John Kenneth Fitzgerald

John Kenneth Fitzgerald

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 8.8

Licensed for 32 years

Patent application Lawyer at Santa Ana, DC
Practice Areas: Patent Application, Patent Infringement, Trademark Application ... +2 more

13051 Prospect Ave, Santa Ana, DC

About John

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Patent Application 50%

All areas of patent drafting and prosecution, including arguing before Board of Appeal

33 years | 1,000 cases

50%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 60 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 32 years

State: California

Acquired: 1993

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Fitzgerald IP Law

13051 Prospect Ave, Santa Ana, DC, 92705

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

John Kenneth Fitzgerald's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

John Kenneth Fitzgerald's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse John
David B. Sandelands headshot
David Sandelands

Patent application lawyer | Feb 09

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. John is a skilled patent attorney who gets results for his clients."

View All Endorsements
David B. Sandelands headshot
David Sandelands

Patent application lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.8 (Excellent)

Honors

2009

Southern California Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2008

Southern California Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2008

Super Lawyer-Corporate Counsel, Super Lawyers

2007

Southern California Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2006

Southern California Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2005

Souther California Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2005

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

2014 - Present

Senior Counsel, Rutan & Tucker

2010 - Present

Adjunct Professor, Whittier Law School

1993 - 2014

Partner, Fulwider Patton LLP

1985 - 1993

Director, World Wide Clinical Research, IOLAB, Johnson & Johnson

1973 - 1985

Tech Service & Development Specialist, Dow Corning Corporation

Associations

2009 - Present

California BBQ Association

Member

2008 - Present

Orange County Patent Law Association, Federal Courts Committee

Member

1995 - Present

Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association

Member

1995 - Present

State Bar of California, Intellectual Property Law Section, Copyright Law Standing Committee

Member

1993 - Present

State Bar of California

Member

1993 - Present

Los Angeles County Bar Association

Member

1993 - Present

American Intellectual Property Law Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

International E-Z Up, Inc. v. Caravan et al.

Settled in favor of Plaintiff

Carter V. World Famous Sports, Inc.

Consent Judgment in favor of Plaintiff

Carter v. Variflex, Inc.

Settled

Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. & Guidant Corp.

Directed Verdict in favor of Defendant

Rosendahl v. Utter et al.

Settled

KD Kanopy, Inc. v. International E-Z Up, Inc.

Settled

Digital Instruments, Inc. v. Topmetrix, Inc.

Settled

Martim Group, Inc. v. Royal Pet, Inc.

Dismissed in favor of Defendant

See More Legal Cases

Education

1993

Whittier College School of Law, Los Angeles, California

JD - Juris Doctor

1981

Central Michigan University

M.B.A

1972

DePaul University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Publications

N/A

U.S. Patent Silicone Resin Optical Devices

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution