Diana I Rader

Diana I Rader

3.3
Rating: 6.0

Licensed for 25 years

Family Lawyer at Phoenix, AZ
Practice Areas: Family, Litigation

11260 N Tatum Blvd, Suite 143, Phoenix, AZ

About Diana

Biography

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Family 90%

16 years

90%
Litigation 10%

16 years

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 315-325 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Arizona for 25 years

State: Arizona

Acquired: 2000

Active

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2021

Location

Rader Law Firm

11260 N Tatum Blvd, Suite 143, Phoenix, AZ, 85028

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Diana I Rader's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.3 /5.0

14 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (14) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Punctuality

Posted by anonymous | January 02, 2019 | Hired Attorney | Family

Terrible

I retained Diana Rader and her office to handle a family law matter. In my initial consultation, Diana was on time and appeared competent and I decided to pay her a retainer of several thousand Dollars. Frankly, that was the last time Diana was either competent, professional or responsive. As a ...former attorney, I found her performance to be completely unacceptable for the following reasons: -She rarely, if ever, responded to my emails or telephone calls -In speaking with her about case strategy or discovery, I needed to suggest what needed to be done next because it was very apparent that Diana had done little or no review of my file. In turn, I was forced to prepare all discovery requests and responses. In sending my response to opposing counsel, Diana failed to submit a response signed by me which, along with Diana’s non-responsiveness, violated Arizona Family Law Rules and caused opposing counsel to request a deposition, further adding legal expenses to both sides. I took the deposition of the opposing party and had defended my own deposition. -Even though I asked her to represent me, Diana tasked an inexperienced first-year associate with handling my case. Even though I requested that associate to be removed from the case after several glaring mistakes, she refused. Diana appeared to do next to nothing in this case. To the contrary, she constantly missed deadlines for the filing of discovery responses which resulted in an order for the payment of legal fees to be entered against me. -Even though Diana was contacted by counsel to discuss settlement, Diana failed to adequately convey opposing counsel’s willingness to settle the matter. It should be noted that the case settled shortly after Diana effectively withdrew from the case. -To add insult to injury, despite the fact that Diana had done very little substantive work and required me to prepare the substance of all discovery requests, discovery responses and all essential case strategy, she requested payment of additional legal fees in excess of $3000 approximately one week before trial even though she knew I had no money and I needed her for the trial. When I told her I could not pay the legal fees at this time but would be willing to pay them later, Diana immediately filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel less than 5 days prior to trial. Thankfully, opposing counsel was extremely professional and we were able to settle the case on the eve of trial. It was clear that a settlement could have been reached much sooner but for Diana’s lack of responsiveness to opposing counsel’s attempt to reach her. In my professional opinion as an attorney, I believe that Diana Rader should be avoided at all costs. In my career as an attorney, I have never encountered a more incompetent and unresponsive attorney. If you do not believe me, please contact me. I also believe that if I had not been an attorney who understood that she was mishandling this matter, this case would have ended very badly for me.

See All Client Reviews

Diana I Rader's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Diana
Ann Teresa Palmer headshot
Ann Palmer

Family lawyer | Mar 09

Relationship: Worked for lawyer

"Diana gets results. The judges apparently love her, and it seems she is able to convince them of just about anything. For that reason alone, I would recommend her."

Kristi Michelle Morley headshot
Kristi Morley

Family lawyer | Aug 29

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Robert C Howard Jr headshot
Robert Howard

Family lawyer | Jun 20

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

View All Endorsements
Michelle J. Perkins headshot
Michelle Perkins

Divorce and separation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  6.0 (Good)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2021.

Admonition and Probation issued in AZ, 2021

updated on 06/02/2022

An admonishment means the attorney did something wrong but may still practice law. While on probation, the State monitors the attorney's activities for a period of time in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior.

Work Experience

2011 - Present

Partner/Owner, Rader Lucero PLLC

2005 - 2011

Shareholder/Partner, Sacks Tierney PA

Associations

2009 - 2010

Scottsdale Bar Association

President

Education

2000

Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1997

Arizona State University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Languages

Spanish

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2021
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution