Austin, TX
Class action Lawyer at Austin, TX
Practice Areas: Class Action, Consumer Protection ... +2 more
OUTCOME: (reversing the district court’s order dismissing the plaintiff’s action under the Credit Repair Organization Act, finding that FreeScore.com falls squarely within the definition of a credit repair organization)
OUTCOME: (reversing the district court’s order dismissing the plaintiff’s action under the Truth in Lending Act, finding that harm is not a prerequisite for relief under the Act)
OUTCOME: (reversing the district court’s order dismissing the plaintiff’s action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, holding that the defendant’s unaccepted offer of judgment did not moot the plaintiff’s action)
OUTCOME: reversing the district court’s order granting a defendant’s post-trial motions for judgment as a matter of law, to alter or amend the verdict, and for a new trial, and directing the district court to enter judgment in the plaintiff’s favor)
OUTCOME: (dismissing the defendant’s appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction)
OUTCOME: (reversing the district court’s award of attorneys’ fees against a consumer)
OUTCOME: holding that a consumer who resolves a legal action with a warrantor, pursuant to Florida’s offer of judgment statute, is a prevailing party under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and may recover attorneys’ fees as allowed by the Act)
OUTCOME: (holding that the United States’ sovereign immunity does not protect it, or its agencies, from liability under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act)
OUTCOME: (endorsing a broad interpretation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, finding that a “debt,” as statutorily defined, is created where an obligation to pay arises from a transaction, even absent an extension of credit)
OUTCOME: Ponce v. BCA Fin. Serv., Inc., 467 F. App’x 806, 809 (11th Cir. 2012)
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
