$ 75-200 per hour
I offer experienced family law representation with sliding scale rates for clients of modest means. My law firm focuses on family law, social security and victims' rights matters.
2
Practice Areas
30 years
$ 75-200 per hour
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Minnesota
Acquired: 2000
No misconduct found
State: Michigan
Acquired: 1997
No misconduct found
State: Ohio
Acquired: 1996
No misconduct found
825 Nicollet Mall, Suite 925, Minneapolis, MN, 55402-2100
Showing 1 - 5 of 16 client reviews from Avvo
Posted by anonymous | November 19, 2023 | Consulted Attorney
I was looking for SSA representation and everything went great until trying to find a time for my pre-screening. From the way she communicates, it seems she doesn’t understand that disabled people can also be extremely busy. Only contacting people only on Sundays, without even asking about availabl...
We have pre-screen interviews all week, including some weekends. We just happened to be trying to do work on a weekend to try and reach out to people who sometimes are not available during the week or were on our list of people we needed to touch base with. I don't think I have ever heard anyone be dissatisfied because we were willing to work on weekends and do extra work above and beyond what most firms will do! If Sunday did not work, just respond with - I need a different day! We offer sliding scale fee and affordable full representation for family law matters in Minnesota and we provide representation for people in social security disability matters. We try to meet our clients where they are by offering communication by phone, in-person, mail and text. We also try to offer times outside the normal hours for services because we know not every one can fit into the 9-5, Monday-Friday mold. If something does not work for you, just let us know and we will do what we can to make it work!
Posted by anonymous | April 18, 2023 | Hired Attorney
Emily took on my case at the tail end of my first application for the final in-person appeal hearing, which was basically a shoe-in fee for her had I been awarded. When I was denied, Emily refused to help me reapply until I jumped through certain weird medical hoops to satisfy her. This syste...
Since this was posted by an anonymous person, I am unable to determine if I actually had anything to do with the claim referenced. However, from reading, it appears this person is upset because he/she came to my office with a claim that had already been filed and was at the hearing level. This claim was ultimately denied at hearing due to information submitted prior to my office representing the person. After the hearing loss, my office declined to continue representing this poster. The person then appears to have made some changes in medical treatment, found someone else to file a new claim and was awarded. It's good to hear that he/she was able to get needed benefits eventually but it does not appear that me or my firm did anything wrong. In general, my office has a contract with the State of Minnesota and we work primarily with people who are on public assistance or are homeless. If someone falls within the contract, we do not charge anything for our services - basically we represent the person pro bono. We do not get any of a person's back pay if they qualify under the contract so the allegations that we somehow wanted back pay have no merit because my office does not get any back pay for most of our clients. We are paid from separate funds from the State of Minnesota per the contract. In addition, we do not solicit people to become our clients or tell them they have a good claim in order to have them become our client so any statement that we told someone they have a good claim so they would work with us is inaccurate. Most of our clients are referrals from other agencies or social workers that are looking to have their clients get assistance under our contract with the State of Minnesota. If someone comes to the firm and is already at the hearing level, this means they have had two denials and the claim already has a lot of medical evidence and other information in it that we cannot change because it was submitted before we took over the claim. Therefore, our job is to try to do the best we can with whatever is handed to us. Unfortunately, it sounds from the description that prior to our taking on the claim, as stated by the poster, there was already some negative evidence submitted in the claim that led to a denial at a hearing. We likely told his person about the negative evidence that caused the denial which resulted in this person feeling like we were criticizing or patronizing him/her. We apologize if the discussion after the hearing made him/her feel that way. However, we try to be honest with our clients so that they know what they need to do to be successful in a claim and to understand the weaknesses in a claim. It is our duty as representatives to assure our clients understand the good and bad news about his/her claim and sometime people have a difficult time processing negative information. Some claims that are denied at a hearing can be improved after the hearing and can possibly support starting over and filing another claim. Reasons why those claims can win after re-filing a new claim vary but mostly are because the person is older (people over 50 have a less difficult time getting approved for benefits) or the person has obtained new medical treatment or a new diagnosis. We typically will not re-file with someone who was difficult to work with or who was unable to be contacted or who has weak medical evidence. Otherwise, we may offer to re-file a new claim for a client after a hearing denial. It appears we did not want to re-file a new claim with this poster for reasons that I am not sure of and could not disclose anyway due to privacy reasons. However, if this poster moved on and made significant changes in medical treatment or got older or found a representative that was a better fit for him/her, that is great and likely led to an approval of needed benefits. Congratulations on getting approved for benefits. We hope this helps you to be able to get your needs met.
Posted by Johanna | June 18, 2019 | Hired Attorney
Emily Cooper was very knowledgeable and helpful with the case to retain custody of my son. I have an intellectual disability and she was very, very patient with me as she explained what I needed to do and to provide in order to appear in court. I will go to her firm again if the need arises.
Posted by Cathy | June 14, 2018 | Hired Attorney
Emily not only provided me with excellent legal representation from start to finish; she also was instrumental with helping me find my voice and confidence following a difficult divorce. When I hired Emily, she was open and honest about her approach, delivered the facts, fought hard for me, was patie...
Posted by Ray | June 5, 2018 | Hired Attorney
Emily asked me to write a review on her website. I did but I’m doing it here again too. A little about myself. I’m a type A, workaholic person. I don’t believe in leaving your job until the job is done. I’m sure Emily got tired of my endless questions and frustration at the legal system. But her and ...
"Emily is an outstanding lawyer with years of experience representing clients dealing with personal crises."
"Ms. Cooper is a highly experienced and dedicated family law attorney. Her extensive experience from in the courtroom serves her clients wel!"
Real estate lawyer
Debt collection lawyer
2001
20 Under 40 Award, Toledo, Ohio Community Award
2010 - Present
Owner, Cooper Law, LLC
2010 - 2015
Adjunct Professor, William Mitchell College of Law
2007 - 2010
Staff Attorney, Central Minnesota Legal Services
2004 - 2007
Executive Director, Minnesota Volunteer Attorney Program
2001 - 2004
In-House Counsel, Dana Corporation
1996 - 2001
Attorney, Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick
2013 - Present
Minnesota State Bar Association Social Security SectionOfficer
2010 - Present
National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives (NOSSCR)Member
2009 - Present
Anoka County Bar AssociationMember
2005 - Present
Minnesota State Bar AssociationMember
2005 - Present
Hennepin County Bar AssociationMember
2013 - 2014
Minnesota State Bar Association, Family Law Section, Domestic Abuse CommitteeChair
2011 - 2013
Hennepin County Attorney Conservatorship/Guardianship PanelMember
2011 - 2013
Minnesota State Bar Association - Social Security SectionTreasurer
2010 - 2014
MN Supreme Court Committee for Equality and JusticeMember
2010 - 2014
Minnesota Association of Black LawyersMember
Judgment in favor of my client in amount of $110,000
Court decision in favor of my client after 2-day trial
Dismissal of HROs against client
1996
JD - Juris Doctor- Juris Doctor
2013
Guardian Ad Litems: The Legal Perspective
2010
Social Media
2010
Social Media
2010
Social Media Marketing
2010
Civil and Family Law Litigation
2010
Social Networking for Family Law Attorneys
2009
Low-Cost Litigation for Family Law Attorneys
2010
2010
English
Legal Answers
What kind of motion do I need to file to get my son back quickly?
18 Mar 2019
What can I do to get legal rights as a father to my daughter?
16 Mar 2019
Do judges ever review the parents' communication on Our Family Wizard to help them make decisions in settling divorces?
21 Mar 2019