Paul Garland Bonneson

Paul Garland Bonneson

5.0
Rating: 9.5

Licensed for 41 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at Milwaukee, WI
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, Appeals, Family

10909 West Bluemound Road, Milwaukee, WI

About Paul

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Appeals 45%

42 years | 200 cases

45%
Criminal Defense 45%

42 years | 300 cases

45%
Family 10%

42 years | 200 cases

10%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Wisconsin for 41 years

State: Wisconsin

Acquired: 1984

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Location

Bonneson Law Offices

10909 West Bluemound Road, Milwaukee, WI, 53226

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Paul Garland Bonneson's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

3 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (3) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 3
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews

Posted by Heiny | November 08, 2017 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

FIVE STARS.

My case was dropped. Kerplunk. Over. Pure perfection and he put up with me. 10 out of 10. Five stars.

Posted by Gary | May 24, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Car Accidents

Rate Paul Bonneson

My wife and I have known Mr. Bonneson for 25 years. He represented me when I was a passenger in a minor traffic accident and settled the issue in my favor in a very professional manner. Over the years, we have consulted with him several times at no cost to us. One of those times he was helpful in... referring us to an attorney that was an expert in that type of matter. Mr. Bonneson has been an active volunteer in several community organizations giving freely of his time. One of those organizations was a local Humane Society. We highly recommend consulting with Paul, he will steer you in the right direction.

Posted by anonymous | May 23, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Business

Highly recommended.

Mr. Bonneson represented me twice: once in a personal matter and once in a business matter. Each time, I found him knowledgeable about the legal issues and attentive to the facts. He was prompt, professional and courteous as well as efficient and effective. The legal issues were resolved to my satis...faction. His fees were reasonable for the amount of work done.

See All Client Reviews

Paul Garland Bonneson's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Paul
Linda M. Van De Water headshot
Linda Van De Water

Criminal defense lawyer | Nov 19

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I have known Paul for many years and he is a very professional and conscientious lawyer. He has appeared in front of me when I was a judge and he was always very courteous, professional and well prepared. I was impressed enough with Paul as a lawyer that I appointed him as my court commissioner while I served on the Waukesha County Bench as a judge. He cares about his client's and his reputation. Very knowledgeable and I would highly recommend Paul."

Michael J. Fleissner headshot
Michael Fleissner

Criminal defense lawyer | Jun 08

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Mr. Bonneson has many years of experience in criminal defense. He is a highly motivated, competent attorney. I have the utmost respect for Attorney Bonneson."

View All Endorsements
Linda M. Van De Water headshot
Linda Van De Water

Mediation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  9.5 (Superb)

Honors

2016

BV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2016

Top 100, Criminal Defense, The National Trial Lawyers

2016

Top 10 Lawyers, Wisconsin., National Academy of Criminal Defense Attorneys

Work Experience

1991 - Present

Owner/Manager, Bonneson Law Offices

2010 - 2016

Supplemental Court Commissioner, Waukesha County Circuit Court

1990 - 1991

Associate Attorney, Rudolph Law Offices

1987 - 1990

Associate Attorney, Tikalsky, Raasch & Tikalsky

1984 - 1987

Associate Attorney, Riemer Law Offices

Associations

1987 - Present

Waukesha County Bar Association

Member

1984 - Present

State Bar of Wisconsin

Member

2004 - 2005

Waukesha County Bar Association

President

2000 - 2003

Waukesha County Bar Association

Board of Directors

1999 - 2005

State Bar of Wisconsin, Young Lawyers Division

Board of Directors

1995 - 1996

State Bar of Wisconsin

Board of Governors

1995 - 1996

State Bar of Wisconsin

Executive Committee

1994 - 1995

State Bar of Wisconsin, Young Lawyers Division

President

Sample of Legal Cases

State of Wisconsin v. Justin T. Winston, 378 Wis.2d 739, 905 N.W.2d 843 (2017), petition for review denied, 1/8/2018.

The Court of Appeals decided that there was insufficent evidence of racial discrimination.

Dismissal of sexual assault charges.

The charges were dismissed.

State v. Williams, Wisconsin Court of Appeals, 2015AP001089-CR

The trial court's decision was affirmed.

Acquittal in attempted armed robbery case.

The client was found not guilty, August 11, 2016.

State of Wisconsin v. Stewart, 366 Wis.2d 807, 874 N.W.2d 346 (Ct.App. 2015)

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals held that the police search was constitutionally valid.

State of Wisconsin v. Gonzales, 345 Wis.2d 397, 824 N.W.2d 927 (2012).

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals held that the defendant's right to remain silent had been violated.

State of Wisconsin v. Carpenter, 334 Wis.2d 145, 799 N.W.2d 928 (Ct.App. 2011).

The exclusion of minors from the jury trial was proper.

Sheboygan County v. Tanya M.B. 2010 WI 55, 775 N.W.2d 531 (2010).

The Supreme Court of Wisconsin held that the omission did not prevent the county from pursuing the termination of parental rights against the parents.

State of Wisconsin v. Davis, 2000 WI App 270, 240 Wis.2d 15, 622 N.W.2d 1.

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals held that the no-knock search warrant had been properly executed.

State of Wisconsin v. Rogers, 196 Wis.2d 817, 539 N.W.2d 817 (Ct.App. 1995).

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals held that the hearsay statement would not be admitted at the trial.

Consumer's Coop of Walworth County v. Olsen, 142 Wis.2d 465, 419 N.W.2d 211 (1988).

The Supreme Court of Wisconsin held against the creditor and held that the creditor could not pierce the corporate veil.

Matter of Goodger v. City of Delavan, 134 Wis.2d 348, 396 N.W.2d 778 (1986).

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals held that the special assessment was invalid.

Crest Chevrolet v. Willemsen, 129 Wis.2d 129, 384 N.W.2d 692 (1986).

The Wisconsin Supreme Court held that the landowner's diversion was not proper.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1984

Drake University Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1981

Marquette University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

1994

Bridge-The-Gap Seminar

Speaker at Bridge-The-Gap Seminar

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution