner of the Month July 2017 (Attorney at Law Magazine Downtown Los Angeles Edition)
Featured on the website for Loyola Law School 2017
I do my best to treat your legal issues as if they were my own. I solve all legal problems (Contracts, Corporate, Criminal Defense, Divorce, DUI, Wills, Etc.)
Trust me to develop a strategy to accomplish the goals for your desired outcome.
"I do it all and I do it well." ~ MavEryck
5
Practice Areas
10 years | 22 cases
10 years | 15 cases
10 years | 10 cases
10 years | 12 cases
Free Consultation
$0 first 30 minutes
$ 175-350 per hour
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: California
Acquired: 2016
No misconduct found
468 N. Camden Dr. 2nd Floor, #221, Beverly Hills, CA, 90210
Showing 1 - 5 of 13 client reviews from Avvo
Posted by Eileen | July 19, 2025 | Hired Attorney
I hired Mr. Stevenson to file a Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment. While he was initially responsive, the billing was unclear and inconsistent with our signed agreement, which stated the $2,450 deposit covered 10 hours of service. When I respectfully asked for clarification, instead of answer...
(Edit) In an effort to provide the absolute best service to each client, I went back and reviewed this matter thoroughly from the beginning. I found there was a typo in the Fee Agreement that was sent to Ms. Lee, for her to signa and return to my attention. Although the agreement between myself and Ms. Lee was established through email that the fee covered the initial four hours of representation, as is standard on my Fee Agreements, the copy that was sent to her stated 10 hours. As soon as I discovered the error, I brought it to her attention and apologized for my part in the miscommunication. Unfortunately, Ms. Lee was not happy with the outcome at court, something that had absolutely nothing to do with the work I provided for her. According to the applicable law, Ms. Lee lost the case because she had failed to file necessary documents several weeks prior to hiring me. After the case was closed by the judge, I still continued my efforts to assist Ms. Lee by contacting Opposing Counsel. However, we were not able to reach an agreement through any additional negotiations. I informed Ms. Lee of this and the representation was concluded. Yes, of course every client deserves clear communication and respect. My use of the word "audacity" seemed appropriate to convey my reaction to a demand for a refund after the work was completed. To me it seemed that Ms. Lee simply wanted her money back because she lost her case, even though there was nothing any lawyer could have done differently to affect the outcome as it turned out the case had been lost because of not meeting a statutory deadline prior to the date I was hired for the representation. So yes, I was shocked to receive an email regarding a refund so long after the case was over. Once I discovered the source of the miscommunication between myself and Ms. Lee, I immediately apologized for the part I played in that miscommunication. There was nothing more that I could do other than apologize. It is very unfortunate that any client would let a negative review remain online, even after a miscommunication was discovered and the attorney apologized.
Posted by anonymous | July 16, 2025 | Hired Attorney
Be aware of this grifting attorney. Number one the communication is terrible he only communicate through email and he doesn’t even respond to every email you send him and if you do speak with him over the phone he will call you on a block number that I can personally contest too. Secondly most import...
It is very unfortunate that Mr. Johnson chose to log on and post a 1 star review that is completely untrue and without merit, in an attempt to hurt my professional reputation. This review is far from accurate. Documentation in my possession, and provided to Mr. Johnson, clearly shows that I worked on his case, free of charge, for over three months. Yes, Mr. Johnson paid a True Retainer of $2,000.00. And he understood that the True Retainer he paid in advance was not allocated to legal fees, but to take on his case because my law firm is in high demand as my track record shows that I win my cases 99% of the time. Over the next few months I performed work on Mr. Johnson's behalf without ever charging him one dime for my services. Mr. Johnson had many misunderstandings of the legal process. While it is true that the majority of communication with my office takes place by email, and that my cell number is blocked, there was extensive communication regarding the case. However, Mr. Johnson continued to use Google to look for answers that he believed contradicted the legal advice that I provided to him. I spent a lot of time showing Mr. Johnson that my advice was accurate and correct. In fact, each time Mr. Johnson discovered that I was right and that what he thought he found online was actually not relevant to his matter at all. Regarding the cross-complaint filed against Mr. Johnson, obviously neither of us anticipated that he would be sued by the Defendant, in a cross-complaint, for some very bad things Mr. Johnson allegedly did. However, the Fee Agreement clearly stated that it did not include any representation in defense of a cross-complaint and that any such defense would require a separate Fee Agreement. Although I was representing Mr. Johnson on a Contingency basis for his underlying lawsuit, Mr. Johnson could not afford the hourly rate required to defend against the cross-complaint. That left us in a situation where Mr. Johnson was attempting to defend himself in the cross-complaint; a task he was ill-prepared to handle on his own but he also could not afford to hire me to help him. Mr. Johnson was never presented with a bill for $5,000.00. The Invoice that Mr. Johnson received showed the total number of hours I worked on his matter. Although the total would have been approximately $5,000.00, each entry clearly showed "No Charge" next to it because the matter was on Contingency. Therefore, the total amount due for billable hours was $0. The only amount Mr. Johnson owed was $307.50 to cover the Costs of Service of Process for multiple defendants and a filing fee for a Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel. The Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel was only necessary because Mr. Johnson refused to sign a Substitution of Attorney form letting me off of his case after I determined that I could no longer represent him due to the breakdown in communication.
Posted by anonymous | March 30, 2022 | Hired Attorney
A good friend of mine recommended MavEryck to me, after I was hit on my motorcycle. I had 4 surgeries and missed over a year of work in total. MavEryck hit the ground running and was there every step of the way. This was my first time with a personal injury claim. He took the time to make sure I un...
Posted by anonymous | September 15, 2020 | Hired Attorney
I hired Stevenson because he was recommended to me by the LA County Bar referral service. I had been harassed by my landlord and her daughter for 10 years and they refused to fix anything, even when ordered to by the city in arbitration. They had been in violation of health and city codes for 3 years...
We're sorry you had a bad experience with our firm. This matter does not sound familiar, and we strive for the utmost client satisfaction in every case. Please contact me directly to discuss your specific concerns.
Posted by Ty | February 27, 2018 | Hired Attorney
MavEryck is a wonderful lawyer. He’s very patient and fair. He took the time to explain the pro’s and con’s of what I would be facing. MavEryck is very thorough and pays attention to every detail. He settled my case out of court, making it so I did not have to attend (what could’ve been) several upco...
"I recommend MavEryck without reservation as he is an excellent attorney who truly cares about his work. He is an ethical and experienced attorney and I hold a high respect for him. His dedication to his clients is his number one priority."
"MavEryck has an assured presence that is a terrific asset in the courtroom and when negotiating for clients. His can-do approach to complicated issues make him a stand out attorney."
"I endorse this lawyer. MavEryck is a determined and professional advocate. His extensive work experience provides a wealth of resources and knowledge."
"MavEryck has a strong, calming presence even during times of crisis. His clients are lucky to have a lawyer who is so doggedly determined to get the best possible outcome for them."
"MavEryck is professional, prompt, and passionate. I endorse him and feel confident that he will provide his clients with top quality work product."
Unknown lawyer
Estate planning lawyer
Estate planning lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Intellectual property lawyer
Education lawyer
Litigation lawyer
Personal injury lawyer
Debt collection lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Personal injury lawyer
Criminal defense lawyer
Commercial real estate lawyer
Intellectual property lawyer
2017
Solo Practitioner of the Month, Attorney at Law Magazine
2016
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Black Women Lawyers of Los Angeles
2012
CA Bar Association Scholarship, Manatt
2016 - Present
Attorney, The Law Offices of MavEryck Langford Stevenson, Esq.
2016 - 2016
Law Clerk, Silver & Wiright, LLP
2016 - 2016
Legal Extern, Newport Beach City Attorney's Office
2014 - 2014
Juducial Assistant Trainee, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
2010 - 2014
EPR/DVOP, State Of California
2017 - Present
Los Angeles County Bar AssociationMember
2012 - Present
American Bar Association chapterMember
Judgement for Plaintiff Stevenson
2016
JD - Juris Doctor
2015
Study Abroad - Munich, Germany
2012
BA - Bachelor of Arts
2017
General issues in the law and what to expect when hiring an attorney.
2015
English
German
Legal Answers
Can a father seek to change existing child custody orders if he and wife are currently reconciled and back together?
07 Mar 2020
The court put a restraining order on my boyfriend what can I do to get the order dismissed?
07 Mar 2020
What are the landlord/tenant rights in Los Angeles, CA if a new tenant received keys and made payment but not signed lease?
02 Mar 2020