Mark Ellis Biddison

In October of 2015, I retained the services of Mark Biddison to represent me as a victim in a motorcycle-vehicle collision. Because this accident was work related and involved four separate insured interests, I expected resolution of this claim to be expensive, messy, and time consuming. In t...he course of only fourteen months, Mark negotiated fair and equitable settlements with all parties against whom I had claims. While not being privy to the actual discussions directly, I can attest to the seriousness with which insurers regarded Mark’s presentation of my case. It was very clear that opposing parties knew that my claim was presented by Mark without ‘puffing’, exaggerated antics, or overreaching demands. Mark spoke — they listened. Mark Biddison is a credit to his profession. I cannot recommend the services of Mark and his staff highly enough.

Although I feel I got screwed and am having a very hard time getting used to my new life being crimpled. I like my attorney. None of this is his fault. I meet him a few days after the accident in the hospital. From then on he has always been available for me. He definitely kept me up to date, and was... very straight forward even with the bad news.

From Michael Brownewell, the inventor of a pending and published patented process that enables 3rd Party Certification of court admissible electronic evidence and/or the electronic original, its protection, storage, access and its universal use in litigation and/or inspection. Mark Biddison is m...y main legal consultant and I do nothing without his approval with regards to my process that enables 3rd Party Certification of court admissibility of electronic evidence following FRE902(11) and the corresponding State Rules of Evidence and/or 3rd Party Certification of the electronic original following the same requirements and: • data collection via live-at-the-site SmartPhone/cell phone/surveillance technology, • data collection via live-from-the-desktop scanner enabling paper converted to electronic data, • data collection via recorded video conference calls and the referenced certified documents, • data certification by a 3rd (Disinterested) Party of the data and metadata enabling the court admissibility and/or originality of electronic data following the same requirement, • non-accessible offsite redundant storage of the data to eliminate spoliation, corruption, overwriting, etc. • data safekeeping as the agent of the client and their attorney for all certified data in offsite storage, • elimination of overly aggressive subpoena powers of the client’s hard drive, • legally and physically protected real-time multiparty access to a certified copy of the data including all proprietary data of the client in a separate data vault from the original eliminating redundancy, • hardware configuration that redundantly protects the data and the data in litigation hold, controls the access to the certified copies of the data and its lifecycle management including destruction, • software requirements that collects and routes the data enabling certified send to, certified receipt from, identification, indexing, storage and its certification, • drafting of the client’s engagement agreement that enables its use and legal protection, • review and drafting of the client’s contracts enabling offsetting insurance requirements, additional insureds, the required insurance coverage, etc. including the use and legal protection of SmartPhone technology combined with the supporting documents, • use of the data in litigation under attorney-client privilege or as admissible electronic evidence supporting subrogation from the plaintiff’s or defense position, • assessment of the damages and settlement prior to presentation in court, • finely, the representation of the client in a court proceeding with our certified electronic evidence and its requirements following the Business Records Rule. His support in the concept development and in providing a legal explanation of its value and usability positions Mark, as one of the top attorneys in the United States with regards to the above. We are in the final development of our process and introduction to the public, which has been under his legal guidance since inception of our intellectual property and its integration into the consumer, business and governmental applications. Michael, CEO Secured Evidence Systems