Richard Rensch

PRO

Richard Rensch

also known as Dick

4.9
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 48 years

Workers compensation Lawyer at Omaha, NE
Practice Areas: Workers Compensation, Motorcycle Accident, Personal Injury ... +2 more

7602 Pacific Street, suite 102, Omaha, NE

Virtual Consultation Available

Free Consultation

About Richard

Biography

Mission: Improving The Well Being of Needlessly Injured Nebraskans. Free Consult.

Dedicated To Improving The Well Being of Injured Nebraskans. Free Initial Consultation

Dedicated To Improving The Well Being of Injured Nebraskans. Free Initial Consultation

Dedicated To Improving The Well Being of Injured Nebraskans. Free Initial Consultation

Dedicated To Improving The Well Being of Injured Nebraskans. Free Initial Consultation

Dedicated To Improving The Well Being of Injured Nebraskans. Free Initial Consultation

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Motorcycle Accident 25%

wrongful deaths, broken backs, closed head injuries, rotator cuffs, busted ribs, broken legs, broken ankles, severe scarring, road rash, lost wages, suit against motorcycle insurer for failure to pay theft loss. Platte County, Columbus, Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska, Douglas County, Ne, Sarpy County, Nebraska, Dodge County, Nebraska, Fatboy, Harley Davidson

48 years

25%
Workers Compensation 25%

permanent total disabilities, 100% loss of earning capacity, multiple successful appeals, meat packing suits, warehousing injuries, trucking accident claims, claims against municipal employers, sub contract interpreters, multiple workers compensation death claims, drowning, amputation on the job, RSD claims, CRPS claims

48 years

25%
Car Accident 20%

multiple jury trials, multiple jury verdicts, suits against General Motors, Ford Motor Company and Firestone, multiple verdicts and settlements because of wrongful deaths, drunk driving, improper highway signage, improperly graded county roads, teenage wrongful deaths, speeding, improper turn, failure to yield, running red lights, running stop signs, following too close, improper parking on highways, rollovers, striking pedestrians, rural intersections

48 years

20%
Personal Injury 20%

multiple jury trial verdicts awards and settlements arising from multiple wrongful deaths, denial of insurance coverage, amputations, burns, suits against trucking firms, dog bites, motorcycle accident, auto accident, workers' compensations claims and other injury claims, to include medical malpractice verdict and settlements

48 years | 10,000 cases

20%
Medical Malpractice 10%

multiple jury trials for: wrongful death, paralysis, cervical cancer, brachial plexus nerve damage, improper injections, birth injuries, bowel perforations, vascular surgical misadventures / verdict, settlements include: wrongful death, amputation, bowel perforations, misdiagnosed breast cancers, bladder injuries, detached retina, delayed diagnosed corneal ulcers, botched laparoscopic hernia repairs, gall bladder removals and oophorectomies / misdiagnosed biopsies

48 years

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes

Contingency

33%-40%


Payment Methods

  • Cash

Awards

Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2016
AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating

Licenses

Licensed in Nebraska for 48 years

State: Nebraska

Acquired: 1977

Senior Active

No misconduct found

Location

Rensch & Rensch Law

7602 Pacific Street, suite 102, Omaha, NE, 68114

renschandrensch.com

Rensch & Rensch Law

1470 25th Avenue, Columbus, NE, 68601

renschandrensch.com

Online Presence

Other places you can find Richard online.

Richard Rensch's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.9 /5.0

14 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (14) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews | General Knowledge

Posted by Liz | June 10, 2016 | Hired Attorney

Awesome Attorney

Dick was extremely knowledgeable regarding my case. He was able to guide me and give me several ways to take care of my situation! I am so very thankful for his services!!! I would hire Dick again, if I ever have a need (hopefully that won't be the case) and I'd highly recommend Dick to everyone I... know!

Posted by John | January 03, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Personal Injury

Dick Rensch, Attorney.

Mr Rensch did an outstanding job for my family as an attorney for two auto accidents that involved personal injury and property. All my damages were covered thanks to Mr Rensch. I could not be happier with Mr Rensch. Mr Rensch dealt with insurance companies, attorneys and clearly was the ultimate exp...ert in handling all aspects of resolving both of these car wrecks. One of the auto accident was particularly stressful to me involving my wife and son until Mr Rensch was our advocate. Without reservation I recommend Mr Rensch for anyone searching or in need of a aggressive and competent Attorney. Since that time, I sent a niece for his help after she was broadsided by someone running a red light suffering a head injury. Mr Rensch fought for her to receive the correct medical care, car replacement and personal damages. She is now a healthy young mother thanks in large part to Mr Rensch.

Posted by Charles | January 03, 2016 | Hired Attorney

Always there for me

I have personally benefited from Dick’s legal advice and counsel for over 40 years in many different situations. His understanding and application of the law has consistently demonstrated sound reasoning, and objectivity along with an acute sense of fairness. He is greatly respected among his peers, ...colleagues, and friends as a seasoned leader with the highest caliber of professional skills and legal instincts.

See All Client Reviews

Richard Rensch's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Richard
Matthew G. Miller headshot
Matthew Miller

Personal injury lawyer | Jan 06

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Dick Rensch is a very capable lawyer. He is creative, insightful, and personable. He has a demonstrated track record of success in the courtroom."

Craig L. Kelley headshot
Craig Kelley

Personal injury lawyer | Jan 04

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Dick is a great trial lawyer and his team works hard for their clients, both helping them heal, and bringing their cases to an excellent conclusion."

Patrick B. Donahue headshot
Patrick Donahue

Motorcycle accident lawyer | Jan 04

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I have handled cases against Dick Rensch and I have always found him a strong advocate for this clients and an attorney that gets equally good results for the. I recommend him highly. Patrick Donahue"

Michael J Haller Jr. headshot
Michael Haller

Workers compensation lawyer | Aug 17

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I strongly endorse this lawyer. Dick likes to help people and searches until he can find the solution and answers that are needed for a case. He is empathetic to one in pain and his trial experience is time tested. Dick works hard to see that the right outcome happens for his clients."

Justin High headshot
Justin High

Workers compensation lawyer | Jun 25

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I've worked on cases with Dick since I was a young lawyer and I've learned a lot from him. He truly cares about his clients and he is willing to do what it takes to get them what they deserve. He's a class act and his decades of experience benefit his clients and our profession as a whole."

Mark S. Dickhute headshot
Mark Dickhute

Personal injury lawyer | Jun 25

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"Richard is a very competent, skilled trial attorney."

Vincent M. Powers headshot
Vincent Powers

Personal injury lawyer | Jun 24

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Dick works hard, cares deeply and demands that his client be treated fairly"

James E Harris headshot
James Harris

Personal injury lawyer | Aug 05

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Dick Rensch as an outstanding plaintiffs' attorney. Dick demonstrates all the caring, committed and savvy characteristics that a seriously injured victim deserves."

Daniel Richard Stockmann headshot
Daniel Stockmann

Personal injury lawyer | Jul 15

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

View All Endorsements
Rodney J. Rehm headshot
Rodney Rehm

Workers compensation lawyer

Carmen David Caruso headshot
Carmen Caruso

Litigation lawyer

Patrick B. Donahue headshot
Patrick Donahue

Litigation lawyer

Craig L. Kelley headshot
Craig Kelley

Personal injury lawyer

Michael J Haller Jr. headshot
Michael Haller

Social Security & Disability lawyer

Justin High headshot
Justin High

Personal injury lawyer

Daniel Richard Stockmann headshot
Daniel Stockmann

Litigation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2025

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2015

Multi-Million Dollar Advocate, Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum

2015

The Top 100 Trial Lawyers, American Trial Lawyers Association

2015

Million Dollar Advocate, Million Dollar Advocates Forum

2008

The Top 100 Trial Lawyers, American Trial Lawyers Association

1987

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1985 - Present

Senior Partner, Rensch and Rensch Law

1980 - 1985

Trial Attorney, Hansen & Engles

1977 - 1980

Deputy Public Defender, Douglas County Public Defenders Office

Associations

1990 - Present

National Trial Lawyers Association

Member

1985 - Present

Nebraska Association of Trial Attorneys

Member

1980 - Present

American Bar Association

Member

1977 - Present

Nebraska State Bar Association

Member

1977 - Present

Omaha Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Cohan v. Medical Imaging Consultants, P.C. ET Al, 297 Neb. 568, 902 N.W.2d 98 (Neb. 2017)

Reversal of dismissal

GARDNER V INTERNATIONAL PAPER

Nebraska Supreme Court upheld the final Award of Permanent Total Loss of Earning Capacity

Montoya v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 041712 NECA, A - 11 – 624 (Neb. 2012)

100% Permanent Total Disability / Incapacidad total 100% permanente

Sickler v. Kirby, 805 N.W.2d 675, 19 Neb. App. 286 (Neb. 2011)

Order of dismissal was overturned by the Nebraska Supreme Court and allowed client to try the case.

David v. DeLeon, 250 Neb. 109, 547 N.W.2d 726 (Neb. 1996)

Favorable for Mr. David and all plaintiffs suffering preexisting medical conditions since the decision.

Hulett v. Ranch Bowl of Omaha, Inc., 251 Neb. 189, 556 N.W.2d 23 (Neb. 1996)

Jury verdict upheld for client.

Natl Am Ins. Co. of Nebraska, Inc. v. Continental Western Ins. Co., 243 Neb. 766, 502 N.W. 817 (Neb. 1993)

Client was allowed to collect on his $375,000 verdict.

Snell v. 18th Amendment, 3 NECA 362, A – 91 - 617 (Neb. App. 1991)

Jury verdict for parents

Pitt v. Checker Cab Co., 217 Neb. 600, 350 N.W.2d 507 (Neb. 1984)

Defendant appealed on basis of excessive Jury Vertict ! Verdict was for 143 x his medical bills. In Douglas County District Court.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1977

Creighton University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1974

University of Nebraska

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2015

Trial Techniques / Successful Verdicts

Combining Preexisting Conditions with the Work Injury: R&R LAW SPR

2005

Nebraska Bar Association Annual Meeting

Persistence in Trial Work

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution