Emily K. Cooper

Emily K. Cooper

4.0
Rating: 9.6

Licensed for 29 years

Family Lawyer at Minneapolis, MN
Practice Areas: Family, Social Security

825 Nicollet Mall, Suite 925, Minneapolis, MN

About Emily

Biography

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Family 80%

I represent people in all areas of family law practice. I have experience in divorce, child custody, parenting time, paternity and third-party custody cases. My experience includes settlement of cases, arguing motions and going to trial. I am able to handle simple and very complex family law cases.

30 years

80%
Social Security & Disability 20%

As a member of the National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives (NOSSCR), I provide representation to people in social security claims at all levels from the initial application to the administrative hearing.

16 years

20%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 75-200 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Minnesota for 25 years

State: Minnesota

Acquired: 2000

Authorized to Practice

No misconduct found

Licensed in Michigan for 28 years

State: Michigan

Acquired: 1997

Voluntary Inactive

No misconduct found

Licensed in Ohio for 29 years

State: Ohio

Acquired: 1996

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Cooper Law, LLC

825 Nicollet Mall, Suite 925, Minneapolis, MN, 55402-2100

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Emily K. Cooper's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.0 /5.0

16 Client Reviews

5 star (12)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (4)

Posted by anonymous | November 19, 2023 | Consulted Attorney

This review is from a potential client who consulted with this attorney.

Couldn’t even make it to pre-screen

I was looking for SSA representation and everything went great until trying to find a time for my pre-screening. From the way she communicates, it seems she doesn’t understand that disabled people can also be extremely busy. Only contacting people only on Sundays, without even asking about availabl...e time frames is not the way to go. Not only did I tell her two different time frames to contact me (and she didn’t), but then I also applied to five other places over five days and scheduled pre-screenings with three of them, in the week that it took me to even hear from her about POSSIBLY scheduling a time for pre-screening. Even people who had to turn me away were much better at committing and gave me referrals to other agencies. She is not worth your time.

Emily Cooper

Replied last December 5, 2023

We have pre-screen interviews all week, including some weekends. We just happened to be trying to do work on a weekend to try and reach out to people who sometimes are not available during the week or were on our list of people we needed to touch base with. I don't think I have ever heard anyone be dissatisfied because we were willing to work on weekends and do extra work above and beyond what most firms will do! If Sunday did not work, just respond with - I need a different day! We offer sliding scale fee and affordable full representation for family law matters in Minnesota and we provide representation for people in social security disability matters. We try to meet our clients where they are by offering communication by phone, in-person, mail and text. We also try to offer times outside the normal hours for services because we know not every one can fit into the 9-5, Monday-Friday mold. If something does not work for you, just let us know and we will do what we can to make it work!

Posted by anonymous | April 18, 2023 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Avoid

Emily took on my case at the tail end of my first application for the final in-person appeal hearing, which was basically a shoe-in fee for her had I been awarded. When I was denied, Emily refused to help me reapply until I jumped through certain weird medical hoops to satisfy her. This syste...m which I was struggling to navigate and meet all the demands, made my health even worse and drove me into poverty. Failure to secure a decent medical team and lawyer to assist me on the front end caused me to lose necessary credits for SSDI eligibility. I did not continue with Emily. Another attorney (SC) took my case upon referral from one of my doctors, and SC helped me reapply right away so as not to waste more time. I was awarded SSI with another attorney’s help after *7 years* of struggling. SC my new attorney explained what was wrong about the application I submitted UP FRONT and that was very helpful, guided me to answer the loaded questions on the application. Apparently when SSA asks about hobbies, they mean “what are you engaging in now” not what you are interested in and what have you enjoyed in the past. Also one of my doctors prescribed a medicine to me that was destroying my health, he was pressuring me to continue, he refused to listen to me and he wrote some things in the medical record that were extremely unbecoming that the SSA judges pulled out as apart of their denial letter. Emily talked up my case to my face, gave me hope, (presumably to get me as a client bc under SSDI I stood to gain quite a lot in back pay) — and then criticized and spoke patronizingly to me after the loss. I didn’t need to do anything special for SC, my new attorney. SC just helped me. Like Emily could have but chose not to. Avoid Emily.

Emily Cooper

Replied last April 19, 2023

Since this was posted by an anonymous person, I am unable to determine if I actually had anything to do with the claim referenced. However, from reading, it appears this person is upset because he/she came to my office with a claim that had already been filed and was at the hearing level. This claim was ultimately denied at hearing due to information submitted prior to my office representing the person. After the hearing loss, my office declined to continue representing this poster. The person then appears to have made some changes in medical treatment, found someone else to file a new claim and was awarded. It's good to hear that he/she was able to get needed benefits eventually but it does not appear that me or my firm did anything wrong. In general, my office has a contract with the State of Minnesota and we work primarily with people who are on public assistance or are homeless. If someone falls within the contract, we do not charge anything for our services - basically we represent the person pro bono. We do not get any of a person's back pay if they qualify under the contract so the allegations that we somehow wanted back pay have no merit because my office does not get any back pay for most of our clients. We are paid from separate funds from the State of Minnesota per the contract. In addition, we do not solicit people to become our clients or tell them they have a good claim in order to have them become our client so any statement that we told someone they have a good claim so they would work with us is inaccurate. Most of our clients are referrals from other agencies or social workers that are looking to have their clients get assistance under our contract with the State of Minnesota. If someone comes to the firm and is already at the hearing level, this means they have had two denials and the claim already has a lot of medical evidence and other information in it that we cannot change because it was submitted before we took over the claim. Therefore, our job is to try to do the best we can with whatever is handed to us. Unfortunately, it sounds from the description that prior to our taking on the claim, as stated by the poster, there was already some negative evidence submitted in the claim that led to a denial at a hearing. We likely told his person about the negative evidence that caused the denial which resulted in this person feeling like we were criticizing or patronizing him/her. We apologize if the discussion after the hearing made him/her feel that way. However, we try to be honest with our clients so that they know what they need to do to be successful in a claim and to understand the weaknesses in a claim. It is our duty as representatives to assure our clients understand the good and bad news about his/her claim and sometime people have a difficult time processing negative information. Some claims that are denied at a hearing can be improved after the hearing and can possibly support starting over and filing another claim. Reasons why those claims can win after re-filing a new claim vary but mostly are because the person is older (people over 50 have a less difficult time getting approved for benefits) or the person has obtained new medical treatment or a new diagnosis. We typically will not re-file with someone who was difficult to work with or who was unable to be contacted or who has weak medical evidence. Otherwise, we may offer to re-file a new claim for a client after a hearing denial. It appears we did not want to re-file a new claim with this poster for reasons that I am not sure of and could not disclose anyway due to privacy reasons. However, if this poster moved on and made significant changes in medical treatment or got older or found a representative that was a better fit for him/her, that is great and likely led to an approval of needed benefits. Congratulations on getting approved for benefits. We hope this helps you to be able to get your needs met.

Posted by Johanna | June 18, 2019 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

5 stars

Emily Cooper was very knowledgeable and helpful with the case to retain custody of my son. I have an intellectual disability and she was very, very patient with me as she explained what I needed to do and to provide in order to appear in court. I will go to her firm again if the need arises.

Posted by Cathy | June 14, 2018 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Excellent lawyer - Highly recommend

Emily not only provided me with excellent legal representation from start to finish; she also was instrumental with helping me find my voice and confidence following a difficult divorce. When I hired Emily, she was open and honest about her approach, delivered the facts, fought hard for me, was patie...nt with me and helped me to understand my rights. She took time to answer my questions and settle my fears. A courtroom can be intimidating and with her by my side, I always felt I was in good hands. Her representation made all the difference for the end result where we "won" a long battle. She was also conscious of fees and never over-charged. It has been a couple years since winning our case and I will forever be grateful to her for not only her hard work and professionalism, but also for her humanity. She treated me with such patience, dignity and respect, never talking down to me. I never felt like just a "case". I would recommend Emily to anyone in need of legal representation. She knows her stuff, cares about her clients, is professional yet human, is tough, fact-based and will fight for what is right. Because of Emily, I feel a renewed sense of hope and faith that with persistence and patience, the right people come along who will stand by and with you for what is right and just.

Posted by Ray | June 5, 2018 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Review

Emily asked me to write a review on her website. I did but I’m doing it here again too. A little about myself. I’m a type A, workaholic person. I don’t believe in leaving your job until the job is done. I’m sure Emily got tired of my endless questions and frustration at the legal system. But her and ...her associate worked with me. My ex just kept coming at, and this time she lost. I would try and try to talk with her about unaccompanied minor status, and it was always no or some other time. We finally took her back to court when mediation was not going to work. Not only did we get unaccompanied minor, but the entire summer. Remember guys, the victory is always worth the struggle. I’ve learned immediate results do not constitute poor work ethic. Emily and Whitney are amazing. I will keep paying Emily because my ex will never leave me alone. Hire these two, they know how to win.

See All Client Reviews

Emily K. Cooper's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Emily
Samuel John Glover headshot
Samuel Glover

Family lawyer | Apr 26

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Emily is an outstanding lawyer with years of experience representing clients dealing with personal crises."

Barry Alan Cattadoris headshot
Barry Cattadoris

Family lawyer | Nov 01

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Ms. Cooper is a highly experienced and dedicated family law attorney. Her extensive experience from in the courtroom serves her clients wel!"

View All Endorsements
Daniel R. Tyson headshot
Daniel Tyson

Real estate lawyer

Samuel John Glover headshot
Samuel Glover

Debt collection lawyer

Experience

Rating:  9.6 (Superb)

Honors

2001

20 Under 40 Award, Toledo, Ohio Community Award

Work Experience

2010 - Present

Owner, Cooper Law, LLC

2010 - 2015

Adjunct Professor, William Mitchell College of Law

2007 - 2010

Staff Attorney, Central Minnesota Legal Services

2004 - 2007

Executive Director, Minnesota Volunteer Attorney Program

2001 - 2004

In-House Counsel, Dana Corporation

1996 - 2001

Attorney, Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick

Associations

2013 - Present

Minnesota State Bar Association Social Security Section

Officer

2010 - Present

National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives (NOSSCR)

Member

2009 - Present

Anoka County Bar Association

Member

2005 - Present

Minnesota State Bar Association

Member

2005 - Present

Hennepin County Bar Association

Member

2013 - 2014

Minnesota State Bar Association, Family Law Section, Domestic Abuse Committee

Chair

2011 - 2013

Hennepin County Attorney Conservatorship/Guardianship Panel

Member

2011 - 2013

Minnesota State Bar Association - Social Security Section

Treasurer

2010 - 2014

MN Supreme Court Committee for Equality and Justice

Member

2010 - 2014

Minnesota Association of Black Lawyers

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Name Withheld

Judgment in favor of my client in amount of $110,000

Name Withheld

Court decision in favor of my client after 2-day trial

Name withheld - HRO Defense

Dismissal of HROs against client

See More Legal Cases

Education

1996

University of Minnesota Law School

JD - Juris Doctor- Juris Doctor

Speaking Engagements

2013

Minnesota Guardian Ad Litem Statewide Conference

Guardian Ad Litems: The Legal Perspective

2010

Using LinkedIn to Market Your Firm and Win Your Family Law Cases

Social Media

2010

Using Facebook to Market Your Firm and Win Your Family Law Cases

Social Media

2010

Social Media for Attorneys Seminars

Social Media Marketing

2010

Litigaton 101 for Paralegals

Civil and Family Law Litigation

2010

2009 Family Law Institute

Social Networking for Family Law Attorneys

2009

2008 Family Law Institute

Low-Cost Litigation for Family Law Attorneys

Publications

2010

Health News An Alternative to GAMC: Advocacy Program Offers Help With Social Security Disability Application

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution