We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Aaron David Radbil
About Aaron
Biography
Mr. Radbil has extensive experience litigating individual cases and class actions filed under federal and state consumer protection statutes. He has negotiated settlements on behalf of millions of class members. He has successfully tried cases to verdict in federal and state courts across the country. And he has briefed and argued issues of significant consumer interest before courts of appeals spanning the nation.
Practice Areas
4
Practice Areas
Fees and Rates
Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.
Search our directory
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withLicenses
Licensed in Texas for 11 years
State: Texas
Acquired: 2015
No misconduct found
Licensed in Florida for 18 years
State: Florida
Acquired: 2007
No misconduct found
Licensed in Illinois for 19 years
State: Illinois
Acquired: 2006
No misconduct found
Location
Law Offices of Aaron David Radbil
106 East Sixth Street, Suite 913, Austin, TX, 78701
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
Aaron David Radbil's Reviews
Avvo Review Score
4 Client Reviews
Filter Avvo Reviews (4)
Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Practice Areas
Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Defective and Dangerous Products
Posted by Bob | March 10, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Defective and Dangerous Products
Recommendation for Attorney Aaron Radbil
I am pleased to endorse Aaron Radbil as an exceptional attorney and plaintiff’s advocate for Class Action and Products Liability suits. For the last 2 years Aaron and his associated attorneys have represented me in a complicated Class Action Suit that involves a unique combination of medical issue...
Aaron David Radbil's Lawyer Endorsements
"Mr. Radbil is an excellent consumer protection and class action litigation attorney. His efforts to provide relief for clients and class members from abusive debt collection practices, annoying and nuisance inducing robocalls, and other consumer protection matters is nothing short of exemplary. I endorse this lawyer."
"Mr. Radbil is an outstanding attorney with a strong command of the legal areas in which he practices. I would highly recommend him to any prospective client."
"Aaron is a tremendous lawyer. He is hard working, intelligent and detail oriented. He has achieved tremendous results for his clients and I have every confidence that he will continue to be extremely successful for his clients in the future."
"I endorse this lawyer."
"Aaron is an exceptional attorney. He is industrious, intelligent and creative, and is at the very top of his chosen area of practice. My highest recommendation for a colleague."
"I endorse this lawyer."
"Aaron is a highly skilled attorney in the complex arena of Class Action Litigation. I would highly recommend him to anyone that is in need of his services."
"I had the pleasure of working for Aaron both while in law school and immediately after I graduated. He was a great mentor who helped improve my writing immensely. Aaron is also a great appellate attorney with a long record of success."
"Aaron worked for my firm several years ago. During his tenure at Krohn & Moss, Ltd. he proved to be an outstanding litigator, brief writer, and orator. His litigation skills have only become sharpened in recent years during which time he has quickly become one of the nation's rising stars in the field of consumer and appellate advocacy. I highly endorse this lawyer!"
Experience
Work Experience
2014 - Present
Partner, Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC
2009 - 2013
Attorney, Weisberg & Meyers, LLC
2006 - 2009
Attorney, Krohn & Moss, LTD
Associations
2015 - Present
State Bar of TexasMember
2007 - Present
Florida BarMember
2006 - Present
Illinois State Bar AssociationMember
Sample of Legal Cases
Stout v. FreeScore, LLC, 743 F.3d 680 (9th Cir. Feb. 21, 2014)
(reversing the district court’s order dismissing the plaintiff’s action under the Credit Repair Organization Act, finding that FreeScore.com falls squarely within the definition of a credit repair organization)
Lea v. Buy Direct, L.L.C., 755 F.3d 250 (5th Cir. 2014)
(reversing the district court’s order dismissing the plaintiff’s action under the Truth in Lending Act, finding that harm is not a prerequisite for relief under the Act)
Payne v. Progressive Fin. Servs., Inc., 748 F.3d 605 (5th Cir. 2014)
(reversing the district court’s order dismissing the plaintiff’s action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, holding that the defendant’s unaccepted offer of judgment did not moot the plaintiff’s action)
Guajardo v. GC Services, LP, No. 11-20269, 2012 WL 5419505 (5th Cir. Nov. 7, 2012)
reversing the district court’s order granting a defendant’s post-trial motions for judgment as a matter of law, to alter or amend the verdict, and for a new trial, and directing the district court to enter judgment in the plaintiff’s favor)
Yunker v. Allianceone Receivables Mgmt., Inc., 701 F.3d 369 (11th Cir. 2012)
(dismissing the defendant’s appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction)
Sorensen v. Credit Int’l Corp., 475 F. App’x 244 (9th Cir. 2012)
(reversing the district court’s award of attorneys’ fees against a consumer)
Mady v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 59 So. 3d 1129 (Fla. 2011)
holding that a consumer who resolves a legal action with a warrantor, pursuant to Florida’s offer of judgment statute, is a prevailing party under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and may recover attorneys’ fees as allowed by the Act)
Talley v. U.S. Dep’t. of Agric., 595 F. 3d 754 (7th Cir. 2010)
(holding that the United States’ sovereign immunity does not protect it, or its agencies, from liability under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act)
Oppenheim v. I.C. Sys., Inc., 627 F. 3d 833 (11th Cir. 2010)
(endorsing a broad interpretation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, finding that a “debt,” as statutorily defined, is created where an obligation to pay arises from a transaction, even absent an extension of credit)
Ponce v. BCA Fin. Serv., Inc., 467 F. App’x 806, 809 (11th Cir. 2012)
Ponce v. BCA Fin. Serv., Inc., 467 F. App’x 806, 809 (11th Cir. 2012)
Education
2006
University of Miami School of Law
JD - Juris Doctor
2002
University of Arizona
BA - Bachelor of Arts
Speaking Engagements
2009
University of DePaul College of Law Litigation Lab
Federal Odometer Act
Languages
English