Paul Michael Bowron

Unfortunately, this attorney made my case significantly more difficult. In my domestic violence matter, he frequently appeared to side with the opposing party, taking rigid positions that overlooked the abuse and power imbalance I experienced—even though my ex-husband had retained a top criminal at...torney. For example, he argued that a car, which had been gifted to me by my ex-husband, actually belonged to him because my ex had originally purchased it with his own money, without fully considering the broader context. He also insisted that parental time must be granted to my ex-husband regardless of the domestic violence issues in the case. Additionally, at the opposing party’s request, he loaned a health-related device that I needed for medical reasons, as my ex-husband’s father was ill. Although Mr. Borrown promised the device would be returned, no written agreement was made, and the opposing party later claimed it as their own—it was never recovered. His representation caused lasting challenges, creating a negative baseline that later counsel tried to correct, but it was too late to fully resolve. My ex-husband misrepresented his assets, and although the opposing attorney was later suspended for submitting false evidence, the court was persuaded that my ex earned minimal income, resulting in only $100 in child support, despite his actual ownership of multiple properties and a business. I hired him through a program for affordable legal services. While the service was not free and not fully affordable, the level of representation did not meet the needs of a case of this seriousness. I decided to terminate his services before further complications arose. Caution: Based on my experience, this attorney’s approach in my case often aligned with the perspective of the opposing party, which may result in your interests being overlooked, especially in domestic violence matters.