We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
also known as J. Lee Novelli
Licensed Attorney since 2000 with substantial experience in the area of family law. High premium on ethical practices, rigorous representation and responsive advocacy.
3
Practice Areas
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Minnesota
Acquired: 2004
No misconduct found
State: New York
Acquired: 2000
No misconduct found
150 South Fifth Street, Suite 1320, Minneapolis, MN, 55402
26 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Punctuality
Posted by Danielle | January 27, 2014 | Child Custody
Excellent Representation
Lee provided me with excellent representation during a complicated, highly emotional custody negotiation. Lee staunchly refused to participate in character assassinations, petty arguments and antagonistic measures (all while taking the brunt of the opposing sides' fully vested commitment to that appr...
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
2024
Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers
2012
Rising Star, Super Lawyers Magazine
2011
Rising Star, Super Lawyers Magazine
2013 - Present
Owner and Attorney at Law, Novelli Law Office, P.A.
2011 - 2012
Attorney at Law, Binder Law Offices, P.A.
2009 - 2011
Senior Associate Attorney, Kathleen M. Newman + Associates, P.A.
2005 - 2009
Associate Attorney, M. Sue Wilson Law Offices, P.A.
2005 - Present
Minnesota State Bar AssociationMember
Member
2005 - 2017
Hennepin County Bar AssociationProgram Co-Chair
Appellant's requests were denied and the Court remanded the issue of security for spousal maintenance.
Reversed and remanded
The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's order denying father's request to terminate his child support obligation.
Reversed and remanded. The Court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in limiting parenting time, but could not modify custody without an evidentiary hearing or award attorney's fees without permitting Appellant to respond.
Reversed and remanded. The Court of Appeals found that the district court's finding were inadequate to support the divsion of marital assets and the evidence did not support the determination of wife's income for support purposes.
2000
JD - Juris Doctor
1995
BA - Bachelor of Arts
2013
2012
The Top 10 Cases All Advanced Family Lawyers Should Know
2011
2009
Business Valuations in a Down Economy
2016
Norwegian
Spanish
Legal Answers