Mark Ellis Biddison

Mark carefully assessed my case in the beginning and patiently pursued a settlement that was much higher than I ever imagined we could reach. As an attorney myself, I greatly appreciated Mark's communication, professionalism and depth of experience in negotiating with insurance companies. I would ...highly recommend Mark to anyone who has been injured in a car accident and is not sure how to proceed in order to receive a full and just recovery.

I Hired Mark at the time of the Consultation. He was honest informative, forthwright , interested ,knowledgeable,considerate and compassionate. His attention to detail and ability to follow through was amazing, Mark demonstrated great integrity,dedication, and desire to adhere to a specific timeline... throughout the process. He was steadfast about accumulating the necessary data and submitting it to the insurance Co. He was in constant communication with me as was his staff. I was never left in the dark about anything;they were always there for me should I have a question. Our case was not very easy since the opposing party took the position that we had no case. I was awed by Mark's immediate response quoting from his head two separate cases and Colorado Statutes derived from these cases to show that their position was inaccurate, Within minutes he had the cases in front of him ; told them to reference these cases. I was Amazed and Impressed! At that point they went home to regroup. Mark and his team had done their homework. We did better in the end than anticipated. The entire process was completed with the least amount of stress, was financially satisfactory, and Mark went beyond expectation to insure that I was satisfied with his total work accomplished, This was a Five Star Performance in Every Respect. I am overly satisfied in every respect and continue to recommend Mark to others.

From Michael Brownewell, the inventor of a pending and published patented process that enables 3rd Party Certification of court admissible electronic evidence and/or the electronic original, its protection, storage, access and its universal use in litigation and/or inspection. Mark Biddison is m...y main legal consultant and I do nothing without his approval with regards to my process that enables 3rd Party Certification of court admissibility of electronic evidence following FRE902(11) and the corresponding State Rules of Evidence and/or 3rd Party Certification of the electronic original following the same requirements and: • data collection via live-at-the-site SmartPhone/cell phone/surveillance technology, • data collection via live-from-the-desktop scanner enabling paper converted to electronic data, • data collection via recorded video conference calls and the referenced certified documents, • data certification by a 3rd (Disinterested) Party of the data and metadata enabling the court admissibility and/or originality of electronic data following the same requirement, • non-accessible offsite redundant storage of the data to eliminate spoliation, corruption, overwriting, etc. • data safekeeping as the agent of the client and their attorney for all certified data in offsite storage, • elimination of overly aggressive subpoena powers of the client’s hard drive, • legally and physically protected real-time multiparty access to a certified copy of the data including all proprietary data of the client in a separate data vault from the original eliminating redundancy, • hardware configuration that redundantly protects the data and the data in litigation hold, controls the access to the certified copies of the data and its lifecycle management including destruction, • software requirements that collects and routes the data enabling certified send to, certified receipt from, identification, indexing, storage and its certification, • drafting of the client’s engagement agreement that enables its use and legal protection, • review and drafting of the client’s contracts enabling offsetting insurance requirements, additional insureds, the required insurance coverage, etc. including the use and legal protection of SmartPhone technology combined with the supporting documents, • use of the data in litigation under attorney-client privilege or as admissible electronic evidence supporting subrogation from the plaintiff’s or defense position, • assessment of the damages and settlement prior to presentation in court, • finely, the representation of the client in a court proceeding with our certified electronic evidence and its requirements following the Business Records Rule. His support in the concept development and in providing a legal explanation of its value and usability positions Mark, as one of the top attorneys in the United States with regards to the above. We are in the final development of our process and introduction to the public, which has been under his legal guidance since inception of our intellectual property and its integration into the consumer, business and governmental applications. Michael, CEO Secured Evidence Systems