David B. Sandelands

David B. Sandelands

5.0
Rating: 8.9

Licensed for 27 years

Patent application Lawyer at Los Angeles, CA
Practice Areas: Patent Application, Patent Infringement, Intellectual Property ... +2 more

12100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1700, Los Angeles, CA

About David

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Patent Application 30%

Patent procurement in a variety of fields including mechanical and electro-mechanical products, medical devices, industrial lighting, aerospace and automotive components, and business methods.

28 years

30%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Texas for 13 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 2012

Eligible to Practice in Texas

No misconduct found

Licensed in California for 27 years

State: California

Acquired: 1998

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Cislo & Thomas LLP

12100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1700, Los Angeles, CA, 90025

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

David B. Sandelands's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

2 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (2) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 2
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0
Practice Areas
What Clients Mention

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Intellectual Property

Posted by Demian | October 24, 2012 | Intellectual Property

Excellent patent attorney

David Sandelands has been instrumental in working with our company to build our patent portfolio. He has worked one-on-one with our engineers and in-house counsel to devise an intellectual property protection strategy for our inventions. We have retained Dave for all of our patent work for the past t...wo years. We strongly recommend.

See All Client Reviews

David B. Sandelands's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse David
John Kenneth Fitzgerald headshot
John Fitzgerald

Patent application lawyer | Feb 09

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Dave is a skilled patent drafter and prosecutor."

Peter Veregge headshot
Peter Veregge

Intellectual property lawyer | Feb 05

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Having worked with David on a number of matters, he is very diligent, honest, and gets results."

Philip Thomas Virga headshot
Philip Virga

Intellectual property lawyer | Feb 04

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"David, did outstanding work on an infringement opinion"

Ronald Ethan Perez headshot
Ronald Perez

Intellectual property lawyer | Nov 22

Relationship: Supervised lawyer

"David has a strong background in patent prosecution and litigation. I enjoyed working with him, as he is a friendly and collegiate person in addition to a professional and skilled patent attorney."

Jeffrey Lewis headshot
Jeffrey Lewis

Intellectual property lawyer | Nov 22

Relationship: Supervised lawyer

"I worked with David for many years and observed his expertise with intellectual property litigation. David is ethical and knowledgeable. I would not hesitate to consult with or refer to him any matter involving intellectual property in general or patents specifically. David is a top notice patent attorney."

View All Endorsements
John Kenneth Fitzgerald headshot
John Fitzgerald

Patent application lawyer

Peter Veregge headshot
Peter Veregge

Litigation lawyer

Philip Thomas Virga headshot
Philip Virga

Intellectual property lawyer

Jeffrey Lewis headshot
Jeffrey Lewis

Litigation lawyer

Ronald Ethan Perez headshot
Ronald Perez

Intellectual property lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.9 (Excellent)

Honors

1994

Excellent Performance of Space Station Structural Analysis, McDonnell Douglas Corporation

Work Experience

2004 - Present

Partner, Cislo & Thomas, LLP

2002 - 2004

Attorney, Enterprise Counsel Group, Alc

2000 - 2001

Attorney, Christie Parker & Hale, LLP

1998 - 2000

Attorney, Fulwider Patton, LLP

1997 - 1997

Extern to Magistrate Judge Maria Elena James, United States District Court For The Northern District Of California

1988 - 1995

Principal Aerospace Engineer, McDonnell Douglas Space Systems Company

1983 - 1987

Lead Aerospace Engineer, Hughes Aircraft Company

Associations

2012 - Present

Los Angeles Superior Court

Volunteer Dispute Resolution Officer

2009 - Present

West Los Angeles Inn of Court

Member

2000 - Present

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Registered Attorney

1998 - Present

Los Angeles County Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Boris v. Denenberg

Successfully represented Plaintiff

Zoo Med Labs v. Topiary Art Works

Successfully represented Defendant

US Lighting Tech, v. Deco Lighting, Inc.

Successfully represented Plaintiff

All Cities Realty v. Hollymax Realty, INc.

Successfully represented Defendant

All Cities Realty v. CF Real Estate Loans

Successfully represented Defendant

Cirtran v. International Edge

Successfully represented Defendant

NZG Specialities v. Gutierrez

Successfully represented Defendant

Sensitech v. Time 'N Temperature

Won on appeal

Attorney of Record on Approximately 40 Federal and State Cases

See More Legal Cases

Education

1998

University of California, Hastings College of the Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1982

Michigan State University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Publications

2014

Los Angeles Daily Journal High Court Resovles Lanham Act Circuit Split

2014

Los Angeles Daily Journal Reining in Patent Trolls, State by State

2014

San Francisco Daily Journal High Court Resovles Lanham Act Circuit Split

2014

San Francisco Daily Journal Reining in Patent Trolls, State by State

2013

Los Angeles Daily Journal Law Still Fuzzy on Patentability of Business Methods

2013

Los Angeles Daily Journal Commercial Skipping

2013

San Francisco Daily Journal Law Still Fuzzy on Patentability of Business Methods

2013

San Francisco Daily Journal Commercial Skipping

2011

Lighting Industry Journal US Ligthing Tech and Deco Settle Lawsuit

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution