Cherami Joann Blaney Jenkins

Cherami Joann Blaney Jenkins

1.9
Rating: 8.6

Licensed for 21 years

Family Lawyer at Fort Worth, TX
Practice Areas: Family, Criminal Defense, Divorce & Separation ... +2 more

5128 Birchman Ave, Fort Worth, TX

About Cherami

Biography

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 250-250 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Texas for 21 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 2004

Eligible to Practice in Texas

No misconduct found

Location

Wynne Law Firm

5128 Birchman Ave, Fort Worth, TX, 76107

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Cherami Joann Blaney Jenkins's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.9 /5.0

14 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (14) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 5 of 14 reviews

Posted by anonymous | February 20, 2026 | Hired Attorney | Child Custody

Awful Judge

Gave my child’s father overnight visits after I explained that he is a predator and also abused me physically and mentally our relationship. She yelled at me, called me a liar, and was extremely rude the entire time.

Posted by anonymous | January 14, 2026 | Child Support

Extremely Troubling Experience – Due Process Concerns

My family’s experience in IV-D Court No. 2 under Associate Judge Cherami Jenkins has been deeply concerning. In my son’s child support case, he was incarcerated twice, both times after showing proof of compliance with court obligations. Despite gaining employment after a prior incarceration and... voluntarily submitting weekly payments that exceeded his monthly obligation, Judge Jenkins ordered my son back into custody based on a claimed “missed payment” during a month when he was already jailed by her order and legally unable to earn income. Even after posting a $4,000 cash bond, Judge Jenkins held him in jail several extra days, causing him to lose his job. This pattern repeated in January and resulted in a second job loss, loss of medical coverage for the child, and potential consequences with probation — all directly created by the court’s actions. My son was also forced to proceed without legal representation. The judge went forward despite him having no attorney and denied him the ability to seek counsel, request a continuance, or fully defend himself. He was not allowed to speak or present evidence, while the opposing party and state were given unrestricted time. To make matters worse, the judge ordered my son to remain jailed until a de novo hearing — a full month later — even though the case is already scheduled to be reviewed by an elected district judge. I believe these decisions reflect: • A lack of neutrality • Disregard for financial realities of incarceration • Failure to consider filed motions • Unequal treatment of parties • And serious due process violations Families should expect courts to be fair, balanced, and focused on the best interest of the child — especially where employment, medical insurance, and livelihood are on the line. In our experience, that did not happen in this courtroom. Based on what we witnessed, I cannot recommend IV-D Court No. 2 under Judge Jenkins and strongly encourage any parent assigned to this court to seek counsel, meticulously document proceedings, and immediately request de novo review.

Posted by Phil | March 18, 2025 | Child Support

Absolute corruption corrupts absolutely

Had to go to two different hearings and the second hearing I was late because I had a flat tire when I woke up to leave. Had called the attorney general's office multiple times the week before the hearing to inform them that they needed to do their job according to family code 231.1015 they refuse to... acknowledge or do anything to set the case aside and do their job claimed that that's not how it works or that we can't do that. Would not direct me to somebody who would be able to dismiss the case or set aside on their behalf for not doing their job. And just said you got to talk to the judge when you go to your next hearing. I explained that this judges a psychopath from the little interaction that was observed and demonstrated by judge Jenkins. Truly a scumbag of human being. Berates and attempts to humiliate parent(s). So again when in person in the lobby of the Court area speaking to AG clerks and again showing them the law and asking for them to do their job. I was told that there had already been a warrant sign because I was late and that I could talk to the judge to see if she could withdraw it. So I waited over an hour for her to get back from lunch and while riding out a motion to strike and halfway through writing it, I was called into the courtroom by one of the AG clerks. And upon approaching the bench just as I did two weeks earlier at the other hearing and then a bailiff came up to me and was pushing and moving me to put my hands behind my back as he stated put your hands behind your back. So I had no chance to talk and despite my verbal and pointing out the motion that's in my hand for a motion to strike the procedural order of practice as it pertains to a motion for enforcement is that the court must hear the motion to strike before moving on the motion for enforcement. So besides the fact that I should have never even been there twice because the attorney general refused to do their job. I was jailed for a week. And had my car impounded $450 to get out. But all to come back to court and shackles the next week and be told to keep paying the same amount I've been paying because I don't owe child support I pay my child support. And I've already been paying towards the amount that I was perceived to be behind on , all because the AG refused to follow the law according to 231.1015 .. and because Jenkins is a complete psychopath and also is unconcerned with procedure or law. She needs to be out of this position it's unbelievable the amount of damage she must have done to so many families

Posted by NonCustodial | March 07, 2025 | Child Support

Abuse of Power - Disgusting Judge Behavior!!!

Identical to the other reviews!!! Was hitting me with 30% of income, I explained how I don't get to see my kids according to the decree, she hit me with 36% of my income, because I was putting a burden on her!!! When she is the one telling me she wants to keep them for a bday party or something!!! T...his judge is unbelievable!!! She should be arrested for the duress she puts on the non-custodial!!!

Posted by anonymous | July 31, 2024 | Child Support

She Is Biased Rude And Overall Disgusting

She Doesn't Let You Talk She Tells You To Shut Up She Doesn't Give You A Chance At Anything I Was Put In Jail For Contempt Of Court For A Child Support Payment That's Not What It Is She Has No Soul No Passion She Favors Race She Doesn't Care If Your Sick Or Dying She Is Going To Make An Excuse She Li...ed And Said I Was Belligerent At Court So She Can Sentence Me Yet It Was About A Payment She Claimed I Missed There Is No Communication It's Like This Lady Heart Is Broken She Needs a Hug Or Go Back To Being A Lawyer It's A Power Move

See All Client Reviews

Cherami Joann Blaney Jenkins's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Cherami
Theresa Yoko Vaden Copeland headshot
Theresa Copeland

Family lawyer | Feb 10

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Cherami is a zealous advocate for her clients, is knowledgeable about the law is well prepared and professional. I've worked with her on numerous matters and have never had an encounter with her that wasn't handled with dignity."

Martha Akers Freeman headshot
Martha Akers Freeman

Family lawyer | Jan 21

Relationship: Co-worker

"I have observed Cherami represent her clients. I am very impressed with her concern for and dedication to her clients. It is without reservation that I endorse this lawyer."

David Warren Wynne headshot
David Wynne

Child support lawyer | Jan 20

Relationship: Supervised lawyer

"Cherami is an aggressive advocate for her clients. She has knowledge of the law and she is comfortable in the court room. If you need help collecting child support you should call Cherami."

Leslie Starr Barrows headshot
Leslie Barrows

Family lawyer | Dec 02

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. She works hard for her clients."

Ami Janelle Decker headshot
Ami Decker

Family lawyer | Jul 12

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Ms. Jenkins is a fantastic advocate for her clients and is well-respected among family lawyers in Tarrant County. Her level of professionalism and knowledge of the law are to be admired."

Marlaina Renae Whitsitt headshot
Marlaina Whitsitt

Family lawyer | May 16

Relationship: Co-worker

"Cherami Jenkins is very professional and does a wonderful job for her clients."

Terresha Deneen Wile Stevens headshot
Terresha Stevens

Family lawyer | May 03

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I endorse this lawyer."

Michael S. Waddington headshot
Michael Waddington

Family lawyer | Oct 07

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

View All Endorsements
Theresa Yoko Vaden Copeland headshot
Theresa Copeland

Family lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.6 (Excellent)

Honors

2007

Assistant Attorney General of the Year, Texas Attorney General

Work Experience

2003 - 2012

Assistant Attorney General, Texas Attorney General's Office

Associations

2006 - Present

Tarrant County Family Law Bar Association

Education

2003

Texas Wesleyan University

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution