|TX||Eligible To Practice In Texas||1989||02/26/2017|
|Award name||Grantor||Date granted|
|AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated||Martindale-Hubbell||2014|
|AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated||Martindale-Hubbell||2013|
|AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated||Martindale-Hubbell||2012|
|AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated||Martindale-Hubbell||2011|
|AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated||Martindale-Hubbell||2010|
|AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated||Martindale-Hubbell||2009|
|Senior Counsel||Hammerle, Finley & Scroggins, LLP||2005 - Present|
|Partner||Haynes and Boone, LLP||1998 - 2005|
|Associate||Haynes and Boone, LLP||1993 - 1998|
|ADA||Tarrant County District Attorney's Office||1992 - 1993|
|Association name||Position name||Duration|
|Texas Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers||N/A||2007 - Present|
|Denton County Bar Association||Member||2005 - Present|
|U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas||Member||2005 - Present|
|State Bar of Texas||Member||1989 - Present|
|U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas||Member||1989 - Present|
|Gross, et al. v. Burt, et al.||Order reversed|
|In Interest of Baby Girl T., 904 S.W.2d 206||N/A|
|See all legal cases|
|Tarrant County Bar Bulletin||Birds of a Feather Get Sued Together||2004|
|Fort Worth Business Press||What, Me Worry?||2003|
|Texas Tech University School of Law||Law||JD - Juris Doctor||1989|
|University of Texas System, Austin||Journalism||Bachelor of Journalism||1986|
|Brown Bag Seminar||Offers of Settlement and Proportionate Responsibility Under House Bill 4||2003|
Posted by anonymous
Billable hours did seem to be, in my opinion (and that of the previous reviewer), more important to Mr. Price than anything else. Witnesses were never contacted or used. Evidence was never looked at or used. Phone calls and emails were not returned. Things that needed to be filed with the court were not filed when he said they would be (In several cases, months passed). He didn't seem to be prepared for hearings. He didn't even seem to remember what the case was about and who everyone was. In short, we were unimportant to Mr. Price and it showed.
Trustworthy: No, not when he told us one thing and did another.
Responsive: No, not even close.
Knowledgeable: About our case? No. We constantly had to remind him of the facts of the case.
Kept me informed: I want to laugh at this but I'll just say no.
To sum up, researching a lawyer before committing would have saved us money, property, and heartache. A mistake we won't ever make again.
Posted by anonymous
Mr. Price, in my opinion, has primarily one objective, billable hours. In my case, he seldom returned my phone calls (never in a timely manner). He waited until the "eleventh hour to
prepare for trial. He attempted to contact witnesses the day before trial.
His representation was very poor. His firm billed my credit card $1,600 without my authorization which I learned after the fact. My advice to consumers--research your attorney and the law firm prior to hire...Had I accessed this page prior to selecting Mr. Price for my case, I could have saved my self heartache and headache. Mr. Price's over-all attitude towards my case was one of indifference. An attoney is an investment and I made an exceedingly poor one!