Lauren Ashley Harris

Lauren Ashley Harris

1.0
Rating: 3.1

Licensed for 13 years

Personal injury Lawyer at Dallas, TX
Practice Areas: Personal Injury, Litigation, Business ... +15 more

PO Box 793414, Dallas, TX

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2023
See Details

About Lauren

Biography

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 250-250 per hour

Contingency

33%-50%

Retainer

Sometimes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Texas for 13 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 2012

Eligible to Practice in Texas

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2023

Location

The Law Offices of Lauren A. Harris

PO Box 793414, Dallas, TX, 75379

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Lauren Ashley Harris's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

2 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (2) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 0
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 2
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Posted by Dorian | May 10, 2021 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Worthless

Would give ZERO stars If I could. Communication was atrocious. Lauren failed to follow through with our executed agreement, missed court deadlines, failed to file paperwork in a timely manner and failed to make court appearances. Her actions led to the dismissal of my case before my day in court. No...w it's too late. Find a responsible attorney, instead.

Lauren Harris

Replied last September 06, 2023

This is the same post, but now without being anonymous, therefore, my response will be largely the same, but changes as follows: “[u]nder the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05, Texas lawyers may not publish a response to a former, current or prospective client's negative review on the internet if the response reveals any confidential information, i.e., information protected by the lawyer-client privilege; or, otherwise relating to a client or furnished by the client; or, acquired by the lawyer during the course of rep./or by reason of the representation of the client. However, Texas attorneys may post a proportional and restrained response that does not reveal any confidential information, or otherwise violate the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct." Therefore, to that end: 1) this review is not based in law, or fact. 2) in my experience, typically people become overly-upset and must point the finger at others in blame -- when the telltale sign of actual fault is truly indicated in the emotional outburst itself -- the more unreasonable the anger -- the more likely that party's action or inaction in causing the issue from which they are so vexed. 3) Attorneys are not free labor sources for anyone in the public to use and abuse at their leisure: when an attorney enters into a contingency -fee agreement, these are a-typical of cases, such as family or criminal law matters, for instance, which CANNOT operate under a contingency fee, at all. The special circumstances allowing for such a beneficial fee-agreement (to the client) are also not required and it is a gratuity; attorneys are entitled to reasonable compensation/costs of litigation, if these items are within the agreement. If one party to a contract does not perform, then it invalidates the other party's need to continue performing based on breach. An attorney's time is valuable and when she gives away her billable time (how persons under a flat-fee or retainer agreement, the typical methods of payment to an attorney for tendering of fees for their work) then even more unreasonable the anger of a client has never remitted a cent in payment. Further, a client is always free to terminate the representation and hire other counsel. No anger would result at all if any attorney in the State was otherwise willing to take on any such viable client, or viable claims, from a party who has the means to pay for the attorney's billable time, or the case expenses necessary to proceed with the litigation. When these are not present, and especially if a client acts in a way that makes the representation repugnant or otherwise so unreasonably difficult that either must terminate the representation, such differences are solved in hiring a new attorney to champion such viable non-abusive working relationships between lawyer and client to the successful resolution the case. As a rule, I invite my clients and potential clients to obtain second, third opinions and advise them to seek other counsel at their first whim of non-copasetic or unsatisfied inclinations. At that point, or any other point, it is not the attorney's prerogative to make the client upset more than it is a failure of any other attorney to accept such circumstances as their working model from that client -- and a failure of the client to realize that if no other attorney will agree to such reality -- then where exactly does the placement of such unreasonable anger truly deserve aim.

Posted by anonymous | March 18, 2020 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Wouldn't recommend to anyone

I've had a few attorneys before. Lauren started off pretty well. She told me everything I wanted to hear to get my case the basically disappeared. She has missed court dates, failed to file court documents in a timely manner, missed appointments, and has poor communication in general. I would not rec...ommend her services to anyone.

Lauren Harris

Replied last July 24, 2023

Under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.05, Texas lawyers may not publish a response to a former, current or prospective client's negative review on the internet if the response reveals any confidential information, i.e., information protected by the lawyer-client privilege; or, otherwise relating to a client or furnished by the client; or, acquired by the lawyer during the cours eof rep./or by reason of the representation of the client. However, Texas attorneys may post a proportional and restrained response that does not reveal any confidential information, or otherwise violate the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct; therefore, to that end: 1) this review is not based in law, or fact. 2) where posted anonymously, the alleged "client" is likely not a client or former client, at all. 3) Should this be persons/entities targeting my business and reputation for personal malicious purposes, your negativity remains unsuccessful. I hope you find happiness in life which takes the place of of any further time and attention spent preoccupied with me. 4) Should you be the recipient of a dismissed grievance action which was unsuccessfully applied to my law license: the State Bar of Texas Grievance process is a serious administrative proceeding to regulate Texas attorneys and protect the public from unscrupulous lawyers. However, and unfortunately, it is not only used for valid complaints, but this process, when manipulated for improper purpose, only serves to hurt all parties involved, as the attorney must take time and effort away from the clients and tasks deserving of her time, to address the complaint/procedures -- no matter if the attorney repeatedly emerges victorious and vindicated; the time, stress and expense necessary to defend themselves before the State Bar to protect their license against allegations of professional misconduct, especially when the allegations are not grounded in fact, law or reality, is a truly an unfortunate mar on the profession. The grievance process is not a means of leveraging an attorney to do something that an attorney is not legally required to do, or if the conduct sought would be against the rules of professional conduct, or personally repugnant to the attorney herself. While vindication in dismissal of such grievances can be won by the attorney, the unnecessary operation in defending themselves can/is a waste of everyone's time, and the toll alone, even in triumph, places unnecessary strain on the legal profession/attorneys, and their deserving clients.

See All Client Reviews

Lauren Ashley Harris's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Lauren
Allen Ross Blake headshot
Allen Blake

Insurance lawyer | Mar 25

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Thomas Daniel Murphree headshot
Thomas Murphree

Insurance lawyer | Aug 06

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Daniel Wayne Ray headshot
Daniel Ray

Insurance lawyer | Jul 20

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I heartily endorse this lawyer. Lauren is a consummate professional, and an able adversary. I wouldn't think twice about using her services or listening to her professional opinion."

Abigail K. Sullivan headshot
Abigail Sullivan

Insurance lawyer | Jul 20

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Ms. Harris has an expansive knowledge of various areas of civil litigation. She is fierce and strategic to the finest degree."

View All Endorsements
Thomas Daniel Murphree headshot
Thomas Murphree

Unknown lawyer

Toby L. Shook headshot
Toby Shook

Criminal defense lawyer

Daniel Wayne Ray headshot
Daniel Ray

State, local, and municipal law lawyer

Abigail K. Sullivan headshot
Abigail Sullivan

State, local, and municipal law lawyer

Experience

Rating:  3.1 (Caution)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2023.

Partially Probated Suspension issued in TX, 2023

updated on 09/05/2023

Partially Probated Suspension means an attorney lost his or her license to practice law for a period of time. When the attorney returns to practice, he or she will be on probation, meaning the State monitors the attorney's activities for a period of time in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior.

Work Experience

2015 - 2015

Associate attorney, Adkerson, Hauder & Bezney, P.C.

2013 - 2015

Associate Attorney, Young, Bill, Roumbos & Boles, P.A.

2012 - 2013

Partner, Kweller & Harris Law, PLLC

Associations

2012 - Present

National Association of Professional Women

Member

2012 - Present

State Bar of Texas

Member

Education

2011

Texas A&M University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

2006

University of North Texas

Bachelors of Applied Arts & Sciences

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2023
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution